Subject objects

Feminist Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 119-145

  Suchman, Lucy ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feminist technoscience; human machine relations; nonhuman subjects; robot

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052422041     PISSN: 14647001     EISSN: 17412773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1464700111404205     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ahmed S. (1998) Differences that Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Alac M. (2009) Moving android: On social robots and body-in-interactions. Social Studies of Science 39: 491-528.
3. Alaimo S. and Hekman S. (2008) Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4. Aryananda L. (2005a) Socially situated learning for a humanoid robotic creature. Available at: http://publications.csail.mit.edu/abstracts/abstracts05/aryananda/aryananda.html#2.
5. Aryananda L. (2005b) Out in the world: What did the robot hear and see? Epigenetic Robotics. Available at: http://people.csail.mit.edu/lijin/publication.html.
6. Aryananda L. (2006) Attending to learn and learning to attend for a social robot. Submitted to Humanoid 2006: 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Available at: http://people.csail.mit.edu/lijin/hum.pdf.
7. Asdal K. (2008) Subjected to parliament: The laboratory of experimental medicine and the animal body. Social Studies of Science 38: 899-917.
8. Barad K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Bennett J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10. Birke L., Bryld M. and Lykke N. (2004) Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. Feminist Theory 5: 167-183.
11. Bloomfield B. and Vurdubakis T. (2002) The vision thing: Constructing technology and the future in management advice. In: Clark T and Fincham R (eds) Critical Consulting: New Perspectives in the Management Advice Industry. Oxford: Blackwell, 115-129.
12. Breazeal C. (1998) Early experiments using motivations to regulate human-robot interaction. Proceedings of 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium, Emotional and Intelligent: The Tangled Knot of Cognition. Orlando, FL: Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 31-36.
13. Breazeal C. (2000) Sociable machines: Expressive social exchange between humans and robots. Unpublished Sc.D., MIT.
14. Breazeal C. and Scassellati B. (1999) A context-dependent attention system for a social robot. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI99). Stockholm: Sweden, 1146-1151.
15. Breazeal C. and Velasquez J. (1998) Toward teaching a robot 'infant' using emotive communication acts. Proceedings of 1998 Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Workshop on Socially Situated Intelligence. Switzerland: Zurich, 25-40.
16. Brooks R. (2002) Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books.
17. Castañeda C. (2001) Robotic skin: The future of touch? In: Ahmed S and Stacey J (eds) Thinking Through the Skin. London: Routledge, 223-236.
18. Castañeda C. (2002) Figurations: Child, Bodies, Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Castañeda C. and Suchman L. (forthcoming) Robot visions. In: Gamari-Tabrizi S (ed.) NatureCultures: Thinking with Donna Haraway.
20. Currier D. (2003) Feminist technological futures: Deleuze and body/technology assemblages. Feminist Theory 4: 321-338.
21. Cussins C. (1998) Ontological choreography: Agency for women patients in an infertility clinic. In: Berg M and Mol A (eds) Differences in Medicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 166-201.
22. Daston L. (2000) The coming into being of scientific objects. In: Daston L (ed.) Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-14.
23. Davies G. (2010) Captivating behaviour: Mouse models, experimental genetics and reductionist returns in the neurosciences. The Sociological Review 58: 53-72.
24. Dror O. (1999) The scientific image of emotion: Experience and technologies of inscription. Configurations 7: 355-401.
25. Dror O. (2001) Counting the affects: Discoursing in numbers. Social Research 68: 357-378.
26. Edwards P. (1996) The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Fujimura J. (2005) Postgenomic futures: Translations across the machine-nature border in systems biology. New Genetics and Society 24(2): 195-225.
28. Giffney N. and Hird MJ (2008) Introduction. In: Giffney N and Hird MJ (eds) Queering the Non/Human. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1-16.
29. Grimes K. (2006) Future nature. Leonardo Electronic Almanac 14(7-8). Available at: http://leoalmanac.org/gallery/digiwild/future.htm.
30. Haraway D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
31. Haraway D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
32. Haraway D. (1997) Modest Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_Onco MouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
33. Haraway D. (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Hayles NK (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Hayles NK (2005) Computing the human. Theory, Culture & Society 22: 131-151.
36. Helmreich S. (1998) Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Hird M. (2009a) Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies 35: 329-346.
38. Hird M. (2009b) The Origins of Sociable Life: Evolution after Science Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
39. Hird M. (2010) Meeting with the microcosmos. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 36-39.
40. Kay L. (2000) Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
41. Keller EF (2007) Booting up baby. In: Riskin J (ed.) Genesis Redux. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 334-345.
42. Kember S. (2003) Cyberfeminism and Artificial Life. London: Routledge.
43. Latour B. (1986) Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society 6: 1-40.
44. Latour B. (1988) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Latour B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Law J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
47. Lorimer J. and Davies G. (2010) Interdisciplinary conversations on interspecies encounters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(1): 32-33.
48. Lynch M. (1988) Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practices in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science 18: 265-289.
49. Maes P. (1997) Modelling adaptive autonomous agents. In: Langton C (ed.) Artificial Life: An Overview. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Menzel P. and D'Aluisio F. (2000) Robo Sapiens. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Myers N. (2008) Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science 38(2): 163-199.
52. Neumark N. (2001) E/motional machines: Esprit de corps. In: Koivunen A and Passonen S (eds) Affective Encounters: Rethinking Embodiment in Feminist Media Studies, Media Studies, Series A, No. 49. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, School of Art, Literature and Music, 162-170.
53. Noble D. (1984) Forces of Production. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Orr J. (2006) Panic Diaries: A Genealogy of Panic Disorder. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
55. Risan L. (1997) Artificial life: A technoscience leaving modernity? An anthropology of subjects and objects. Available at: http://anthrobase.com/Txt/R/Risan_L_05.htm.
56. Robins B. and Dautenhahn K. (2006) The role of the experimenter in HRI research: A case study evaluation of children with autism interacting with a robotic toy. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN06), 6-8 September. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK: IEEE Press, 646-651.
57. Robins B., Dautenhahn K. and Dickerson P. (2009) From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI 09. Cancun, Mexico: IEEE Computer Society Press, 205-211.
58. Schegloff E. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement. In: Tannen D (ed.) Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics: Analyzing Discourse and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 71-93.
59. Shapin S. and Schaffer S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Smith W. (2009) Theatre of use: A frame analysis of IT demonstrations. Social Studies of Science 39(3): 449-480.
61. Suchman L. (2007a) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Suchman L. (2007b) Feminist STS and the sciences of the artificial. In: Hackett E, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajcman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 139-163.
63. Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 433-460.
64. valentine k (2010) A consideration of medicalisation: Choice, engagement and other responsibilities of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Social Science & Medicine 71: 950-957.
65. Wei SX (2002) Resistance is fertile: Gesture and agency in the field of responsive media. Configurations 10: 439-472.
66. Wilson E. (2002) Imaginable computers: Affects and intelligence in Alan Turing. In: Tofts D, Jonson A and Callaro A (eds) Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 38-51.