Blended courses as drivers of institutional transformation

Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for Implementation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 17-37

  Dziuban, Charles D ^a   Hartman, Joel L ^a   Cavanagh, Thomas B ^a   Moskal, Patsy D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052558348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved January 26, 2010 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf
2. Ambivalence. (2010, May 14). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambivalence.
3. Bleed, R. (2001). A hybrid campus for a new millennium. EDUCAUSE Review, 36(1), 16-24.
4. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
5. Brieman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
6. Clark, D. (2003). Blend it like Beckham. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://www.epic.co.uk/content/resources/white_papers/blended.htm
7. Craig, S. C., & Martinez, M. D. (Eds.). (2005). Ambivalence and the structure of political opinion. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781403979094
8. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: An institutional perspective. In Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C. (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream (pp. 127-148). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
9. Feldman, S. (1995). Answering survey questions. In Lodge, M., & McGraw, K. (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 249-270). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1995). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
13. Hartman, J. L. (2010). The promise and practice of blended learning. Presented at the meeting of the Sloan-C Blended Learning Conference, Chicago, IL.
14. Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
15. Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
16. Hitt, J. C., & Hartman, J. L. (2010). Two views of alignment. EDUCAUSE Review, 45(2), 8-9.
17. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependant variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Long, W. A. (1985). The practitioner and adolescent medicine. Seminars in Adolescent Medicine, 1(1), 85-90.
19. Lorenzo, G., & Moore, J. (2002). The Sloan Consortium report to the nation: Five pillars of quality online education. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://www.sloanconsortium.org
20. Martinez, M. D., Craig, S. C., & Kane, J. G. (2005). Pros and cons: Ambivalence and public opinion. In Craig, S., & Martinez, M. (Eds.), Ambivalence and the structure of public opinion (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
21. Moskal, P. D., & Dziuban, C. D. (2001). Present and future directions for assessing cybereducation: The changing research paradigm. In Vandervert, L., Shavinina, L., & Cornell, R. (Eds.), CyberEducation: The future of long distance learning (pp. 157-184). Larchmont, NY: Mary Ann Liebert Publishers.
22. Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just in time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Series in Educational Innovation.
23. Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18.
24. Picciano, A. G., & Dziuban, C. D. (Eds.). (2007). Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
25. Power, M. (2008). The emergence of a blended online learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 503-514. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/power_1208.pdf
26. Rapp Young, B., & Dziuban, E. (2000). Understanding dependency and passivity: Reactive behavior patterns in writing centers. The Writing Center Journal, 21(1), 67-87.
27. Sloan Consortium. (n.d.). Blended learning Chemistry course. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/node/262
28. Sloan Consortium. (n.d.). The Babson Strategy: Blended online education enables localness and geo-localness. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/node/441
29. Sloan Consortium. (n.d.). Definition: What is online learning? Retrieved January 25, 2010 from http://www.fldlc.org/taskforce/pdf/sloan_definition.pdf
30. Wang, M. C., Dziuban, C. D., Cook, I. J., & Moskal, P. D. (2009). Dr. Fox rocks: Using data-mining techniques to examine student ratings of instruction. In M. C. Shelley, L. D. Yore, & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in the literary and science education: International perspectives and gold standards (pp. 383-398). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
31. Weigert, A. J. (1991). Mixed emotions: Certain steps toward understanding ambivalence. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32. Williams, J. (2003). Blending into the background. E-Learning Age Magazine, 1.