Influence of an unexpected perturbation on adaptive gait behavior

Gait and Posture

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 439-441

  Rhea, Christopher K ^a   Rietdyk, Shirley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive gait; Biomechanics; Gait; Perturbation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE GAIT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOT; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIMB; LOCOMOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; SENSORY ANALYSIS; TOE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK; GAIT; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 80052394224     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sattin R.W. Falls among older persons: a public health perspective. Annu Rev Publ Health 1992, 13:489-508.
2. Howland J., Lachman M.E., Peterson E.W., Cote J., Kasten L., Jette A. Covariate of fear of falling and associated activity curtailment. The Gerontologist 1998, 38(5):549-555.
3. Chen H.C., Ashton-Miller J.A., Alexander N.B., Schultz A.B. Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 1991, 46:M196-M203.
4. Patla A.E., Rietdyk S. Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacle during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait Posture 1993, 1:45-60.
5. Rhea C.K., Rietdyk S. Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neurosci Lett 2007, 418:60-65.
6. Mohagheghi A.A., Moraes R., Patla A.E. The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 2004, 155:459-468.
7. Patla A.E., Rietdyk S., Martin C., Prentice S. Locomotor patterns of the leading and trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. J Motor Behav 1996, 28(1):35-47.
8. Niang A.E.S., McFadyen B.J. Adaptation in the bilateral mechanical power patterns during obstacle avoidance reveal distinct control strategies for limb elevation versus limb progression. Motor Control 2004, 8:160-173.
9. Yang J.F., Lam T., Pang M.Y.C., Lamont E., Musselman K., Seinen E. Infant stepping: a window to the behavior of the human pattern generator for walking. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004, 82:662-674.
10. Rhea C.K., Rietdyk S. Increased exposure to visual interference altered gait kinematics while avoiding an obstacle 2005, North American Society for Psychology in Sport and Physical Activity, St. Pete's Beach, FL.
11. Rhea C.K., Rietdyk S. Gait adaptation: lead toe clearance continually decreased over multiple exposures with and without on-line visual information. XXth congress of the international society of biomechanics 2005.
12. Patla A.E., Greig M. Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett 2006, 397:110-114.
13. Chou L.S., Draganich L.F. Increasing obstacle height and decreasing toe-obstacle distance affect the joint moments of the stance limb differently when stepping over an obstacle. Gait Posture 1998, 8(3):186-204.
14. Rietdyk S., Rhea C.K. Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment. Exp Brain Res 2006, 169:272-278.
15. Owings T.M., Pavol M.J., Grabiner M.D. Mechanisms of failed recovery following postural perturbations on a motorized treadmill mimic those associated with an actual forward trip. Clin Biomech 2001, 16:813-819.
16. Bieryla K.A., Madigan M.L., Nussbaum M.A. Practicing recovery from a simulated trip improves recovery kinematics after an actual trip. Gait Posture 2007, 26:208-213.