Two Conceptions of Remedies

Justifying Private Law Remedies

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 3-32

  Weinrib, Ernest J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052483641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. P Birks, Unjust Enrichment 21 (2nd edition, 2005).
2. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, V, 1132a 19–29 (M Ostwald trans, 1962).
3. H Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (B Litschewski Paulson and SL Paulson, trans) 30.
4. H Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (M Knight, trans), 111.
5. S Levmore, ‘Unifying Remedies: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Startling Rules’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2149.
6. I Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals, M Gregor, ed, 24 [6:230].
7. GWF Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, AW Wood, ed (1991), s 36
8. J Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001), 23.
9. A Ripstein, ‘As If It Had Never Happened’ (2007) 48 William and Mary Law Review 1957.
10. R Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Meditation II.
11. EJ Weinrib, ‘Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice’ (2000) 1 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2.
12. EJ Weinrib, ‘Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies’ (2003) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 55
13. G Calabresi and D Melamed, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.
14. EJ Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law (1995) 194–1295.
15. R Epstein, ‘A Clear View of the Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2091.
16. RH Coase, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1.
17. WN Hohfeld, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16, 32.
18. HE Smith, ‘Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance’ (2004) 90 Virginia Law Review 965, 1012
19. D Friedmann, ‘Rights and Remedies’ in N Cohen and E McKendrick (ed), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005), 3, 7
20. M Morris, ‘The Structure of Entitlements’ (1992) 78 Cornell Law Review 822, 851–6
21. I Ayres and P Goldbart, ‘Optimal Delegation and Decoupling in the Design of Liability Rules’ (2001) 100 Michigan Law Review 1
22. I Ayres, Optional Law (2005).
23. G Hammond, ‘Rethinking Remedies: The Changing Conception of the Relationship Between Legal and Equitable Remedies’ in J Berryman (ed), Remedies: Issues and Perspectives (1991), 87, 90–91
24. M Tilbury, ‘Remedies and the Classification of Obligations’ in A Robertson (ed), The Law of Obligations and Boundaries (2004), 11, 17–24.
25. P Birks, ‘Definition and Division: A Meditation on Institutes 3.13’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (1997), 1, 24
26. JD Davies, ‘Duties of Confidence and Loyalty’ [1990] Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 4, 5.
27. P Benson, ‘The Unity of Contract Law’, in P Benson (ed), The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays 118, 177 (2001).
28. R Kreitner, ‘Multiplicity in Contract Remedies’, in Cohen and McKendrick, above n 48, 19, 35–7.
29. D Wright, ‘Wrong and Remedy: A Sticky Relationship’ [2001] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 300.
30. LE Weinrib, ‘The Postwar Paradigm and American Exceptionalism’ in S Choudhry (ed), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (2006)
31. T Weir, ‘The Staggering March of Negligence’ in P Cane and J Stapleton (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (1998), 99, 124
32. JM Perillo, ‘Abuse of Rights: A Pervasive Legal Concept’ (1995) 27 Pacific Law Journal 37.
33. S Herman, ‘Classical Social Theories and the Doctrine of “Abuse of Rights”’ (1977) 37 Louisiana Law Review 747
34. WT Tête, ‘Tort Roots and the Ramifications of the Obligations Revision’ (1986) 32 Loyola Law Review 47, 68–72
35. A Gambaro, ‘Abuse of Rights in the Civil Law Tradition’ in AMRabello (ed), Aequitas and Equity: Equity in Civil Law and Mixed Jurisdictions (1997) 632, 637
36. A Yiannopoulos, ‘Abuse of Right in Louisiana’, 690, 700.
37. J Berryman, The Law of Equitable Remedies (2000), 175.