A representation of preferences by the Choquet integral with respect to a 2-additive capacity

Theory and Decision

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 297-324

  Mayag, B ^a,b   Grabisch, M ^b   Labreuche, C ^a  

^a THALES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

Author keywords

Belief function; Capacity; Choquet integral; K monotone function; M bius transform; Multiple criteria decision analysis

Indexed keywords

BELIEF FUNCTION; CAPACITY; CHOQUET INTEGRAL; K-MONOTONE FUNCTION; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 80052451947     PISSN: 00405833     EISSN: 15737187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-010-9198-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bana e Costa, C. A., Nunes da Silva, F., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2001). Conflict dissolution in the public sector: A case-study. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 388-401. (Pubitemid 32195798)
2. Banae Costa, C. A., Correa, E. C., De Corte, J.-M., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2002a). Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: A socio-technical approach. Omega, 30, 227-242.
3. Bana e Costa, C. A., De Corte, J.-M., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2002b). On the mathematical foundations of MACBETH. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, 78, 409-437.
4. Berrah, L., & Clivillé, V. (2007). Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 709-719. (Pubitemid 47064406)
5. Chateauneuf, A. (1994). Modeling attitudes towards uncertainty and risk through the use of Choquet integral. Annals of Operations Research, 52, 3-20.
6. Chateauneuf, A. (1995). Ellsberg paradox intuition and Choquet expected utility. In G. Coletti, D. Dubois, & R. Scozzafava (Eds.), Mathematical models for handling partial knowledge in artificial intelligence (pp. 1-20). New York: Plenum Press.
7. Chateauneuf, A., & Jaffray, J. Y. (1989). Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of MÖbius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences, 17, 263-283.
8. Chateauneuf, A., Kast, R., & Lapied, A. (2004). Conditioning capacities and Choquet integrals: The role of comonotony. Theory and Decision, 51(2-4), 367-386. (Pubitemid 33635570)
9. Chateauneuf, A., Grabisch, M., & Rico, A. (2008). Modeling attitudes towards uncertainty through the use of Sugeno integral. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 1084-1099.
10. Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier, 5, 131-295.
11. Clivillé, V., Berrah, L., & Mauris, G. (2007). Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method. International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 171-189. (Pubitemid 44636205)
12. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
13. Gajdos, T. (2002). Measuring inequalities without linearity in envy: Choquet integrals for symmetric capacities. Journal of Economic Theory, 106, 190-220.
14. Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 445-456. (Pubitemid 126386777)
15. Grabisch, M. (1997). k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 167-189.
16. Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2004). Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis (pp. 563-608). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, Ch. (2008). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. 4OR, 6, 1-44.
18. Grabisch, M., Duchêne, J., Lino, F., & Perny, P. (2002). Subjective evaluation of discomfort in sitting position. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 1(3), 287-312.
19. Grabisch,M., Labreuche, Ch., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2003). On the extension of pseudo-Boolean functions for the aggregation of interacting bipolar criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 148, 28-47.
20. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 242-257.
21. Jaffray, J.-Y. (1989). Linear utility theory for belief functions. Operations Research Letters, 8, 107-112.
22. Jaffray, J.-Y., & Wakker, P. (1993). Decision making with belief functions: Compatibility and incompatibility with the sure-thing principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 255-271.
23. Labreuche, Ch., & Grabisch, M. (2003). The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 137, 11-26.
24. Marchant, T. (2003). Towards a theory ofMCDM: Stepping away from social choice theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 45(3), 343-363. (Pubitemid 36515652)
25. Mayag, B., Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2008). A characterization of the 2-additive Choquet integral. In Proceedings of IPMU'08 (CD), Malaga, Spain, June 2008.
26. Miranda, P., Grabisch, M., & Gil, P. (2002). p-symmetric fuzzy measures. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(Suppl.), 105-123.
27. Miranda, P., Grabisch, M., & Gil, P. (2005). Axiomatic structure of k-additive capacities. Mathematical Social Sciences, 49, 153-178. (Pubitemid 40131296)
28. Murofushi, T. & Soneda, S. (1993). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures III: Interaction index. In 9th Fuzzy System Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, May 1993 (pp. 693-696) (in Japanese).
29. Pap, E. (1995). Null-additive set functions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
30. Pignon, J. P. & Labreuche, Ch. (2007). A methodological approach for operational and technical experimentation based evaluation of systems of systems architectures. In Int. conference on software & systems engineering and their applications ICSSEA, Paris, France, December 4-6, 2007.
31. Schmeidler, D. (1986). Integral representation without additivity. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 97(2), 255-261.
32. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57(3), 571-587.
33. Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34. Shapley, L.S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In H.W. Kuhn & A.W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, Vol. II, number 28 in Annals of Mathematics Studies (pp. 307-317). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138.
36. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovitch, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Smets, Ph. (2005). Decision making in the tbm: The necessity of the pignistic transformation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 38(2), 133-147.
38. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
39. Von Neuman, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1994). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40. Weber, S. (1984). ⊥-decomposable measures and integrals for Archimedean t-conorms ?. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application, 101, 114-138.
41. Weymark, J.A. (1981). Generalized Gini inequality indices. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1, 409-430.