The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: A comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD)

Value in Health

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 732-739

  Gerhards, Sylvia A H ^a   Huibers, Marcus J H ^a   Theunissen, Kevin A T M ^a,b   De Graaf, L Esther ^c   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^b,d   Evers, Silvia M A A ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

depression; depression free day; EQ 5D; quality of life utility; SF 6D; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSION FREE DAY; EUROQOL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 6D;

ADULT; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052435939     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. R.V. Bijl, and A. Ravelli Current and residual functional disability associated with psychopathology: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Psychol Med 30 2000 657 668 (Pubitemid 30410328)
2. M.E. Kruijshaar, N. Hoeymans, and R.V. Bijl Levels of disability in major depression Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) J Affect Disord 77 2003 53 64 (Pubitemid 37205151)
3. M.F. Drummond, M.J. Sculpher, and G.W. Torrance Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes 2005 Oxford University Press Oxford
4. S.A.H. Gerhards, L.E. de Graaf, and L.E. Jacobs Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial Br J Psychiatry 196 2010 310 318
5. P. McCrone, A. Patel, and M. Knapp A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia J Ment Health Policy Econ 12 2009 27 31
6. O.H. Gnther, C. Roick, and M.C. Angermeyer The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: a comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning J Affect Disord 105 2008 81 91 (Pubitemid 350236353)
7. G.H. Guyatt, D. Osoba, and A.W. Wu Methods to explain clinical significance of health status measures Mayo Clin Proc 77 2002 371 383 (Pubitemid 34260746)
8. J.M. Pyne, S. Tripathi, and D.K. Williams Depression-free day to utility-weighted score Is it valid? Med Care 45 2007 357 362
9. J.R. Lave, R.G. Frank, and H.C. Schulberg Cost-effectiveness of treatments for major depression in primary care practice Arch Gen Psychiatry 55 1998 645 651 (Pubitemid 28340354)
10. P. McCrone, M. Knapp, and J. Proudfoot Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial Br J Psychiatry 185 2004 55 62 (Pubitemid 38951630)
11. F.A. Sava, B.T. Yates, and V. Lupu Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cognitive therapy, rational emotive behavioural therapy, and fluoxetine (Prozac) in treating depression: a randomized clinical trial J Clin Psychol 65 2009 36 52
12. C.C.M. Jonkers, F. Lamers, and S.M.A.A. Evers Economic evaluation of a minimal psychological intervention in chronically ill elderly patients with minor or mild to moderate depression: a randomized trial (the DELTA-study) Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25 2009 497 504
13. W. Katon, J. Untzer, and M.Y. Fan Cost-effectiveness and net-benefit of enhanced treatment of depression for older adults with diabetes and depression Diabetes Care 29 2006 265 270 (Pubitemid 44106502)
14. W.J. Katon, M. Schoenbaum, and M.Y. Fan Cost-effectiveness of improving primary care treatment of late-life depression Arch Gen Psychiatry 62 2005 1313 1320 (Pubitemid 41746609)
15. M.E. Domino, E.M. Foster, and B. Vitiello Relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for adolescent depression: 36-week results from the TADS randomized trial J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48 2009 711 720
16. F.L. Lynch, M. Hornbrook, and G.N. Clarke Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to prevent depression in at-risk teens Arch Gen Psychiatry 62 2005 1241 1248 (Pubitemid 41586923)
17. D.A. Revicki, J. Siddique, and L. Frank Cost-effectiveness of evidence-based pharmacotherapy or cognitive behavior therapy compared with community referral for major depression in predominantly low-income minority women Arch Gen Psychiatry 62 2005 868 875 (Pubitemid 41126881)
18. M.H. Trivedi, G.J. Wan, and R. Mallick Cost and effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the acute phase of outpatient treatment for major depressive disorder J Clin Psychopharmacol 24 2004 497 506 (Pubitemid 39294705)
19. G.E. Simon, W.J. Katon, and M. Von Korff Cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care program for primary care patients with persistent depression Am J Psychiatry 158 2001 1638 1644 (Pubitemid 32923656)
20. G.E. Simon, M. Von Korff, and E.J. Ludman Cost-effectiveness of a program to prevent depression relapse in primary care Med Care 40 2002 941 950
21. G.E. Simon, W.G. Manning, and D.J. Katzelnick Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care Arch Gen Psychiatry 58 2001 181 187 (Pubitemid 32142756)
22. C.C.M. Jonkers, F. Lamers, and S.M.A.A. Evers Cost-utility estimates in depression: does the valuation method matter? C.C.M. Jonkers, Emotional support for chronically ill elderly persons: feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention [PhD dissertation] 2009 Universitaire Pers Maastricht Maastricht, The Netherlands
23. D. Revicki, R.D. Hays, and D. Cella Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 102 109
24. L.E. de Graaf, S.A.H. Gerhards, and A.R. Arntz Clinical effectiveness of online computerized cognitive behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: a randomized trial Br J Psychiatry 195 2009 73 80
25. L.E. de Graaf, S.A.H. Gerhards, and S.M.A.A. Evers Clinical and cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care: design of a randomised trial BMC Public Health 8 2008 224
26. A.T. Beck, R.A. Steer, and R. Ball Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients J Pers Assess 67 1996 588 597 (Pubitemid 26382973)
27. R.C. Arnau, M.W. Meagher, and M.P. Norris Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients Health Psychol 20 2001 112 119 (Pubitemid 32233867)
28. A.J.W. Van der Does De Nederlandse versie van de Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition (BDI-II-NL): Handleiding [The Dutch version of the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition (BDI-II-NL): Manual] 2002 The Psychological Corporation Enschede, The Netherlands
29. R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play Health Policy 37 1996 53 72 (Pubitemid 26191458)
30. EuroQol Group EuroQola new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life Health Policy 16 1990 199 208
31. P. Dolan Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states Med Care 35 1997 1095 1108 (Pubitemid 127453463)
32. L.M. Lamers, J. McDonnell, and P.F.M. Stalmeier The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies Health Econ 15 2006 1121 1132 (Pubitemid 44596379)
33. J. Brazier, J. Roberts, and M. Deverill The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 J Health Econ 21 2002 271 292 (Pubitemid 34143147)
34. J.E. Brazier, and J. Roberts The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12 Med Care 42 2004 851 859 (Pubitemid 39456916)
35. N.S. Jacobson, and P. Truax Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research J Consult Clin Psychol 59 1991 12 19
36. C. Evans, F. Margison, and M. Barkham The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health Evid Based Ment Health 1 1998 70 72
37. S.J. Walters, and J.E. Brazier Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D Qual Life Res 14 2005 1523 1532 (Pubitemid 40848233)
38. S.J. Walters, and J.E. Brazier What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D Health Qual Life Outcomes 1 2003
39. J.A. Husted, R.J. Cook, and V.T. Farewell Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 53 2000 459 468 (Pubitemid 30254341)
40. M.H. Liang, A.H. Fossel, and M.G. Larson Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation Med Care 28 1990 632 642
41. J. Cohen Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
42. K.O. McGraw, and S.P. Wong Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psych Methods 1 1996 30 46 (Pubitemid 126421252)
43. J.L. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions 1981 Wiley New York
44. L.G. Portney, and M.P. Watkins Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice 2000 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
45. L.E. de Graaf, S.A.H. Gerhards, and A. Arntz One-year follow-up results of unsupported online computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care: a randomized trial J Behav Ther Exp Psy 42 2011 89 95
46. L.M. Lamers, C.A.M. Bouwmans, and A. van Straten Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients Health Econ 15 2006 1229 1236 (Pubitemid 44696950)
47. S. Bryan, and L. Longworth Measuring health-related utility: why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D? Eur J Health Econ 50 2005 253 360
48. S. Knies, S.M.A.A. Evers, and M.J.J.M. Candel Utilities of the EQ-5D Transferable or not? Pharmacoeconomics 27 2009 767 779
49. G.R. Barton, T.H. Sach, and M. Doherty An assessment of the discriminative ability of the EQ-5Dindex, SF-6D, and EQ VAS using sociodemographic factors and clinical conditions Eur J Health Econ 9 2008 237 249 (Pubitemid 351962397)
50. C.A. Marra, J.C. Woolcott, and J.A. Kopec A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis Soc Sci Med 60 2005 1571 1582 (Pubitemid 40126441)
51. B.B. Lee, M.T. King, and J.M. Simpson Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population Value Health 11 2008 680 688 (Pubitemid 352032821)
52. J. Brazier, and M. Deverill A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics Health Econ 8 1999 41 51 (Pubitemid 29057354)
53. M. Ross Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories Psychol Rev 96 1989 341 357
54. G.R. Norman, P. Stratford, and G. Regehr Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach J Clin Epidemiol 50 1997 869 879 (Pubitemid 27423516)
55. C.E. Schwartz, and M.A.G. Sprangers Adaptation to changing health: response shift in quality-of-life research 2000 American Psychological Association Washington
56. G.R. Barton, T.H. Sach, and A.J. Avery A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged <45 years Health Econ 17 2008 815 832
57. J. Brazier, J. Roberts, and A. Tsuchiya A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups Health Econ 13 2004 873 884 (Pubitemid 39264234)
58. N. Kontodimopoulos, E. Pappa, and A.A. Papadopoulos Comparing SF-6D and EQ-5D utilities across groups differing in health status Qual Life Res 18 2009 87 97