Dissimilarity kernels for paraphrase identification

Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, FLAIRS - 24

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 263-268

  Lintean, Mihai ^a   Rus, Vasile ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

10-FOLD CROSS-VALIDATION; DATA SETS; LEARNING METHODS; MICROSOFT RESEARCHES; NOVEL SOLUTIONS; PARAPHRASE CORPUS; TEXT FRAGMENTS; TEXT SIMILARITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION TREES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 80052426013     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Collins, M. 1996. A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies. In Proceedings of ACL, Santa Cruz.
2. Corley, C. and Mihalcea, R. 2005. Measuring the semantic similarity of texts. In Proc. of ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment.
3. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., and Magnini, B. 2005. The Pascal Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the Recognizing Textual Entaiment Challenge Workshop.
4. Das, D., and Smith, N.A. 2009. Paraphrase Identification as Probabilistic Quasi-Synchronous Recognition In Proc. of the Joint Conf. of ACL and NLP, Singapore, August 2009.
5. Dolan, W.B., and Brockett, C. 2005. Automatically constructing a corpus of sentential paraphrases. In Proc. of IWP.
6. Dumais, S. 1991. Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 23,229-236.
7. Fernando, S., and Stevenson, M. 2008. A Semantic Similarity Approach to Paraphrase Detection. In Proceedings of the Computational Linguistics UK (CLUK 2008).
8. Graesser, A.C., Olney, A., Haynes, B.C., and Chipman, P. 2005 AutoTutor: A cognitive system that simulates a tutor that facilitates learning through mixed-initiative dialogue. Cognitive Systems: Human Cognitive Models in Systems Design Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Ibrahim, A.; Katz, B.; and Lin, J. 2003. Extracting structural paraphrases from aligned monolingual corpora. In Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Paraphrasing (ACL2003).
10. Joachims, T. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning MIT Press.
11. Kate, R.J. 2008. A Dependency-based Word Subsequence Kernel. In Proceedings of EMNLP, 2008.
12. Lintean, M., and Rus, V. 2009. Paraphrase Identification Using Weighted Dependencies and Word Semantics. Proceedings of the FLAIRS-22. Sanibel Island, FL.
13. Lodhi, H., Saunders, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Cristianini, N., and Watkins, C. 2002. Text Classification using String Kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:419-444.
14. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., and Strapparava, C. 2006. Corpus-based and Knowledge-based Measures of Text Semantic Similarity. In Proceedings of AAAI-2006. Boston, July.
15. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., and Michelizzi, J. 2004. WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts. In Proceedings of AAAI-04. San Jose, CA.
16. Rus, V., Nan, X., Shiva, S.G., and Chen, Y. 2009. Clustering of Defect Reports Using Graph Partitioning Algorithms. In Proceedings of SEKE'2009. Boston, MA, July, p. 442-445.
17. Rus, V., Lintean, M., Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S. 2009. Assessing Student Paraphrases Using Lexical Semantics and Word Weighting In Proceedings of AlED. Brighton, UK.
18. Qiu, L., Kan, M. Y., and Chua, T. S. 2006. Paraphrase recognition via dissimilarity significance classification. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
19. Shawe-Taylor, J., and Cristianini, N. 2000. Support Vector Machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press.
20. Wan, S., Dras, M., Dale, M., and Paris, C. 2006. Using dependency-based features to take the para-farce out of paraphrase In Proceedings of ALTW.
21. Weeds, J., Weir, D., and Keller, B. 2005. The distributional similarity of sub-parses. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment. Ann Arbor, MI, June, ACL, p. 7-12.
22. Wu, D. 2005. Recognizing paraphrases and textual entailment using inversion transduction grammars. In Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment.
23. Zanzotto, F. M., Pannacchiotti, M., and Moschitti, A. 2009. A machine learning approach to textual entailnment recognition. Natural Language Engineering, 15(4):551-582.
24. Zhang, Y., and Patrick, J. 2005. Paraphrase identification by text canonicalization. In Proceedings of ALTW,160-166.