Aberrant or Atypical Results

Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 355-386

  Burgess, Christopher ^a  

^a Lendings Startforth Barnard Castle Co   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aberrant of atypical results; Analytical process capability; Concepts of measurement performance; CuSum analysis of system suitability data; Laboratory failure investigation; Method validation; Out of expectation results; Pharmaceutical analysis; Sources of variability in analytical methods; Sources of variability in analytical procedures

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052553807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/3527604685.ch10     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. C. Burgess: Valid Analytical Methods and Procedures. The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2000, ISBN 0-85404-482-5.
2. Draft Guidance for Industry; Investigating Out of Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production, FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), September 1998.
3. US CGMP regulations (21 CFR§ 211.160 (b)(4)).
4. AMC Technical Brief No. 13, The Royal Society of Chemistry, September 2003, (http://www.rsc.org/lap/rsccom/amc/amc_index.htm).
5. M. Thompson and R.J. Howarth. Analyst 105 (1980) 1188-1195.
6. ISO 3534:3.12.
7. ISO 3534:3.13.
8. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, S L R Ellison, M Rosslein, A Williams (Eds), 2nd Edition, 2000.
9. L.D. Torbeck: Reportable values for out-of-specification test results. Pharmaceutical Technology, Special supplement, February 1999.
10. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Q2B, Validation Of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, 1996.
11. W. Horwitz: Analytical Chemistry, 54 (1982) 67A-76A.
12. J.S. Oakland, R.F. Followell: Statistical Process Control, 2nd edition, Heinemann Newnes, London, 1990.
13. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Reviewer Guidance, Validation of Chromatographic Methods, November 1994.
14. F.E. Grubbs: Technometrics, 11(1) (1969)1.
15. B. Rosner: Technometrics, 25(2) (1983) 165.
16. B. Iglewicz and D.C. Hoaglin: How to detect and handle outliers. Section 5.2.1, American Society for Quality Control (1993).
17. W.J. Dixon: Biometrics, 9 (1953) 74-89.
18. R.B. Dean, W.J. Dixon: Analytical Chemistry, 23 (1951) 636-638.
19. D.B. Rorabacher: Analytical Chemistry, 63 (1991) 139-146.
20. W. Edwards Deming: Statistical Adjustment of Data. 1943, 171 (Dover Reprint).
21. P.L. Davies: Fresenius Z Anal Chem, 331 (1988) 513-519.
22. P.L. Davies: J Amer. Stat. Soc. 88 (1993) 782-801.
23. T.P.J. Linsinger, W. Kandler, R .Krska, M. Grasserbauer: Accred. Qual. Assur. 3 (1998) 322-327.
24. 21 CFR§160(b).
25. C. Burgess in Analytical Chemistry, R. Kellner, J.-M. Mermet, M. Otto, M. Valcörel, H.M. Widmer (Eds.), 2nd Edition, Chapter 6, Analytical Quality Management, 67-89, 2004, Wiley-VCH, ISBN 3-527-30590-4
26. G. Kateman, L. Buydens: Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry, 2nd Edition, Section 3.4.2, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1993.
27. P.C. Meier, R.E. Zund: Statistical Methods in Analytical Chemistry, 2nd Edition, Section 1.8.4, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2000.
28. R.H. Woodward, P.L. Goldsmith: Cumulative Sum Techniques, Oliver and Boyd for Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Edinburgh, 1964.
29. Juran's Quality Handbook, 5th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, Section 45.17, 1999.
30. Values derived from the nomogram (Figure 12) of British Standard BS 5703 Part II (1980) which was devised using numerical simulation.