Connecting worlds

Management Learning

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 371-377

  Swart, Juani ^a   van den Hooff, Bart ^b   van Baalen, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

boundaries; knowledge creation and exchange; learning; networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052339090     PISSN: 13505076     EISSN: 14617307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350507611408218     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Afuah A. (2001) Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1211-1228.
2. Easterby-Smith M., Graça M., Antonacopoulou E. and Ferdinand J. (2008) Absorptive capacity: A process perspective. Management Learning 39(5): 483-501.
3. Engberg C., Lindqvist L. and Tell F. (2006) Exploring the dynamics of knowledge integration: Acting and interacting in project teams. Management Learning 37(2): 143-165.
4. Foucault M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
5. Gherhardi S., Nicolini D. and Odella F. (1998) Towards a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning 29(3): 273-297.
6. Granovetter M. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-1380.
7. Heizmann H. (2011) The socio-cultural and political dynamism of knowledge sharing in practice: A discourse analytic approach. Management Learning 42(4): 379-393.
8. Holmqvist M. (2009) Complicating the organization: A new perspective for the learning organization. Management Learning 40(3): 275-287.
9. Jarvenpaa SL and Majchrzak A. (2008) Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science 19(2): 260-276.
10. Jones O. (2006) Developing absorptive capacity in mature organizations. Management Learning 37(3): 355-376.
11. Knoppen D., Sáenz MJ and Johnston D. (2011) Innovations in a Relational Context: Mechanisms to connect Learning Processes of Absorptive Capacity. Management Learning 42(4): 419-438.
12. Kogut B. and Zander U. (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7(5): 502-518.
13. Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K. and Sparks J. (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 285-305.
14. Macpherson A. and Clark B. (2009) Islands of practice: Conflict and a lack of 'community' in situated learning. Management Learning 40(5): 551-568.
15. Malhotra N. and Morris T. (2009) Heterogeneity in professional service firms. Journal of Management Studies 46(6): 895-922.
16. Newell S., Bresnen M., Edelman L., Scarbrough H. and Swan J. (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects: Limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning 37(2): 167-185.
17. Powell J. and Swart J. (2010) The elephant in the room: The implications of axiomatic approaches to knowledge scaling upon network learning and organizational knowledge. European Journal of International Management 4(6): 621-643.
18. Rajala R., Kauppila OP and Jyrämä A. (2011) Knowledge Sharing Through Virtual Teams Across Borders and Boundaries. Management Learning 42(4): 395-418.
19. Roberts J. (2006) Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 623-639.
20. Swan J., Scarbrough H. and Newell S. (2010) Why don't (or do) organizations learn from projects? Management Learning 41(3): 325-344.
21. Swart J. and Kinnie N. (2007) Simultaneity of learning orientations in a marketing agency. Management Learning 38(3): 337-357.