A weighted multi-factor algorithm for microblog search

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6890 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 153-161

  Zhao, Lulin ^a   Zeng, Yi ^a   Zhong, Ning ^a,b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b MAEBASHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM SELECTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA SETS; MICRO-BLOG; MULTI-FACTOR; RANKING ALGORITHM; RANKING MEASURES; RANKING STRATEGY; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL INFORMATION; SOCIAL NETWORKS; USER SELECTION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 80052421547     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23620-4_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Microblogging, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/micro-blogging
2. Milstein, S., Chowdhury, A., Hochmuth, G., Lorica, B., Magoulas, R.: Twitter and the micro-messaging revolution: communication, connections, and immediacy-140 characters at a time. O'Reilly, Sebastopol (2008)
3. Cheng, A., Evans, M.: Inside Twitter: An in-depth look inside the Twitter world, http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/
4. Efron, M.: Information search and retrieval in microblogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(6), 996-1008 (2011)
5. Ye, S., Wu, S.F.: Measuring message propagation and social influence on twitter.com. In: Bolc, L., Makowski, M., Wierzbicki, A. (eds.) SocInfo 2010. LNCS, vol. 6430, pp. 216-231. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
6. Lampos, V., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N.: Flu Detector - Tracking Epidemics on Twitter. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6323, pp. 599-602. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
7. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 851-860 (2010)
8. David, K., Jon, K., Eva, T.: Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, pp. 1127-1138 (2005)
9. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web, Technical Report. Stanford InfoLab (1999)
10. Daniel, G.A.: Nepotistic relationships in Twitter and their impact on rank prestige algorithms. CoRR abs/1004.0816 (2010)
11. Twithority, http://twithority.com/
12. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
13. Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 668-677 (1999)
14. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 10-17 (2010)
15. Weng, J., Lim, E., Jiang, J., He, Q.: TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential Twitterers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 261-270 (2010)
16. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Sue, M.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591-600 (2010)
17. User Preference Judgment Dataset, http://faculty.washington.edu/ankurt/ TABS/ProjectHome.html
18. Hacker, S., Ahn, L.V.: Matchin: Eliciting user preferences with an online game. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1207-1216 (2009)
19. Sarma, A.D., Gollapudi, S.: Ranking mechanisms in Twitter-like forums. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 21-30 (2010)
20. David, H.: The Method of Paired Comparisons. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)
21. Nagmoti, R., Teredesai, A., De Cock, M.: Ranking approaches for microblog search. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 153-157 (2010)
22. Twitter Authority Based Search (TABS), http://cssgate.insttech. washington.edu:8184/TABS/
23. Hong, L., Davison, B.D.: Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pp. 80-88 (2010)
24. Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1/2), 81-93 (1938)
25. Michelson, M., Macskassy, S.A.: Discovering users' topics of interest on Twitter: a first look. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, pp. 73-80 (2010)
26. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993-1022 (2003)
27. Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M.: Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 5228-5235 (2004)
28. Gao, J., An, B., Song, A., Wang, X.: A new topic influence model research in online community. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, pp. 466-469 (2007)
29. Ramage, D., Dumais, S., Liebling, D.: Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 1-8 (2010)
30. Spammers Shorten Their URLs, http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/ spammers-shorten-their-urls/