In-shoe plantar pressure measurements for patients with knee osteoarthritis: Reliability and effects of lateral heel wedges

Gait and Posture

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 391-396

  Leitch, Kristyn M ^a   Birmingham, Trevor B ^a   Jones, Ian C ^a   Giffin, J Robert ^a   Jenkyn, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Centre of pressure; Knee adduction moment; Lateral heel pressure; Minimum detectable change; Orthotics

Indexed keywords

ADDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTER OF PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GAIT; HEEL; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LATERAL HEEL PRESSURE; MALE; PLANTAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOES; WALKING;

EID: 80052399457     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Erhart J.C., Mündermann A., Mündermann L., Andriacchi T.P. Predicting changes in knee adduction moment due to load-altering interventions from pressure distribution at the foot in healthy subjects. J Biomech 2008, 41:2989-2994.
2. Nigg B.M., Stergiou P., Cole G., Stefanyshyn D., Mündermann A., Humble N. Effect of shoe inserts on kinematics, center of pressure, and leg joint moments during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:314-319.
3. Van Gheluwe B., Dananberg H.J. Changes in plantar foot pressure with in-shoe varus or valgus wedging. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2004, 94(1):1-11.
4. Kernozek T.W., LaMott E.E., Dancisak M.J. Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int 1996, 17(4):204-209.
5. Mueller M.J., Strube M.J. Generalizability of in-shoe peak pressure measures using the F-scan system. Clin Biomech 1996, 11(3):159-164.
6. Boyd L.A., Bontrager E.L., Mulroy S.J., Perry P.T., Perry J. The reliability and validity of the novel Pedar system of in-shoe pressure measurement during free ambulation. Gait Posture 1997, 5(2):165.
7. Murphy D.F., Beynnon B.D., Michelson J.D., Vacek P.M. Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 2005, 26(2):171-179.
8. Hurkmans H.L.P., Bussmann J.B.J., Selles R.W., Horemans H.L.D., Benda E., Stam H.J., et al. Validity of the Pedar mobile system for vertical force measurement during a seven-hour period. J Biomech 2006, 39:110-118.
9. Putti A.B., Arnold G.P., Cochrane L., Abboud R.J. The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values. Gait Posture 2007, 25:401-405.
10. Vidmar G., Novak P. Reliability of in-shoe plantar pressure measurement in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2009, 32(1):36-40.
11. Ramanathan A.K., MCh P.K., Arnold G.P., Wang W.W., Abboud R.J. Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system. Foot Ankle Surg 2010, 16:70-73.
12. Low D.C., Dixon S.J. Footscan pressure insoles: accuracy and reliability of force and pressure measurements in running. Gait Posture 2010, 32(4):664-666.
13. Badley E.M. Arthritis in Canada: what do we know and what should we know?. J Rheumatol 2005, 32(Suppl. 72):32-41.
14. Cooper C., Snow S., McAlindon T.E., Kellingray S., Stuart B., Coggon D., et al. Risk factors for the incidence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000, 43(5):995-1000.
15. Lawrence R.C., Felson D.T., Helmick C.G., Arnold L.M., Choi H., Deyo R.A., et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 58(1):26-35.
16. Gélis A., Coudeyre E., Hurdy C., Pelissier J., Revel M., Rannou F. Is there an evidence-based efficacy for the use of foot orthotics in knee and hip osteoarthritis? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Joint Bone Spine 2008, 75:714-720.
17. Zhang W., Moskowitz R.W., Nuki G., Abramson S., Altman R.D., Arden N., et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:137-162.
18. Kakihana W., Akai M., Nakazawa K., Takashima T., Naito K., Torii S. Effects of laterally wedged insoles on knee subtalar joint moments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:1456-1471.
19. Reilly K.A., Barker K.L., Shamely D. A systematic review of lateral wedge orthotics-how useful are they in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis?. Knee 2006, 13:177-183.
20. Richmond J., Hunter D., Irrgang J., Jones M.H., Levy B., Marx R., et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (nonarthroplasty). American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009, 17:591-600.
21. Maly M.R., Culham E.G., Costigan P.A. Static and dynamic biomechanics of foot orthoses in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech 2002, 17:603-610.
22. Woodburn J., Helliwell P.S. Observations on the F-Scan in-shoe pressure measuring system. Clin Biomech 1996, 11(5):301-304.
23. Luo Z.P., Berglund L.J., An K.N. Validation of F-Scan pressure sensor system: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998, 35:186.
24. Randolph A.L., Nelson M., deAraujo M.P., Perez-Millan R., Wynn T.T. Use of computerized insole sensor system to evaluate the efficacy of a modified ankle-foot orthoses for redistributing heel pressure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999, 80:573-578.
25. Polliack A.A., Sieh R.C., Craig D.D., Landsberger S., McNeil D.R., Ayyappa E. Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000, 24:63.
26. Hsaio H., Guan J., Weatherly M. Accuracy and precision of two in-shoe pressure measurement systems. Ergonomics 2002, 45:537.
27. Hurkmans H.L.P., Bussmann J.B.J., Benda E., Verhaar J.A.N., Stam H.J. Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar mobile system in long-term force measurement. Gait Posture 2006, 23:118-125.
28. Mittlemeier T.W.F., Morlock M. Pressure distribution measurements in gait analysis: dependency in measurement frequency. Abstract Presented at: 39th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society 1993.
29. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., Wootten M.E. Measurement of lower extremity during level walking. J Orthop Res 1990, 8:383-392.
30. Barnett S., Cunningham J.L., West S. A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech 2000, 15:781-785.
31. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, i:307-310.
32. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:420-428.
33. Stratford P.W., Goldsmith C.H. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 1997, 77:745-755.
34. Fleiss J.L. The measurement of interrater agreement in statistical methods for rates and proportions 1981, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
35. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health measurements: a practical guide to their development and use 1995, Oxford University Press, New York. second ed.
36. Spooner S.K., Smith D.K., Kirby K.A. In-shoe pressure measurement and foot orthosis research. JAPMA 2010, 100(6):518-528.
37. Rosenbaum D., Becker H.P. Plantar pressure distribution measurements. Technical background and clinical applications. Foot Ankle 1997, 3:1-14.
38. Segal A., Rohr E., Orendurff M., Shofer J., O'Brien M., Sangeorzan B. The effect of walking speed on peak plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 2004, 25(12):926-933.