Early experience with robotic-assisted lung resection

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 237-242

  Fortes, Daniel L ^a   Tomaszek, Sandra C ^a   Wigle, Dennis A ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

da Vinci surgical system; Minimally invasive lung resection; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG RESECTION; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; THORACOTOMY; TUBE;

EID: 80052474204     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31822ca40c     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Scott WJ, Matteotti RS, Egleston BL, et al. A comparison of perioper-ative outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) lobectomy with open thoracotomy and lobectomy: results of an analysis using propensity score based weighting. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2010;4:1.
2. Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976-981.
3. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139: 366-378.
4. Handy JR Jr, Asaph JW, Douville EC, et al. Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:451-455.
5. Cheng D, Downey RJ, Kernstine K, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials. Innovations. 2007;2:261-292. (Pubitemid 351323202)
6. Rueth NM, Andrade RS. Is VATS lobectomy better: perioperatively, biologically and oncologically? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:S2107-S2111.
7. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2553-2562.
8. Grogan EL, Jones DR. VATS lobectomy is better than open thoracot-omy: what is the evidence for short-term outcomes. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:249-258.
9. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE II, D'Amico TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802-a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4993-4997. (Pubitemid 350220433)
10. Flores RM, Alam N. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (VATS), open thoracotomy, and the robot for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:S710-S715.
11. Flores RM, Ihekweazu UN, Rizk N, et al. Patterns of recurrence and incidence of second primary tumors after lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:59-64.
12. Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, et al. Data from the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:247-254.
13. Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P, et al. Four-arm robotic lobec-tomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:19-25.
14. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706-714. (Pubitemid 47357522)
15. Ashton RC Jr, Connery CP, Swistel DG, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:292-293. (Pubitemid 36909973)
16. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. Building a surgical robotics program. Am J Surg. 2004;188:16S-18S. (Pubitemid 39336468)
17. Park BJ, Flores RM. Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:297-300.
18. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:864-868. (Pubitemid 34308945)
19. Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:54-59. (Pubitemid 43049783)
20. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, et al. Robot-assisted lobec-tomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:380-384.
21. Augustin F, Bodner J, Wykypiel H, et al. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:108-113.
22. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Caravaglios G, Bianco FM. Robot-assisted lung resection: outcomes and technical details. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:388-392.
23. Anderson CA, Hellan M, Falebella A, et al. Robotic-assisted lung resection for malignant disease. Innovations. 2007;2:254-258. (Pubitemid 350307921)
24. Melfi FM, Mussi A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:289-295, vi-vii.
25. Ninan M, Dylewski MR. Total port-access robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy without utility thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38:231-232.
26. Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Shen KR, et al. Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84: 509-513.