|
Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 712-720
|
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measurement comparability between paper and alternate versions, using the lung function questionnaire as an example
|
Author keywords
alternate versions; comparability; COPD; Lung Function Questionnaire; patient reported outcomes; psychometrics; screening
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL EVALUATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DEMOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE SYSTEM;
KAPPA STATISTICS;
LUNG FUNCTION;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PAPER;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
WEB BROWSER;
ADULT;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
DATA COLLECTION;
HUMANS;
INTERNET;
INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC;
LUNG;
LUNG DISEASES;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT PREFERENCE;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
PSYCHOMETRICS;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS;
SELF REPORT;
TELECOMMUNICATIONS;
UNITED STATES;
VOICE;
|
EID: 80052441684
PISSN: 10983015
EISSN: 15244733
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.007 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (15)
|