Provider volume and short term complications after elective total hip replacement: An analysis of Belgian administrative data

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 311-319

  Camberlin, Cécile ^a   Vrijens, France ^a   De Gauquier, Kristel ^a   Devriese, Stephan ^a   Van De Sande, Stefaan ^a  

^a BELGIAN HEALTH CARE KNOWLEDGE CENTRE KCE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Provider volume; Short term complication; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BELGIUM; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 80052546235     PISSN: 00016462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ackaert K, de Béthune X, Mertens R. Prothèses totales de hanche en Belgique: analyse de suivi. Partie 2: Variations des types de prothèses et durée de survie. Bruxelles: AnMC; november 2009.
2. Com-Ruelle L, Or Z, Renaud T. Volume d'activité et qualité des soins dans les établissements de santé: enseignements de la littérature. Paris: institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé; 2008.
3. D'Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1429-1433. (Pubitemid 27028932)
4. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634. (Pubitemid 27387172)
5. Gillet P, Kolh P, Sermeus W et al. Detection of adverse events in administrative databases. Health Services research (HSr). Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2008. (Available on http://www.kce.fgov. be/index-en. aspx? SGrEF=5223&CrEF=11890)
6. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:511-520. (Pubitemid 35024623)
7. Jacques J, Gillain D, Fecher F et al. Studie naar praktijkverschillen bij electieve chirurgische ingrepen in België. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2006. report no.: D/2006/10.273/45. (Available on: http://www.kce.fgov. be/index-en. aspx? SGrEF=5223&CrEF=9139)
8. Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the united States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg 2001;83-A: 1622-1629.
9. Katz JN, Phillips CB, Baron JA et al. Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:560-568. (Pubitemid 36278026)
10. Khuri SF, Hussaini BE, Kumbhani DJ, Healey NA, Henderson WG. Does volume help predict outcome in surgical disease? Adv Surg 2005;39:379-453. (Pubitemid 41737971)
11. Losina E, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Katz JN. Early failures of total hip replacement: effect of surgeon volume. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1338-1343. (Pubitemid 38480845)
12. Mohamed K, Copeland GP, Boot DA et al. An assessment of the POSSuM system in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 2002;84-B: 735-739. (Pubitemid 34846389)
13. Needham DM, Scales DC, Laupacis A, Pronovost PJ. A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research. J Crit Care 2005;20:12-19. (Pubitemid 40602219)
14. Or Z, Renaud T. Volume d'activité et résultats des soins en france: une analyse multiniveaux des données hospitalières: institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé; 2009 december 2009. Report no.: 1777.
15. Panageas KS, Schrag D, Riedel E, Bach PB, Begg CB. The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:658-665.
16. Solomon DH, Losina E, Baron JA et al. Contribution of hospital characteristics to the volume-outcome relationship: dislocation and infection following total hip replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2436-2444.
17. Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 2005;24:1185-1202. (Pubitemid 40485757)
18. Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A, Dettori J et al. [A rapid review of associations between provider volume and outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Where do the magical threshold values come from?] (in German). Unfallchirurg 2004;107:967-988. (Pubitemid 40125617)
19. Taylor HD, Dennis DA, Crane HS. Relationship between mortality rates and hospital patient volume for medicare patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the hip, knee, spine, and femur. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:235-242. (Pubitemid 29021322)
20. Vrijens F, De Gauquier K, Camberlin C. The volume of surgical interventions and its impact on the outcome: feasibility study based on Belgian data. Good clinical practice (GCP). Brussels: Belgian health care Knowledge centre (KCE); 2009. report no.: d/2009/10.273/35. (available on http://www.kce.fgov. be/index-en. aspx? sGref=5223&cref=13678)