Neurological Principles and Rehabilitation of Action Disorders: Common Clinical Deficits

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 25, Issue , 2011, Pages 21S-32S

  Sathian, K ^a   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^b   Cohen, Leonardo G ^c   Krakauer, John W ^d   Lang, Catherine E ^e   Corbetta, Maurizio ^f   Fitzpatrick, Susan M ^f,g  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g The James S McDonnell Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APRAXIA; ATAXIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

APRAXIAS; ATAXIA; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 80052525236     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968311410941     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951; 74: 443-480.
2. Beebe JA Lang CE. Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119: 2074-2085.
3. Delwaide PJ. Parkinsonian rigidity. Funct Neurol. 2001; 16: 147-156.
4. Hallett M. Parkinson revisited: pathophysiology of motor signs. Adv Neurol. 2003; 91: 19-28.
5. Brunnström S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1970.
6. Lang CE Beebe JA. Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 279-291.
7. Finch E Brooks D Stratford PW Mayo NE. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making. 2nd ed. Ontario, Canada; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
8. Buxbaum LJ Schwartz MF Montgomery MW. Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998; 15: 617-643.
9. Buxbaum LJ. Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase. 2001; 7: 445-458.
10. Schwartz MF Segal M Veramonti T Ferraro M Buxbaum LJ. The Naturalistic Action Test. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002; 12: 311-339.
11. Vanbellingen T Kersten B Van de Winckel A, et al. A new bedside test of gestures in stroke: the apraxia screen of TULIA (AST). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011; 82: 389-392.
12. Bastian AJ. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006; 16: 645-649.
13. Diedrichsen J Criscimagna-Hemminger SE Shadmehr R. Dissociating timing and coordination as functions of the cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 6291-6301.
14. Shadmehr R Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 185: 359-381.
15. Donkervoort M Dekker J Deelman B. The course of apraxia and ADL functioning in left hemisphere stroke patients treated in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20: 1085-1093.
16. Manto M Jacquy J Hildebrand J Godaux E. Recovery of hypermetria after a cerebellar stroke occurs as a multistage process. Ann Neurol. 1995; 38: 437-445.
17. Manto M Godaux E Jacquy J. Detection of silent cerebellar lesions by increasing the inertial load of the moving hand. Ann Neurol. 1995; 37: 344-350.
18. Amrani K Dykes RW Lamarre Y. Bilateral contributions to motor recovery in the monkey following lesions of the deep cerebellar nuclei. Brain Res. 1996; 740: 275-284.
19. Mackel R. The role of the monkey sensory cortex in the recovery from cerebellar injury. Exp Brain Res. 1987; 66: 638-652.
20. Ward NS Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61: 1844-1848.
21. Floel A Cohen LG. Recovery of function in humans: cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments after stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2010; 37: 243-251.