Eco-routing: Comparing the fuel consumption of different routes between an origin and destination using field test speed profiles and synthetic speed profiles

2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, FISTS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 32-39

  Minett, Claire F ^a   Salomons, A Maria ^a   Daamen, Winnie ^a   Van Arem, Bart ^a   Kuijpers, Sjon ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b NAVTEQ BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON FOOTPRINT; DIGITAL MAP; ENERGY EFFICIENT; FIELD TEST; FIELD TEST DATA; FUEL COST; LINK SPEED; LOCATION BASED; ORIGIN AND DESTINATIONS; RESEARCH TOOLS; SPEED PROFILE; TWO-POINT; VEHICLE SPEED;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUELS; STEEL METALLURGY; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

SPEED;

EID: 80052406236     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FISTS.2011.5973621     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. IPCC, Summary for Policymakers, in Climat e Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-12.
2. World Bank, The Little Green Data Book 2009, ISBN: 978-0-8213- 7849-6, p12.
3. OECD, Air in Environmental Data Compendium 2006/2007, Environmental Performance and Information Division OECD, Environment Directorate, p41.
4. OECD, Transport in Environmental Data Compendium 2006/2007, Environmental Performance and Information Division OECD, Environment Directorate, p22.
5. European Parliament, Texts adopted. Texts adopted. Wednesday, 16 November 2005 - Strasbourg. Beating global climate change. European Parliament resolution on "Winning the Battle Against Global Climate Change" (2005/2049(INI)).
6. Barth M, K Boriboonsomsin and A Vu, Environmentally friendly navigation. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2007.
7. NAVTEQ, Map-Enhanced Green Driving Assistant, NAVTEQ White Paper [unpublished], 2009.
8. Lee W-C, B-W Cheng, Effects of using a portable navigation system and paper map in real driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40 (2008) pp303-308.
9. Ahn K and H Rakha, The effects of route choice decisions on vehicle energy consumption and emissions. In Transportation Research Part D, 13 (2008) pp.151-167 [online]. [Accessed December 2009] Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/tdr
10. Uang S-T and S-L Hwang, Effects on driving behavior of congestion information and of scale of in-vehicle navigation systems in Transportation Research Part C, 11 (2003) pp.423-438.
11. Ericsson E, H Larsson and K Brundell-Freij, Optimizing route choice for lowest fuel consumption - potential effects of a new driver support tool. In Transportation Research Part C, 14 (2006) pp.369-383.
12. Calkins A, Green Routing, NAVTEQ Report [unpublished] 2008.
13. Cerbe TM, A. Kuhnert and S. Strube, Fuel saving potential of car navigation systems, ITS World Congress CD-ROM, Stockholm 2009 (4093).
14. Park S. and H. Rakha, Energy and Environmental Impacts of Roadway Grades, in TRB 2005 Annual Meeting (06-0628).
15. Wevers K, Map integration of model data for optimising HGV routing, ITS World Congress CD-ROM, Stockholm 2009 (3576).
16. Dijkstra E.W., A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with graphs. In Numerische Mathematik 1 (1959) pp.269-271.
17. 2 Emission Model Based on Instantaneous Vehicle Power. Paper submitted for peer review at the 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, [unpublished] 2010.
18. Google Maps, online at www.maps.google.nl accessed June 2010.
19. ANWB route finder, online at www.anwb.nl accessed June 2010
20. Microsoft MapPoint, details online at http://www.microsoft.com/mappoint, accessed January 2011
21. ADAS-RP 2009 User's Manual, Version 2.9.1, August 2009, NAVTEQ.