Qualitative research on software development: A longitudinal case study methodology

Empirical Software Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 430-459

  McLeod, Laurie ^a   MacDonell, Stephen G ^a   Doolin, Bill ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Empirical research; Longitudinal case study; Qualitativemethods; Software development

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EMPIRICAL CASE STUDIES; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; LONGITUDINAL CASE STUDY; MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITATIVEMETHODS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 80052500825     PISSN: 13823256     EISSN: 15737616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-010-9153-5     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Allison I, Merali Y (2007) Software process improvement as emergent change: a structurational analysis. Inf Softw Technol 49(6):668-681 (Pubitemid 46602962)
2. Benbasat I, Goldstein DK, Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. Manage Inf Syst Q 11(3):369-386
3. Boehm B (2006) A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering. In: Rombach D, Soffa ML (eds) Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, New York, pp 12-29 (Pubitemid 46600898)
4. Bratthall L, Joørgensen M (2002) Can you trust a single data source exploratory software engineering case study? Empire Software Eng 7(1):9-26 (Pubitemid 34473462)
5. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77-101
6. Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press
7. Oxford Cavaye ALM (1996) Case study research: a multi-faceted research approach for IS. Inf Syst J 6(3):227-242
8. Charette RN (2005) Why software fails. IEEE Spectr 42(9):42-49
9. Ciborra CU, Lanzara GF (1994) Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Acc Manag Inf Technol 4(2):61-86
10. Coleman G, O'Connor R (2007) Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: a study of Irish software product companies. Inf Softw Technol 49(6):654-667 (Pubitemid 46602967)
11. Constantinides P, Barrett M (2006) Negotiating ICT development and use: the case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of Crete. Inf Organ 16(1):27-55 (Pubitemid 43046046)
12. Darke P, Shanks G, Broadbent M (1998) Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Inf Syst J 8(4):273-289
13. Dittrich Y, John M, Singer J, Tessem B (2007) Editorial for the special issue on qualitative software engineering research. Inf Softw Technol 49(6):531-539 (Pubitemid 46602970)
14. Dittrich Y, Rönkkö K, Eriksson J, Hansson C, Lindeberg O (2008) Cooperative method development: combining qualitative empirical research with method, technique and process improvement. Empire Software Eng 13(3):231-260
15. Doolin B (1996) Alternative views of case research in information systems. Aust J Inf Syst 3(2):21-29
16. Easterbrook SM, Singer J, Storey M-A, Damian D (2008) Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Shull F, Singer J, Sjoøberg DIK (eds) Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Springer, London, pp 285-311
17. El Emam K, Koru AG (2008) A replicated survey of IT software project failures. IEEE Softw 25(5):84-90
18. Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219-245 (Pubitemid 43538853)
19. Galliers RD, Swan JA (2000) There's more to information systems development than structured approaches: information requirements analysis as a socially mediated process. Requir Eng 5(2):74-82
20. Gasson S (1999) A social action model of situated information systems design. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 30(2):82-97
21. Geertz C (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretative theory of culture. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York
22. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley
23. Glaser BG, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago
24. Glass RL, Vessey I, Ramesh V (2002) Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. Inf Softw Technol 44(8):491-506 (Pubitemid 34704253)
25. Golden-Biddle K, Locke K (1993) Appealing work: an investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organ Sci 4(4):595-616
26. Guba EG (1990) The alternative paradigm dialog. In: Guba EG (ed) The paradigm dialog. Sage, London, pp 17-27
27. Harrison R, Badoo N, Barry E, Biffl S, Parra A, Winter B, Wuest J (1999) Directions and methodologies for empirical software engineering research. Empire Software Eng 4(4):405-410
28. Höst M, Runeson P (2007) Checklists for software engineering case study research. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM'07). IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, pp 479-481
29. Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Manage Inf Syst Q 23(1):67-94
30. Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manage Rev 24(4):691-710
31. Langley A, Truax J (1994) A process study of new technology adoption in smaller manufacturing firms. J Manag Stud 31(5):619-652
32. Lanzara GF (1999) Between transient constructs and persistent structures: designing systems in action. J Strateg Inf Syst 8(4):331-349 (Pubitemid 129621553)
33. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
34. Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ Sci 1(3):248-266
35. Lethbridge TC, Singer J, Sim SE (2005) Studying software engineers: data collection techniques for software field studies. Empire Software Eng 10(3):311-341 (Pubitemid 40940550)
36. Madsen S, Kautz K, Vidgen R (2006) A framework for understanding how a unique and local IS development method emerges in practice. Eur J Inf Syst 15(2):225-238 (Pubitemid 44022576)
37. Markus ML, Lee AS (1999) Special issue on intensive research in information systems: using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 23(1):35-38
38. Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34(5):583-598
39. McLeod L (2008) Understanding IS development and acquisition: a process approach. PhD thesis (http://hdl.handle.net/10292/644), Auckland University of Technology
40. McLeod L, MacDonell S (in press) Factors that affect software systems de velopment project outcomes: a survey of research. ACM Comput Surv.
41. Miller J (2008) Triangulation as a basis for knowledge discovery in software engineering. Empire Software Eng 13(2):223-228
42. Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Inf Syst Res 12(3):240-259
43. Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf Organ 17(1):2-26
44. Nandhakumar J, Avison DE (1999) The fiction of methodical development: a field study of information systems development. Inf Technol People 12(2):176-191
45. Nandhakumar J, Jones M (1997) Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research. Inf Syst J 7(2):109-131 (Pubitemid 127468505)
46. Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Acad Manage Rev 24(4):711-724
47. Perry DE, Porter AA, Votta LG (2000) Empirical studies of software engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, pp 345-355
48. Perry DE, Sim SE, Easterbrook SM (2004) Case studies for software engineers. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, pp 736-738
49. Perry DE, Sim SE, Easterbrook SM (2005) Case studies for software engineers. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop-Tutorial Notes. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos CA, pp 96-159 (Pubitemid 44499605)
50. Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1(3):267-292
51. Pettigrew AM (1997) What is processual analysis? Scand J Manag 13(4):337-348
52. Robinson H, Segal J, Sharp H (2007) Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Inf Softw Technol 49(6):540-551 (Pubitemid 46602965)
53. Rönkkö K, Lindeberg O, Dittrich Y (2002) 'Bad practice' or 'bad methods': are software engineering and ethnographic discourses incompatible? In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'02). IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, pp 204-210
54. Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) The challenges of complex IT projects. Royal Academy of Engineering, London
55. Runeson P, Höst M (2009a) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empire Software Eng 14(2):131-164
56. Runeson P, Höst M (2009b) Tutorial: case studies in software engineering. In: Bomarius F, Oivo M, Jaring P, Abrahamsson P (eds) Product-focused software process improvement (Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, PROFES 2009, Oulu, Finland, June 15-17). Springer, Berlin, pp 441-442
57. Schultze U, Orlikowski WJ (2004) A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: the use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inf Syst Res 15(1):87-106
58. Seaman C (1999) Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25(4):557-572 (Pubitemid 129304118)
59. Segal J, Grinyer A, Sharp H (2005) The type of evidence produced by empirical software engineers. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering (REBSE'05). ACM, New York, NY
60. Sieber JE (2001) Protecting research subjects, employees and researchers: implications for software engineering. Empire Software Eng 6(4):329-341 (Pubitemid 33067823)
61. Sim SE, Singer J, Storey M-A (2001) Beg, borrow, or steal: using multidisciplinary approaches in empirical software engineering research. Empire Software Eng 6(1):85-93 (Pubitemid 32188791)
62. Singer J, Vinson NG (2002) Ethical issues in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 28(12):1171-1180
63. Sjoøberg DIK, Dybå T, Joørgensen M (2007) The future of empirical methods in software engineering research. In: Briand LC, Wolf AL (eds) Future of software engineering (FOSE'07). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 358-378 (Pubitemid 47484937)
64. Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser L, Huhns MN (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence (vol. 2). Pitman Publishing, London, pp 37-54
65. Subrahmanian E, Monarch I, Konda S, Granger H, Milliken R, Westerberg A, The N-Dim Group (2003) Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Comput Support Coop Work 12 (2):185-203
66. Tolich M, Davidson C (1999) Starting fieldwork: an introduction to qualitative research in New Zealand. Oxford University Press, Auckland
67. Voss C, Tsikriktsis N, Frohlich M (2002) Case research in operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(2):195-219
68. Wainer J, Barsottini C (2007) Empirical research in CSCW-a review of the ACM/CSCW conferences from 1998 to 2004. J Braz Comput Soc 13(3):27-36
69. Wallace L, Keil M (2004) Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Commun ACM 47(4):68-73
70. Walsham G (1993) Interpreting information systems in organizations. Wiley.
71. Chichester Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4(2):74-81
72. Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. Eur J Inf Syst 15:320-330 (Pubitemid 44146931)
73. Walsham G, Sahay S (1999) GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. Manage Inf Syst Q 23(1):39-66
74. Westrup C (1993) Information systems methodologies in use. J Inf Technol 8(4):267-275
75. Whittle A (2005) Preaching and practising 'flexibility': Implications for theories of subjectivity at work. Hum Relat 58(10):1301-1322 (Pubitemid 41807422)
76. Wynekoop JL, Russo NL (1997) Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods. Inf Syst J 7(1):47-65 (Pubitemid 127468593)
77. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
78. Zuboff S (1988) In the age of the smart machine. Basic Books, New York