Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1099-1108

  Ozog, Yves ^a   Konstantinovic, Maja L ^a,b   Werbrouck, Erika ^a,b   De Ridder, Dirk ^b   Edoardo, Mazza ^c,d   Deprest, Jan ^a,b  

^a Center for Surgical Technologies Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Lightweight; Polyglecaprone; Polypropylene; Rabbit; Shrinkage; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; POLYDIOXANONE; POLYGLECAPRONE; POLYPROPYLENE; POLYVINYLIDINEFLUORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOMECHANICS; COLLAGEN AMOUNT; COLLAGEN COMPOSITION; COLLAGEN ORGANIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELONGATION AT MAXIMAL STRESS; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY; EXPLANT; FIBER DIAMETER; GIANT CELL; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; LENGTH OF COMFORT ZONE; LIGHTWEIGHT SYNTHETIC IMPLANT; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; POLYMORPHONUCLEAR CELL; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; RIGIDITY; SHRINKAGE; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SUTURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THICKNESS; TISSUE ADHESION; WEIGHT; WEIGHT AFTER ABSORPTION; WEIGHT BEFORE ABSORPTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 80052483116     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: 14333023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1440-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. X Jia C Glazener G Mowatt G MacLennan C Bain C Fraser, et al. 2008 Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis BJOG 115 1350 1361 18715243 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01845.x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1cnjt1Wqsg%3D%3D
2. LH Quiroz RE Gutman S Shippey GW Cundiff T Sanses JL Blomquist, et al. 2008 Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 557 e1 5 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.050 (Pubitemid 351609006)
3. D Altman B Anzen S Brismar A Lopez J Zetterstrom 2006 Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh Urology 67 719 724 16566983 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.034
4. J Deprest D De Ridder J Roovers E Werbrouck G Coremans F Claerhout 2009 Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts as compared to synthetic grafts Urology 182 5 2362 2368 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.043
5. C Maher K Baessler CM Glazener EJ Adams S Hagen 2008 Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review Neurourol Urodyn 27 3 12 18092333 10.1002/nau.20542 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FmvFGhug%3D%3D
6. B Feiner JE Jelovsek C Maher 2009 Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review BJOG 116 15 24 19087076 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FjsFOrsg%3D%3D
7. A Bako R Dhar 2009 Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 103 111 18779916 10.1007/s00192-008-0717-5
8. N Kohli PM Walsh TW Roat MM Karram 1998 Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy Obstet Gynecol 92 999 1004 9840566 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00330-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlsVejsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28536119)
9. WS Cobb KW Kercher BT Heniford 2005 The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair Surg Innov 12 63 69 15846448 10.1177/155335060501200109 (Pubitemid 40614255)
10. U Klinge B Klosterhalfen V Birkenhauer K Junge J Conze V Schumpelick 2002 Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model J Surg Res 103 208 214 11922736 10.1006/jsre.2002.6358 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD38XitlGnt7k%3D (Pubitemid 34948503)
11. KA Jones A Feola L Meyn SD Abramowitch PA Moalli 2009 Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes Int Urogynecol J 20 7 847 853 10.1007/s00192-008-0781-x
12. Y Ozog ML Konstantinovic S Verschueren F Spelzini D De Ridder J Deprest 2009 Experimental comparison of abdominal wall repair using different methods of enhancement by small intestinal submucosa graft Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 4 435 441 19139799 10.1007/s00192-008-0793-6
13. Sergent F, Desilles N, Lacoume Y, Bunel C, Marie JP, Marpeau L (2009) Experimental biomechanical evaluation of polypropylene prostheses used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. Epub ahead of print
14. HZ Movat 1955 Demonstration of all connective tissue elements in a single section; pentachrome stains AMA Arch Pathol 60 289 295 13248341 1:STN:280:DyaG28%2FgtVWitQ%3D%3D
15. C Rubod M Boukerrou M Brieu C Jean-Charles P Dubois M Cosson 2008 Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 6 811 816 18188492 10.1007/s00192-007-0533-3 (Pubitemid 351597559)
16. K Junge R Rosch CJ Krones U Klinge PR Mertens P Lynen, et al. 2005 Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair Hernia 9 212 217 15703859 10.1007/s10029-004-0315-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FmsVGmtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43192937)
17. J Conze K Junge C Weiss M Anurov A Oettinger U Klinge, et al. 2008 New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes-PVDF copolymer J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87 321 328 18435400
18. ML Konstantinovic E Pille M Malinowska E Verbeken D De Ridder J Deprest 2007 Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18 6 619 626 17031489 10.1007/s00192-006-0202-y (Pubitemid 46881709)
19. ML Konstantinovic Y Ozog F Spelzini C Pottier D De Ridder J Deprest 2009 Biomechanical findings in rats undergoing fascial reconstruction with graft materials suggested as an alternative to polypropylene Neurourol Urodyn 29 3 488 493
20. MA Garcia-Urena V Vega Ruiz A Diaz Godoy JM Baez Perea LM Marin Gomez FJ Carnero Hernandez, et al. 2007 Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study Am J Surg 193 538 542 17368306 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.045 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjtFGltLg%3D (Pubitemid 46412253)
21. U Klinge B Klosterhalfen M Muller AP Ottinger V Schumpelick 1998 Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs Eur J Surg 164 965 969 10029393 10.1080/110241598750005156 1:STN:280: DyaK1M7ltFymsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29057881)
22. B Klosterhalfen K Junge U Klinge 2005 The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair Expert Rev Med Devices 2 103 117 16293033 10.1586/17434440.2.1.103 (Pubitemid 40124905)
23. J Deprest F Zheng M Konstantinovic F Spelzini F Claerhout A Steensma, et al. 2006 The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 Suppl 1 S16 S25 16738743
24. JM Bellon N Garcia-Honduvilla M Rodriguez G Pascual V Gomez-Gil J Bujan 2006 Influence of the structure of new generation prostheses on shrinkage after implant in the abdominal wall J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78 340 346 16544301 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28votFSktQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44167738)
25. LB Epstein CA Graham MH Heit 2007 Systemic and vaginal biomechanical properties of women with normal vaginal support and pelvic organ prolapse Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 165 e1 6 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.040 (Pubitemid 47198165)
26. LB Epstein CA Graham MH Heit 2008 Impact of sacral colpopexy on in vivo vaginal biomechanical properties Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 664 e1 6 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.056
27. LB Epstein CA Graham MH Heit 2008 Correlation between vaginal stiffness index and pelvic floor disorder quality-of-life scales Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 1013 1018 18217178 10.1007/s00192-007-0551-1 (Pubitemid 351772637)
28. SD Abramowitch A Feola Z Jallah PA Moalli 2009 Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144 Suppl 1 S146 S158 19285776 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.022