To be Used or Not to be Used, that is the Question: Legal Use of Forensic and Clinical Information Collected in a Self-referral Sexual Assault Centre

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1156-1162

  Nesvold, Helle ^a   Ormstad, Kari ^b   Friis, Svein ^c,d  

^a The Emergency Medical Agency   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

DNA; Forensic medicine; Forensic science; Police; Rape; Scandinavia; Sex offenses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NORWAY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; POLICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEXUAL CRIME;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; NORWAY; POLICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX OFFENSES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052443947     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01879.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nesvold H, Worm AM, Vala U, Agnarsdottir G. Different Nordic facilities for victims of sexual assault: a comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:177-83.
2. Schei B, Sidenius K, Lundvall L, Ottesen GL. Adult victims of sexual assault: acute medical response and police reporting among women consulting a center for victims of sexual assault. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:750-5.
3. Kerr E, Cottee C, Chowdhury R, Jawad R, Welch J. The Haven: a pilot referral centre in London for cases of serious sexual assault. BJOG 2003;110:267-71.
4. Sugar NF, Fine DN, Eckert LO. Physical injury after sexual assault: findings of a large case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:71-6.
5. McGregor MJ, Du MJ, Myhr TL. Sexual assault forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:639-47.
6. Ingemann-Hansen O, Brink O, Sabroe S, Sorensen V, Charles AV. Legal aspects of sexual violence: does forensic evidence make a difference? Forensic Sci Int 2008;180:98-104.
7. Helström L. Stockholm South Hospital emergency clinic for raped women. First International Conference on Survivors of Rape; 2008 Nov 14-15; Aarhus, Denmark. Aarhus, Denmark: The Sexual Assault Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, 2008, (accessed April 7, 2009).
8. Du Mont J, Parnis D. Sexual assault and legal resolution: querying the medical collection of forensic evidence. Med Law 2000;19:779-92.
9. Du Mont J, Myhr T. So few convictions: the role of client-related characteristics in the legal processing of sexual assaults. Violence Against Women 2000;6:1109-36.
10. Feldberg G. Defining the facts of rape: the uses of medical evidence in sexual assault trials. Can J Women Law 1997;9:89-94.
11. Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg DC, Wears RL. The prosecution of sexual assault cases: correlation with forensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:39-46.
12. McGregor MJ, Le G, Marion SA, Wiebe E. Examination for sexual assault: is the documentation of physical injury associated with the laying of charges: a retrospective cohort study? CMAJ 1999;160:1565-9.
13. Wiley J, Sugar N, Fine D, Eckert LO. Legal outcomes of sexual assault. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1638-41.
14. Du Mont J, White D. The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: a global review. Geneva, Switzerland: Sexual Violence Research Initiative, World Health Organization, 2007.
15. Kelly L. Routes to (in)justice: a research review on the reporting, investigation and prosecution of rape cases. London, UK: HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, Great Britain, 2002.
16. Nesvold H, Friis S, Ormstad K. Sexual assault centers: attendance rates, and differences between early and late presenting cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:707-15.
17. Laudrup C, Rahbæk H. Var det voldtægt: en undersøgelse af menneskerettigheder og voldtægtssager i Danmark [Rape: human rights and police-reported rape]. København: Rigshospitalet, 2006.
18. Kilpatrick D, Resnick H, Ruggiero K, Conoscenti LM, McCauley J. Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: a national study. National Criminal Justice Reference Service, 2007, (accessed April 7, 2009).
19. Jordan J. Beyond belief?: police, rape and women's credibility. Criminal Justice 2004;4:29-59.
20. Kelly L, Lovett J, Regan L. A gap or a chasm?: attrition in reported rape cases. London, UK: Home Office-Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2005.
21. Koss MP, Bachar KJ, Hopkins CQ, Carlson C. Expanding a community's justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: introducing the RESTORE program. J Interpers Violence 2004;19:1435-63.
22. Telsavaara TVT, Arrigo BA. DNA evidence in rape cases and The Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2006;50:487-505.
23. Spohn C, Beichner D, Davis-Frenzel E. Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: guarding the "gateway to justice." Soc Probl 2001;48:206-35.
24. Kilpatrick DG, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R, Saunders BE, Resnick HS, Best CL, et al. Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:692-700.
25. Resnick HS, Acierno R, Kilpatrick DG. Health impact of interpersonal violence.2: medical and mental health outcomes. Behav Med 1997;23:65-78.
26. UN Convention on justice and support for victims of crime and abuse of power. Tilburg University, 2006, (accessed April 7, 2009).
27. United Nations. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. United Nations, 2009, (accessed March 27, 2009).
28. Sletner R. Fra ord til handling: bekjempelse av voldtekt krever handling: utredning fra et utvalg oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 1. September 2006: avgitt til Justis- og politidepartementet 24. januar 2008 [Rape: from words to action]. Oslo, Norway: Departementenes Servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning, 2008.
29. Soknes B, Nielsen SS, Sundet K, Nilssen SW, Davik T. En undersøkelse av kvaliteten på påtalevedtak i voldtektssaker som har endt med frifinnelse m.v [Quality in deciding rape charges]. Oslo, Norway: Riksadvokaten [The Director of Public Prosecutions], 2007.