Use of high-density marker genotyping for genetic improvement of livestock by genomic selection

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 5, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Dekkers, Jack C M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal breeding; Genetic selection; Marker assisted selection; Molecular genetics

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 80052430851     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20105037     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Falconer DS, McKay TFC. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Harlow, UK; 1996. xii, 438p
2. Henderson CR. Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; 1984.
3. Lynch MWB. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA; 1998.
4. Dekkers JCM, Hospital F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nature Reviews Genetetics 2002;3:22-32. (Pubitemid 34506601)
5. Andersson L. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nature 2001;2:130-8. (Pubitemid 33674004)
6. Weller JL. Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis in Animals. CABI, Cambridge, MA; 2009.
7. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Review Genetics 2009;10:381-91.
8. Dekkers JCM. Commercial application of marker-and geneassisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. Journal of Animal Science 2004;82(E-Suppl):E313-28.
9. Boichard D, Fritz S, Rossignol MN, Guillaume F, Colleau JJ, Druet T. Implementation of marker assisted selection: practical lessons from dairy cattle. 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 13-18 August 2006; Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
10. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2007;124:323-30. (Pubitemid 350231124)
11. Wong GKS, Liu B, Wang J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Zhang Z et al. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million singlenucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 2004;432:717-22.
12. Van Tassell CP, Smith TPL, Matukumalli LK, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, Lawley CT et al. SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nature Methods 2008;5:247-52. (Pubitemid 351325649)
13. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001;157:1819-29. (Pubitemid 32298846)
14. Lande R, Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 1990;124:743-56. (Pubitemid 20106345)
15. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF et al. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 2009;92:16-24.
16. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 2009;92:433-43.
17. Loberg A, Durr J. Interbull Survey on the Use of Genomic Information. Proc. Interbull International Workshop, 2009, www-interbull.slu.se, Uppsala, Sweden; 2009. p. 3-14.
18. Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Science 2009;49:1-12.
19. Hill WG, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genetics 2008;4(2):e1000008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen. 1000008.
20. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 2009;183:347-63.
21. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007;177:2389-97. (Pubitemid 350277013)
22. Calus MPL. Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal 2010;4:157-64.
23. Gianola D, Fernando RL, Stella A. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics 2006;173:1761-76. (Pubitemid 44127674)
24. Bennewitz J, Solberg T, Meuwissen T. Genomic breeding value estimation using nonparametric additive regression models. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:20, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-20.
25. Gonzalez-Recio O, Gianola D, Long N, Weigel KA, Rosa GJ, Avendano S et al. Nonparametric methods for incorporating genomic information into genetic evaluations: an application to mortality in broilers. Genetics 2008;178:2305-13.
26. Gianola D, van Kaam JBCHM. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 2008;178:2289-303.
27. Raadsma HW, Zenger KR, Khatkar MS, Crump R, Moser G, Solkner J et al. Genome wide selection in dairy cattle based on high-density genome-wide SNP analysis: from discovery to application. In: Legarra A, editor. Proceedings XI QTLMAS 2007. Toulouse. INRA, Castanet Tolosan, France; 2007. p. 77. Available from: URL: http://germinal.toulouse.inra.fr/qtlmas/
28. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:29, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-29.
29. de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E et al. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 2009;182:375-85.
30. Beavis WD. QTL analyses: power, precision and accuracy. In: Paterson H, editor. Molecular dissection of complex traits, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1998. p. 145-59.
31. Xu SZ. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics 2003;163:789-801.
32. Rothschild MF, Soller M. Candidate gene analysis to detect traits of economic importance in domestic livestock. Probe 1997;8:13.
33. Smith C, Smith DB. The need for close linkages in markerassisted selection for economic merit in livestock. Animal Breeding Abstracts 1993;61:197-204.
34. Henderson CR. Selecting the young sire to sample in artificial insemination. Journal of Dairy Science 1964;47:439-41.
35. Meuwissen THE. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 1997;75:934-40.
36. Wray NR, Wooliams JA, Thompson R. Methods for predicting rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1990;80:503-12.
37. Avendano S, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B. Prediction of accuracy of estimated Mendelian sampling terms. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2005;122:302-8. (Pubitemid 41360818)
38. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2007;124:369-76. (Pubitemid 350231129)
39. Dekkers JCM, van der Werf JHJ. Strategies, limitations and opportunities for marker-assisted selection in livestock. In: Guimaraes EP, Ruane J, Scherf BD, Sonnino A, Dargie JD, editors. Marker-assisted Selection: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Crops, Livestock, Forestry and Fish. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy; 2007.
40. Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME. The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes. Genetics Selection Evolution 1996;28:161-76. (Pubitemid 126633494)
41. Kashi Y, Hallerman E, Soller M. Marker-assisted selection of candidate bulls for progeny testing programmes. Animal Production 1990;51:63-74.
42. Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2006;123:218-23. (Pubitemid 44049951)
43. Konig S, Swalve HH. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 2009;92:5292-303.
44. Dekkers JCM, Zhao HH, Habier D, Fernando RL. Opportunities for genomic selection with redesign of breeding programs. Montreal, Canada; Journal of Animal Science 2009;87(E-Suppl. 2), Abstract No. 275.
45. Georges M, Massey JM. Velogenetics, or the synergistic use of marker assisted selection and germ-line manipulation. Theriogenology 1991;25:151-9.
46. Haley CS, Visscher PM. Strategies to utilize markerquantitative trait loci associations. Journal of Dairy Science 1998;81:85-97. (Pubitemid 128451836)
47. Visscher P, Pong-Wong R, Whittemore C, Haley C. Impact of biotechnology on (cross) breeding programmes in pigs. Livestock Production Science 2000;65:57-70. (Pubitemid 30329536)
48. Sonesson AK. Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species. Genetics Selection Evolution 2007;39:301-17. (Pubitemid 47124202)
49. Hayes B, Goddard ME. Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises. Livestock Production Science 2003;81:197-211. (Pubitemid 36610387)
50. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen TH. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:37, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37.
51. Toosi A, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection of purebreds using data from admixed populations. Journal of Animal Science 2010;88:32-46.
52. de Roos AP, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 2009;183:1545-53.
53. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:51, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-51.
54. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ. Genomic Selection in New Zealand and the Implications for National Genetic Evaluation. ICAR Technical Series: Identification, Breeding, Production, Health and Recording of Farm Animals. ICAR, Rome, 2009.
55. de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 2008;179:1503-12.
56. Goddard ME. How Can We Best Use DNA Data in Selection of Cattle? Beef Improvement Federation, Sacramento, CA; 2009.
57. Wei M, Werf JHJVD, Brascamp EW. Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters. II. Genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance under the model with two loci. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 1991;108:262-9.
58. Wei M, van der Steen HAM. Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding (a review). Animal Breeding Abstract 1991;59:281-98.
59. Dekkers JC. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance. Journal Animal Science 2007;85:2104-14. (Pubitemid 47340374)
60. Bijma P, van Arendonk JAM. Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information. Animal Science 1998;66:529-42.
61. Ibanez-Escriche N, Fernando RL, Toosi A, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:12.
62. Kosgey IS, Kahi AK, Van Arendonk JA. Evaluation of closed adult nucleus multiple ovulation and embryo transfer and conventional progeny testing breeding schemes for milk production in tropical crossbred cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 2005;88:1582-94. (Pubitemid 41431278)
63. Bosso NA, Corr N, Njie M, Fall A, Van der Waaij EH, Van Arendonk J. A. M., et al. The N'Dama Cattle Genetic Improvement Programme: a review. Animal Genetic Resources Information 2007;40:65069.
64. Cunningham EP. The application of biotechnologies to enhance animal production in different farming systems. Livestock Production Science 1999;58:1-24. (Pubitemid 29150607)
65. Dekkers JC. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of Animal Breeding Genetics 2007;124:331-41. (Pubitemid 350231125)
66. Woolliams JA. Modifications to MOET nucleus breeding schemes to improve rates of genetic progress and decrease rates of inbreeding in dairy cattle. Animal Production 1989;49:1-14.
67. Muir WM. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2007;124:342-55. (Pubitemid 350231126)
68. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. Journal of Animal Science 2008;86:2447-54.
69. Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009;136:245-57.
70. Meuwissen TH. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:35, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-35.
71. Weigel KA, de los Campos G, Gonzalez-Recio O, Naya H, Wu XL, Long N et al. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:5248-57.
72. Goddard ME. The use of high density genotyping in animal health. In: Pinard M-H, Gay C, Pastoret P-P, Dodet B, editors. Animal Genomics for Animal Health. Developments in Biologicals; 132. Karger, Basel, Switzerland; 2008. p. 383-90.
73. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 2008;91:4414-23.
74. Fernando RL. Genetic Evaluation and Selection Using Genotypic, Phenotypic and Pedigree Information. Animal Breeding and Genetics Unit, University of Australia, Armidale, Australia; 1998. p. 329-36.
75. Zhang Z, Todhunter RJ, Buckler ES, Van Vleck LD. Technical note: use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood. Journal of Animal Science 2007;85:881-5. (Pubitemid 46651826)
76. Legarra A, Misztal I. Technical note: computing strategies in genome-wide selection. Journal of Dairy Science 2008;91:360-6. (Pubitemid 351455852)
77. Stranden I, Garrick DJ. Technical note: derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. Journal of Dairy Science 2009;92:2971-5.
78. Hill WG. Variation in genetic identity within kinships. Heredity 1993;71:652-3. (Pubitemid 2029632)
79. Guo SW. Variation in genetic identity among relatives. Human Heredity 1996;46:61-70.
80. Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 2009;92:4656-63.
81. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Technical note: prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices. Journal of Animal Science 2008;86:2089-92.
82. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. Journal of Animal Science 1997;75:1738-45. (Pubitemid 127444988)
83. Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernandez J, Toro MA. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. Journal of Animal Science 2005;83:1747-52.
84. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetical Research 2009;91:47-60.
85. Legarra A, Robert-granie C, Manfredi E, Elsen J-M. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 2008;180:611-8.
86. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 2010;42:5, doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5.
87. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, Windig JJ, Knol EF, Schrooten C, Vereijkin ALJ et al. Effects of the number of markers per haplotype and clustering of haplotypes on the accuracy of QTL mapping and prediction of genomic breeding values. Genetics Selection Evolution 2009;41:11.
88. Kizilkaya K, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ. Genomic prediction of simulated multi-breed and purebred performance using observed 50k SNP genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 2010;88:544-51.
89. Fernando RL, Habier D, Stricker C, Dekkers JCM, Totir LR. Genomic selection. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 2007;57:192-5. (Pubitemid 351489142)
90. Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2007;124:362-8. (Pubitemid 350231128)
91. Fernando RL, Grossman M. Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution 1989;21:467-77.
92. Meuwissen THE, Karlsen A, Lien S, Olsaker I, Goddard ME. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genetics 2002;161:373-9. (Pubitemid 34564064)
93. Fernando RL, Totir LR. Incorporating Molecular Information in Breeding Programs: Methodology. Poultry Breeding and Biotechnology. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, UK; 2003.
94. Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME. Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genetics Selection Evolution 2004;36:261-79. (Pubitemid 38630134)
95. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, Roos APWD, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 2008;178:553-61. (Pubitemid 351398768)
96. Villumsen TM, Janss L, Lund MS. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2009;126:3-13.
97. Bernardo R, Yu JM. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Science 2007;47:1082-90. (Pubitemid 47309157)
98. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 2009;182:343-53.
99. Zhong SQ, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink JL. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics 2009;182:355-64.