Hungarian landscape types: Classification of landscapes based on the relative cover of (semi-) natural habitats

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-546

  Bölöni, János ^a   Botta Dukát, Zoltán ^a   Illyés, Eszter ^a   Molnár, Zsolt ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Beta diversity; Classification; Landscape types; Rao's quadratic entropy; Sigma syntaxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052441732     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: 1654109X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01139.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aho, K., Roberts, D.W. & Weaver, T. 2008. Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 549-562.
2. Báldi, A., Batáry, P. & Erdo{double acute}s, S. 2005. Effects of grazing intensity on bird assemblages and populations of Hungarian grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108: 251-263.
3. Bohn, U. & Neuhäusl, R. (eds.) 2000. Map of the natural vegetation of Europe. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, DE.
4. Borhidi, A. 2003. Magyarország növénytársulásai (Plant communities of Hungary). Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, HU.
5. Botta-Dukát, Z. 2005. Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 533-540.
6. Bölöni, J., Molnár, Z., Illyés, E. & Kun, A. 2007. A new habitat classification and manual for standardized habitat mapping. Annali de Botanica Nuova Serie 7: 105-126.
7. Bölöni, J., Molnár, Z., Biró, M. & Horváth, F. 2008. Distribution of the (semi-)natural habitats in Hungary II. Woodlands and shrublands. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 107-148.
8. Bruelheide, H. & Chytrý, M. 2000. Towards unification of the national vegetation classifications: a comparison of two methods for the analysis of large data sets. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 295-306.
9. Brundu, G. & Camarda, I. 2005. Integration of remote sensing and HIS for mapping and spatial modeling vegetation in the Supramonte mountain area (Central East Sardinia). Annali de Botanica Nuova Serie 5: 183-192.
10. Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J., Gillespie, M.K. & Howard, D.C. 1996. The ITE land classification: providing an environmental stratification of Great Britain. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39: 39-46.
11. Büttner, G., Bíró, M., Maucha, G. & Petrik, O. 2000. Land-cover mapping at scale 1:50 000 in Hungary: lessons learnt from the European CORINE programme. In: Buchroitner, M.F. (ed.) A decade of trans-European remote sensing cooperation. Proceedings of the 20th EARSel Symposium Dresden. pp. 25-31. A.A.Balkema Publ., Rotterdam, NL.
12. Chiarucci, A., Araújó, M.B., Decocq, G., Beierkuhnlein, C. & Fernández-Palacios, J.M. 2010. The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1172-1178.
13. Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Holt, J. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2002. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 79-90.
14. Cingolani, A.M., Renison, D., Zak, M.R. & Cabido, M.R. 2004. Mapping vegetation in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland using landsat data: an alternative method to define and classify land-cover units. Remote Sensing of Environment 92: 84-97.
15. Council Directive 92/43/EEC 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
16. Cudlín, P., Prokopová, M., Francírková, T., Burešová, R., Smrž, T. & Boucníková, E. 2005. Biotope evaluation in the Upper Stropnice Watershed (South Bohemia) using modified hessian method. Ekológia (Bratislava) 24: 52-68.
17. de Bello, F., Lavergne, S., Meynard, C.N., Lepš, J. & Thuiller, W. 2010. The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 992-1000.
18. De Cáceres, M. & Legendre, P. 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90: 3566-3574.
19. Dierschke, H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie - Grundlagen und Methoden. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
20. Dövényi, Z. (ed.) 2010. Magyarország kistájainak katasztere. MTA Földrajztudományi Kutatóintézet, Budapest, HU.
21. Groom, G., Mücher, C., Ihse, M. & Wrbka, T. 2006. Remote sensing in landscape ecology: experiences and perspectives in a European context. Landscape Ecology 21: 391-408.
22. Guth, J. & Kučera, T. 2005. Natura 2000 Habitat mapping in the Czech Republic: methods and general Results. Ekológia (Bratislava) 24: 39-51.
23. Haines-Young, R.H. 1992. The use of remotely-sensed satellite imagery for landscape classification in Wales (U.K.). Landscape Ecology 7: 253-274.
24. Halász, G. 2006. Magyarország erdészeti tájai. (Forestry regions of Hungary.). Hungarian Forest Authority, Budapest, HU.
25. Hall, O. & Arnberg, W. 2002. A method for landscape regionalization based on fuzzy membership signatures. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 227-240.
26. Horváth, F. & Polgár, L. 2008. MÉTA SQL expert interface and access service. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 35-45.
27. Horváth, F., Molnár, Z., Bölöni, J., Pataki, Z., Polgár, L., Révész, A., Krasser, D. & Illyés, E. 2008. Fact sheet of the MÉTA Database 1.2. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 11-34.
28. Izsák, J. & Papp, L. 2000. A link between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity. Ecological Modelling 130: 151-156.
29. Jongman, R., Bunce, R., Metzger, M., Mücher, C., Howard, D. & Mateus, V. 2006. Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecology 21: 409-419.
30. Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427-2439.
31. Kaufman, L. & Rousseeuw, P.J. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York, NY, US.
32. Keresztesi, Z., Marosi, S., Pécsi, M. & Somogyi, S. 1989. Taxonomic distribution of natural landscape units. In: Pécsi, M. (ed.) National atlas of Hungary. pp. 86-87. Kartográfia Vállalat, Budapest, HU.
33. Koleff, P., Gaston, K.J. & Lennon, J.J. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 367-382.
34. Kratochwil, A. & Schwabe, A. 2001. Ökologie der Lebensgemeinschaftan: Biozönologie. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
35. Loidi, J. 1999. Preserving biodiversity in the European Union: the Habitats Directive and its application in Spain. Plant Biosystems 133: 99-106.
36. Mücher, C.A., Klijn, J.A., Wascher, D.M. & Schaminée, J.H.J. 2010. A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): a transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators 10: 87-103.
37. Milligan, G.W. & Cooper, M.C. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50: 159-179.
38. Molnár, Z., Biró, M., Büttner, G. & Taracsák, G. 2001. CORINE Habitat Database. Prepared for the designation of areas for the EU Habitats Directive. Institute of Ecology and Botany of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Remote Sensing Institute (FÖMI), V á cr á t ó t-Budapest, HU.
39. Molnár, Z., Bartha, S., Seregélyes, T., Illyés, E., Botta-Dukát, Z., Tímár, G., Horváth, F., Révész, A., Kun, A., Bölöni, J., Biró, M., Bodonczi, L., Deák, J.Á., Fogarasi, P., Horváth, A., Isépy, I., Karas, L., Kecskés, F., Molnár, C., Ortmann-né Ajkai, A. & Rév, S. 2007. A grid-based, satellite-image supported, multi-attributed vegetation mapping method (MÉTA). Folia Geobotanica 42: 225-247.
40. Molnár, Z., Biró, M., Bölöni, J. & Horváth, F. 2008. Distribution of the (semi-)natural habitats in Hungary I. Marshes and grasslands. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 59-106.
41. Niklfeld, H. 1973. Natürliche Vegetation. In: Niklfeld, H. (ed.) Atlas der Donauländer. Österreichische Ost- und Südosteuropa Institute, Wien, AT.
42. Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics. Ecological computations series. SPB, The Hague, NL.
43. Rao, C.R. 1982. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology 21: 24-43.
44. Ricotta, C. 2004. A parametric diversity measure combining the relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Diversity and Distributions 10: 143-146.
45. Rivas-Martínez, S., Asensi, A., Costa, M., Fernández-González, F., Llorens, L., Masalles, R., Molero Mesa, J., Penas, A. & Pérez de Paz, P.L. 1994. El proyecto de cartografía e inventariación de los tipos de hábitats de la Directiva 92/43/CEE en Espańa. Colloques Phytosociologiques 22: 611-661.
46. Schaminée, J.H.J., Hennekens, S.M., Chytrý, M. & Rodwell, J.S. 2009. Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia 81: 173-185.
47. Schmidtlein, S. 2000. Aufnahme von Vegetationsmustern auf Landschaftsebene. Nationalpark Berchtesgaden, Berchtesgaden, DE.
48. Schwabe, A. 1989. Vegetation complexes of flowing-water habitats and their importance for the differentiation of landscape units. Landscape Ecology 2: 237-253.
49. Simon, T. 2000. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, HU.
50. Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S.S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010. OptimClass: using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 287-299.
51. Tuomisto, H. 2010. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33: 2-22.
52. Tüxen, R. 1973. Vorschlag zur Aufnahme von Gesellschaftskomplexen in potentiell natürlichen Vegetationseinheiten. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19: 379-384.
53. Várallyay, G. 1985. Magyarország 1:100 000 méretarányú agrotopográfiai térképe. (1:100 000 scale agrotopographic map of Hungary.). Agrokémia és Talajtan 34: 243-248.
54. Vendramin, L., Campello, R.J.G.B. & Hruschka, E.R. 2010. Relative clustering validity criteria: a comparative overview. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 3: 209-235.
55. Whittingham, M.J., Krebs, J.R., Swetnam, R.D., Vickery, J.A., Wilson, J.D. & Freckleton, R.P. 2007. Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. Ecology Letters 10: 25-35.
56. Zólyomi, B. 1989. Map of the natural vegetation of Hungary. In: Pécsi, M. (ed.) National atlas of Hungary. pp. 89 Kartográfia Vállalat, Budapest, HU.