Vegetation survey: A new focus for Applied Vegetation Science

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 435-439

  Chytrý, Milan ^a   Schaminée, Joop H J ^b   Schwabe, Angelika ^c  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Phytosociology; Plant community types; Survey methods; Vegetation classification; Vegetation types

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052441333     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: 1654109X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01154.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Berg, C., Dengler, J., Abdank, A. & Isermann, M. 20012004. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung. Weissdorn, Jena, DE.
2. Bölöni, J., Botta-Dukát, Z., Illyés, E. & Molnár, Z. 2011. Hungarian landscape types: classification of landscapes based on the relative cover of (semi-)natural habitats. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 537-546.
3. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1928. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer, Wien, AT.
4. Bray, J.R. & Curtis, J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325-349.
5. Chiarucci, A., Pärtel, M., Díaz, S. & Wilson, J.B. 2010. Applied vegetation science in 2010: new opportunities for the vegetation scientists. Applied Vegetation Science 13: 1-4.
6. Chytrý, M. (ed.) 2007. Vegetace České republiky 1. Travinná a keříčková vegetace (Vegetation of the Czech Republic 1. Grassland and heathland vegetation). Academia, Praha, CZ.
7. Chytrý, M., Chiarucci, A., Pärtel, M. & Wilson, J.B. 2011. Journal development, vegetation survey and the restoration of invaded ecosystems. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 1-5.
8. Clements, F.E. 1905. Research methods in ecology. University Publishing Company, Lincoln, NE, US.
9. Daubenmire, R.F. 1952. Forest vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetation classification. Ecological Monographs 22: 301-330.
10. Daubenmire, R.F. 1968. Plant communities: a textbook of plant synecology. Harper and Row, New York, NY, US.
11. De Cáceres, M., Font, X., Vicente, P. & Oliva, F. 2009. Numerical reproduction of traditional classifications and automatic vegetation identification. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 620-628.
12. Dengler, J., Jansen, F., Glöckner, F., Peet, R.K., De Cáceres, M., Chytrý, M., Ewald, J., Oldeland, J., Lopez-Gonzales, G., Finckh, M., Mucina, L., Rodwell, J.S., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Spencer, N. 2011. The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 582-597.
13. Ermakov, N. & Morozova, O. 2011. Syntaxonomical survey of boreal oligotrophic pine forests in northern Europe and Western Siberia. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 524-536.
14. Faber-Langendoen, D., Tart, D.L. & Crawford, R.H. 2009. Contours of the revised U.S. national vegetation classification standard. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 90: 87-93.
15. e Congrès International de Botanique. Bruxelles, 14-22 mai. Zürcher & Furrer, Zürich, CH.
16. Goodall, D.W. 1953. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. I. The use of positive interspecific correlation. Australian Journal of Botany 1: 39-63.
17. Goodall, D.W. 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Australian Journal of Botany 2: 304-324.
18. Hennekens, S.M. & Schaminée, J.H.J. 2001. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 589-591.
19. Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. Journal of Ecology 61: 237-249.
20. Jennings, M.D., Faber-Langendoen, D., Loucks, O.L., Peet, R.K. & Roberts, D. 2009. Standards for associations and alliances of the US national vegetation classification. Ecological Monographs 79: 173-199.
21. Korotkov, K.O., Morozova, O.V. & Belonovskaya, E.A. 1991. The USSR vegetation syntaxa prodromus. G.E.Vilchek, Moscow, RU.
22. Matthews, E.R., Peet, R.K. & Weakley, A.S. 2011. Classification and description of alluvial plant communities of the Piedmont region, North Carolina, USA. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 485-505.
23. Miehe, G., Bach, K., Miehe, S., Kluge, J., Yongping, Y., Duo, L., Co, S. & Wesche, K. 2011. Alpine steppe plant communities of the Tibetan highland. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 547-560.
24. Mirkin, B.M. 1987. Paradigm change and vegetation classification in Soviet phytocoenology. Vegetatio 68: 131-138.
25. Miyawaki, A. (ed.) 19811989. Vegetation of Japan. Shibundo, Tokyo, JP (in Japanese).
26. Moravec, J. 1989. Influences of the individualistic concept of vegetation on syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81: 29-39.
27. Mucina, L. & Rutherford, M.C. (eds) 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, ZA.
28. Mucina, L. & van der Maarel, E. 1989. Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81: 1-15.
29. Peinado, M., Ocaña-Peinado, F.M., Aguirre, J.L., Delgadillo, J., Macías, M.Á. & Díaz-Santiago, G. 2011. A phytosociological and phytogeographical survey of the coastal vegetation of western North America: beach and dune vegetation from Baja California to Alaska. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 464-484.
30. Rodwell, J.S. 1991-2000. British plant communities. Vols 1-5, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. Rodwell, J.S., Pignatti, S., Mucina, L. & Schaminée, J.H.J. 1995. European vegetation survey - update on progress. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 759-762.
32. Schaminée, J.H.J., Stortelder, A.H.F., Westhoff, V., Weeda, E.J. & Hommel, P.W.F.M. 19951999. De vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 1-5. Opulus Press, Uppsala, SE.
33. Schaminée, J.H.J., Hennekens, S.M. & Ozinga, W.A. 2007. Use of the ecological information system SynBioSys for the analysis of large databases. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 463-470.
34. Schaminée, J.H.J., Hennekens, S.M., Chytrý, M. & Rodwell, J.S. 2009. Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia 81: 173-185.
35. Schmidtlein, S., Tichý, L., Feilhauer, H. & Faude, U. 2010. A brute-force approach to vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1162-1171.
36. Schröter, C. & Kirchner, O. 18861902. Die Vegetation des Bodensees. Stettner, Lindau, DE.
37. Schwabe, A. & Kratochwil, A. 2011. Classification of biogeographical and ecological phenomena. In: Millington, A.C., Blumler, M.A., MacDonald, G. & Schickhoff, U. (eds) The Sage handbook of biogeography, pp. 75-98. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, US.
38. Talbot, S.S. 2009. Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM). Working Group of the IAVS. IAVS Bulletin 12: 12-17.
39. Tichý, L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 451-453.
40. Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S.S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010. OptimClass: using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 287-299.
41. Walker, D.A., Raynolds, M.K., Daniëls, F.J.A., Einarsson, E., Elvebakk, A., Gould, W.A., Katenin, A.E., Kholod, S.S., Markon, C.J., Melnikov, E.S., Moskalenko, N.G., Talbot, S.S. & Yurtsev, B.A. 2005. The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 267-282.
42. Walker, D.A., Kuss, P., Epstein, H.E., Kade, A.N., Vonlanthen, C.M., Raynolds, M.K. & Daniëls, F.J.A. 2011. Vegetation of zonal patterned-ground ecosystems along the North America Arctic bioclimate gradient. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 440-463.
43. Warming, E. 1895. Plantesamfund - Grundtræk af den økologiske plantegeografi. P.G. Philipsens, København, DK.
44. Werger, M.J.A. 1973. Phytosociology of the Upper Orange River valley, South Africa. A syntaxonomical and synecological study. PhD thesis, Catholic University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, NL.
45. Wesche, K. & von Wehrden, H. 2011. Surveying Southern Mongolia: application of multivariate classification methods in drylands with low diversity and long floristic gradients. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 561-570.
46. Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R.H. (ed.) Ordination and classification of communities, pp. 617-726. W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
47. Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26: 1-80.
48. Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews 42: 207-264.
49. Whittaker, R.H. (ed.) 1973. Ordination and classification of communities. W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
50. Whittaker, R.J. 2010. Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. Ecology 91: 2522-2533.
51. Williams, W.T. & Lambert, J.M. 1959. Multivariate methods in plant ecology: I. Association-analysis in plant communities. Journal of Ecology 47: 83-101.
52. Wiser, S.K., Hurst, J.M., Wright, E.F. & Allen, R.B. 2011. New Zealand's forest and shrubland communities: a quantitative classification based on a nationally representative plot network. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 506-523.