The perceived importance of family-friendly policies to childbirth decision among Hong Kong women

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 381-392

  Wong, Chack Kie ^a   Tang, Kwong Leung ^a,b   Ye, Shengquan ^c  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Childbirth; Family friendly policies; Fertility; Rationality theory; Risk society

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052505602     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: 14682397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00757.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adsera A (2003). Changing Fertility Rates in Developed Countries: The Impact of Labor Market Institutions. Journal of Population Economics 17: 17-43.
2. American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th edn). Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
3. Bagozzi R, van Loo MF (1979). Fertility as Consumption - Theories From the Behavioral - Rejoinder. Journal of Consumer Research 5(4): 297-302.
4. Beck U (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Sage.
5. Beck U (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge, UK, Polity.
6. Becker GS (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In: National Bureau of Economic Research, ed. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209-231. Princeton, NJ, National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Becker GS (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal 75(299): 493-517.
8. Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973). On the Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy 81: S279-S288.
9. Bergstrom TC (1996). Economics in a Family Way. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1903-1934.
10. Bjorklund A (2006). Does Family Policy Affect Fertility? Lessons From Sweden. Journal of Population Economics 19(1): 3-24.
11. Bjorklund A (2007). Does a Family-Friendly Policy Raise Fertility Levels? Stockholm, Sweden, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
12. Cheung MKC (2006). Family-Friendly Policies. Presented at the 14th International Employment Relations Association Conference 'Family-Friendly Employment Policies and Practices: An East-West Perspective on Work-Life Balance'. Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
13. CIA World Factbook (2009). Hong Kong. Available at [last accessed 23 August 2010].
14. Cohen J (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 155-159.
15. Coleman D (1998). Reproduction and Survival in an Unknown World - What Drives Today's Industrial Population and to What Future. NIDI Hofetee Lecture Series No. 5, The Hague, The Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
16. Crompton R, Lyonette C (2006). Work-Life 'Balance' in Europe. Acta Sociologica 49(4): 379-393.
17. d'Addio AC, d'Ercole MM (2005). Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates: The Role of Policies. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No.27.
18. De la Rica S, Ferreo D (2003). The Effect of Fertility on Labour Force Participation. Spanish Economic Review 5(7): 153-172.
19. Demographic Trends in Hong Kong 1981-2006, Hong Kong Government, Census and Statistics Department. (2007). Demographic Trends in Hong Kong 1981-2006. Retrieved from.
20. Dex S, Smith C (2002). The Nature and Pattern of Family-Friendly Employment Policies in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.
21. Duxbury L, Higgins C, Lee C (1994). Work-Family Conflict: A Comparison by Gender, Family Type and Perceived Control. Journal of Family Issues 15(3): 449-466.
22. Easterlin R, Crimmins EM (1985). The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
23. Edlund J (2007, December). The Work-Family Time Squeeze: Conflicting Demands of Paid and Unpaid Work Among Working Couples in 29 Countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48(6): 451-480.
24. Esping-Andersen G (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economy. New York, Oxford University Press.
25. Esping-Andersen G (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
26. European Commission (2008). A Better Work-Life Balance: Stronger Support for Reconciling Professional, Private and Family Life. Available at [last accessed 23 July 2010].
27. Family Planning Association of Hong Kong (1999). Report on the Survey of Knowledge, Attitude & Practice in Hong Kong 1997. Hong Kong, People's Republic of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
28. Ferrarini T (2006). Families, States and Labour Market: Institutions, Causes and Consequences of Family Policy in Post-War Welfare States. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing.
29. Friedman D, Hechter M, Kanazawa S (1994). Theory of the Value of Children. Demography 31(3): 375-415.
30. Gauthier AH, Hatzius J (1997). Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis. Population Studies 51(3): 295-306.
31. Giddens A (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
32. Giddens A (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
33. Gornick JC, Heron A, Eisenbre R (2007). The Work-Family Balance: An Analysis of European, Japanese, and US Work-Time Policies. EPI Briefing Paper 189.
34. Green SB, Salkind NJ, Akey TM (2000). Using SPSS for Windows: analyzing and understanding data (2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
35. Grossbard-Shechtman S (1993). On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and Divorce. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
36. Hakim C (2003). A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. Population and Development Review 29(3): 349-374.
37. Hoem B, Hoem J (1997). Fertility Trends in Sweden up to 1996. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 40/41: 318-333. Department of Demography, Stockholm University, Sweden.
38. Hong Kong SAR Government (200708). Hong Kong Policy Address: A New Direction for Hong Kong. Available at [last accessed 23 July 2010].
39. Horvath-Rose AE, Peters HE (2001). Welfare Waivers and Nonmarital Childbearing. In: Greg J, Duncan GJ, Lindsay Chase-Lansdale P, eds. For Better and for Worse: Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Children and Families, pp. 222-244. New York, Russell Sage.
40. Lee MY, Law CK, Tam KL (1999). Parenthood and Life Satisfaction: A Comparison of Single and Dual-Parent Families in Hong Kong. International Social Work 42(2): 139-162.
41. Legislative Council Secretariat (2004). Major Demographic Indicators of Selected Economies. Hong Kong, Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council, The Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong.
42. Lesthaege R (1983). A Century of Demographic and Culture Change in Western Europe: An Explanation of Underlying Dimensions. Population and Development Review 9(3): 411-435.
43. Lewis J (2003). Developing Early Years Childcare in England, 1997-2002: The Choices for (Working) Mothers. Social Policy and Administration 37: 219-238.
44. Lo STS (2005). A Study of the Policy Options for the HKSAR Government to Tackle the Low Fertility Rate in Hong Kong. Unpublished Master of Public Administration Thesis, University of Hong Kong.
45. Losoncz I, Bortolotto N (2009). Work-life balance - the experiences of Australian women. Journal of Family studies, 15(2): 122-138.
46. Martin MA (2003). The Role of Family Income in the Intergenerational Association of AFDC Receipt. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(2): 326-340.
47. McDonald P (2002). Sustaining Fertility Through Public Policy: The Range of Options. Population 57(3): 417-446. Available at [last accessed 15 April 2009].
48. Molm LD (1997). Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
49. Monroe P, Tiller VV (2001). Commitment to Work Among Welfare Reliant Women. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(3): 816-828.
50. Ohinata A (2008). Fertility Response to Financial Incentives - Evidence From the Working Families Tax Credit in the UK. Available at [last accessed 23 June 2010].
51. Pierson P (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
52. Siu OL, Phillips DR (2007). Research on Family-Friendly Employment Policies and Practices in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, HKSAR Government: Equal Opportunity Commission and Women's Commission.
53. Stevens J (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (3rd edn). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Strydom P (2002). Risk, Environment and Society: Ongoing Debates, Current Issues and Future Prospects. Buckingham, UK, Open University Press.
55. Tang KL (2000). Social Welfare Development in East Asia. New York, Palgrave.
56. Task Force on Population (2003). Report of the Task Force on Population. Hong Kong, Hong Kong Government of the Special Administrative Region.
57. Taylor-Gooby P (2004). New Social Risks and Welfare States: New Paradigm and New Politics? In: Taylor-Gooby P, ed. New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare States, pp. 209-238. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
58. Vos A (2009). Falling Fertility Rates: New Challenges to the European Welfare State. Socio-Economic Review 7(3): 485-503.
59. Whittington LA, Alm J, Peters HE (1990). Fertility and the Personal Exemptions: Implicit Pronatalist Policy in the United States. American Economic Review 80(2): 545-556.
60. Williams J (2001). Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York, Oxford University Press.
61. Willis RJ (1973). A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior. Journal of Political Economy March-April: 8(2): S14-S64
62. Yip P, Lee J (2002). The Impact of the Changing Marital Structure on Fertility of Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region). Social Science and Medicine 55(12): 2159-2169.