Emergence of long-range correlations and rigidity at the dynamic glass transition

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 107, Issue 10, 2011, Pages

  Szamel, Grzegorz ^a   Flenner, Elijah ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY CORRELATION; DYNAMIC GLASS TRANSITION; GOLDSTONE MODES; LONG RANGE CORRELATIONS; MEAN-FIELD; MICROSCOPIC LEVELS; TRANSLATIONAL SYMMETRY;

GLASS;

GLASS TRANSITION;

EID: 80052347386     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.105505     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. P.W. Anderson, Science 177, 393 (1972). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.177.4047.393
2. D. Forster, Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions (Benjamin, Reading, 1975).
3. R.F. Kayser, Jr., J.B. Hubbard, and H.J. Raveche, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 24, 51 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.51
4. H. Wagner, Z. Phys. 195, 273 (1966). ZEPYAA 1434-6001 10.1007/BF01325630
5. F. Bavaud, Ph. Choquard, and J.-R. Fontaine, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 621 (1986). JSTPSB 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01127732
6. G. Szamel and M.H. Ernst, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 48, 112 (1993) (these authors were unaware of Ref. 4). 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.112
7. The term "dynamic glass transition" implies a two-transition scenario, with a higher-temperature transition resulting in a metastable glassy state and a lower-temperature thermodynamic glass transition. Such a scenario was first found in the analysis of certain mean-field spin models by Kirkpatrick, Thirumalai, and Wolynes [see, e.g. T.R. Kirkpatrick and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 36, 5388 (1987) 10.1103/PhysRevB.36. 5388
8. S. Franz and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2486 (1997). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2486
9. M. Cardenas, S. Franz, and G. Parisi, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 1726 (1999). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.478028
10. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 747 (1999). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.747
11. G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754 (1979). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754
12. C. Walz and M. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 81, 134110 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134110
13. R. Mari, F. Krzakala, and J. Kurchan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 025701 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.025701
14. A. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 248305 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.248305
15. D.G. Triezenberg and R. Zwanzig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1183 (1972). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1183
16. R. Lovett, P.W. DeHaven, J.J. Vieceli, Jr., and F.P. Buff, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1880 (1973). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1679447
17. G. Szamel, Europhys. Lett. 91, 56004 (2010). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/91/56004
18. W. Götze, Complex Dynamics of Glass-Forming Liquids: A Mode-Coupling Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
19. H. Yoshino and M. Mezard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 015504 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.015504
20. J.-L. Barrat, Europhys. Lett. 7, 707 (1988) EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/7/8/007
21. F. Weysser (private communication)].
22. Experimental results are similarly ambiguous; a recent study M. Siebenbürger, J. Rheol. 53, 707 (2009) JORHD2 0148-6055 10.1122/1.3093088
23. A.J. Masters, Mol. Phys. 99, 907 (2001). MOPHAM 0026-8976 10.1080/00268970010028827 (Pubitemid 35227717)