The significance of turbulent flow representation in single-continuum models

Water Resources Research

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Reimann, Thomas ^a   Rehrl, Christoph ^e   Shoemaker, W Barclay ^b   Geyer, Tobias ^c   Birk, Steffen ^d  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER PROPERTIES; CONDUIT NETWORKS; CONTINUUM MODEL; DYNAMIC BEHAVIORS; EXCHANGE FACTORS; FLOW EFFECTS; GRADIENT FUNCTION; HORIZONTAL FLOWS; HYBRID MODEL; HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS; HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; HYDROGRAPHS; KARST AQUIFER; KARST CONDUIT; LAMINAR AND TURBULENT FLOW; LAMINAR MODEL; MATRIX; MODFLOW; PARAMETER STUDIES; ROCK DISSOLUTION; SCALE DEPENDENCY; SPRING DISCHARGES;

AQUIFERS; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DISSOLUTION; HYDRAULICS; HYDROGEOLOGY; LANDFORMS; SPRINGS (WATER);

TURBULENT FLOW;

AQUIFER; DISSOLUTION; FLOW MODELING; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; KARST; KARST HYDROLOGY; LAMINAR FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECHARGE; SPRING WATER; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 80052542091     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR010133     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barenblatt, G. I., I. P. Zheltov, and I. N. Kochina (1960), Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rock, J. Appl. Math. Mech., Engl. Transl., 24(5), 1286-1303.
2. Bauer, S., R. Liedl, and M. Sauter (2003), Modeling of karst aquifer genesis: Influence of exchange flow, Water Resour. Res., 39(10), 1285, doi:10.1029/2003WR002218.
3. Bear, J. (1988), Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, reprint, Dover, New York.
4. Birk, S., T. Geyer, R. Liedl, and M. Sauter (2005), Process-based interpretation of tracer tests in carbonate aquifers, Ground Water, 43(3), 381-388. (Pubitemid 40697662)
5. Birk, S., R. Liedl, and M. Sauter (2006), Karst spring responses examined by process-based modeling, Ground Water, 44(6), 832-836. (Pubitemid 44657079)
6. Covington, M. D., C. M. Wicks, and M. O. Saar (2009), A dimensionless number describing the effects of recharge and geometry on discharge from simple karstic aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 45, W11410, doi:10.1029/2009WR008004.
7. Eisenlohr, L., L. Király, M. Bouzelboudjen, and Y. Rossier (1997), Numerical simulation as a tool for checking the interpretation of karst spring hydrographs, J. Hydrol., 193, 306-315. (Pubitemid 27275283)
8. Forchheimer, P. (1901), Wasserbewegung durch Boden, Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing., 45, 1782-1788.
9. Ford, D., and P. Williams (2007), Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology, John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
10. Halford, K. J. (2000), Simulation and interpretation of borehole flowmeter results under laminar and turbulent flow conditions, paper presented at Seventh International Symposium on Logging for Minerals and Geotechnical Applications, The Minerals and Geotechnical Logging Society, Golden, Colo.
11. Harbaugh, A. W. (2005), MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological survey modular ground-water model-The ground-water flow process, U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, Book 6, Chapter 16, Sect. A, 253 pp.
12. Hill, M. E., M. T. Steward, and A. Martin (2010), Evaluation of the MODFLOW-2005 Conduit Flow Process, Ground Water, 48(4), 549-559, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00673.x.
13. Hsieh, P. A., and J. R. Freckleton (1993), Documentation of a computer program to simulate horizontal-flow barriers using the U.S. Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 92-477, 32 pp.
14. Jain, S. C. (2001), Open-Channel Flow, John Wiley, New York.
15. Kanda, H., and T. Yanagiya (2008), Hysteresis curve in reproduction of Reynolds' color-band experiments, J. Fluid. Eng., 130(5), 051202, doi:10.1115/1.2903741.
16. Kaufmann, G. (2009), Modelling karst geomorphology on different time scales, Geomorphology, 106, 62-77, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.09.016.
17. Király, L. (1984), Régularisation de l'Areuse (Jura Suisse) simulée par modèle mathématique, in Hydrogeology of Karstic Terraines, edited by A. Burger and L. Dubertret, pp. 94-99, Heise, Hannover, Germany.
18. Király, L. (2002), Karstification and groundwater flow, in Proceedings ofthe Conference on Evolution of Karst: From Prekarst to Cessation, Postojna-Ljubljana, edited by F. Gabrovsek, ZRC Publishing, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 155-190.
19. Kuniansky, E. L., K. J. Halford, and W. B. Shoemaker (2008), Permeameter data verify new turbulence process for MODFLOW, Ground Water, 46(5), 768-771.
20. Liedl, R., M. Sauter, D. Hückinghaus, T. Clemens, and G. Teutsch (2003), Simulation of the development of karst aquifers using a coupled continuum pipe flow model, Water Resour. Res., 39(3), 1057, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR001206.
21. Lindgren, R. J., A. R. Dutton, S. D. Hovorka, S. R. H. Worthington, and S. Painter (2004), Conceptualization and simulation of the Edwards aquifer, San Antonio region, Texas, U.S. Geol. Surv. Sci. Invest. Rep., 2004-5277.
22. Meyer, B. A., T. R. Kincaid, and T. H. Hazlett (2008), Modeling karstic controls on watershed-scale groundwater flow in the Floridian aquifer of north Florida, in Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst, Geotech. Spec. Publ., vol. 183, edited by L. B. Yuhr, E. C. Alexander Jr., and B. F. Beck, pp. 351-361, Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., Reston, Va.
23. Muskat, M. (1946), The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media, McGraw-Hill, Ann Arbor, Mich.
24. Painter, S. L., A. Sun, and R. T. Green (2006), Enhanced Characterization and Representation of Flow Through Karst Aquifers, AWWA Res. Found., Denver, Colo.
25. Peterson, E. W., and C. M. Wicks (2005), Fluid and solute transport from a conduit to the matrix in a carbonate aquifer system, Math. Geol., 37(8), 851-867.
26. Peterson, E. W., and C. M. Wicks (2006), Assessing the importance of conduit geometry and physical parameters in karst systems using the storm water management model (SWMM), J. Hydrol., 329(1-2), 294-305. (Pubitemid 44331900)
27. Rehrl, C., S. Birk, and A. B. Klimchouk (2008), Conduit evolution in deep-seated settings: Conceptual and numerical models based on field observations, Water Resour. Res., 44, W11425, doi:10.1029/2008WR006905.
28. Reimann, T., S. Birk, C. Rehrl, and W. B. Shoemaker (2011), Modifications to the Conduit Flow Process Mode 2 for MODFLOW-2005, Ground Water, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00805.x, published online 3 March 2011.
29. Scanlon, B. R., R. E. Mace, M. E. Barrett, and B. Smith (2003), Can we simulate regional groundwater flow in a karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA, J. Hydrol., 276(1-4), 137-158. (Pubitemid 36695689)
30. Šen, Z. (1995), Applied Hydrogeology for Scientists and Engineers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
31. Shoemaker, W. B., E. L. Kuniansky, S. Birk, S. Bauer, and E. D. Swain (2008a), Documentation of a conduit flow process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005, U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, Book 6, Chapter A.
32. Shoemaker, W. B., K. J. Cunningham, E. L. Kuniansky, and J. Dixon (2008b), Effects of turbulence on hydraulic heads and parameter sensitivities in preferential groundwater flow layers, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03501, doi:10.1029/2007WR006601. (Pubitemid 351649219)
33. Teutsch, G., and M. Sauter (1998), Distributed parameter modeling approaches in karst-hydrological investigations, Bull. Hydrogeol., 16, 99-109.
34. Worthington, S. R. H. (2009), Diagnostic hydrogeologic characteristics of a karst aquifer (Kentucky, USA), Hydrogeol. J., 17, 1665-1678.
35. Young, D. F., B. R. Munson, and T. H. Okiishi (2004), A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 3rd ed., John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J.