The impact of pre-admission morbidity level on 3-year mortality after intensive care: A Danish cohort study

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 962-970

  Christiansen, C F ^a   Christensen, S ^a   Johansen, M B ^a   Larsen, K M ^a   TOnnesen E ^a   SOrensen H T ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DENMARK; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PREADMISSION MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COMORBIDITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DENMARK; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATIENT ADMISSION; POPULATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052296296     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02480.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kvale R, Flaatten H., Changes in intensive care from 1987 to 1997-has outcome improved? A single centre study. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1110-16. (Pubitemid 34985235)
2. Flaatten H., Intensive care in the very old: are we prepared? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 519-21.
3. Laake JH, Dybwik K, Flaatten HK, Fonneland IL, Kvale R, Strand K., Impact of the post-World War II generation on intensive care needs in Norway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 479-84.
4. Williams TA, Ho KM, Dobb GJ, Finn JC, Knuiman MW, Webb SA., Changes in case-mix and outcomes of critically ill patients in an Australian tertiary intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 703-09.
5. Williams TA, Dobb GJ, Finn JC, Knuiman M, Lee KY, Geelhoed E, Webb SA., Data linkage enables evaluation of long-term survival after intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 307-15. (Pubitemid 43971037)
6. Ho KM, Knuiman M, Finn J, Webb SA., Estimating long-term survival of critically ill patients: the PREDICT model. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e3226.
7. Williams TA, Dobb GJ, Finn JC, Knuiman M, Geelhoed E, Lee KY, Webb SA., Determinants of long-term survival after intensive care. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 1523-30. (Pubitemid 351620661)
8. Niskanen M, Kari A, Halonen P., Five-year survival after intensive care-comparison of 12,180 patients with the general population. Finnish ICU Study Group. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 1962-67. (Pubitemid 26418887)
9. Flaatten H, Kvale R., Survival and quality of life 12 years after ICU. A comparison with the general Norwegian population. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 1005-11. (Pubitemid 32662482)
10. Zaren B, Bergstrom R., Survival compared to the general population and changes in health status among intensive care patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33: 6-12. (Pubitemid 19041569)
11. Dragsted L., Outcome from intensive care. A five year study of 1,308 patients. Dan Med Bull 1991; 38: 365-74.
12. Wright JC, Plenderleith L, Ridley SA., Long-term survival following intensive care: subgroup analysis and comparison with the general population. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 637-42.
13. Wunsch H, Guerra C, Barnato AE, Angus DC, Li G, Linde-Zwirble WT., Three-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care. JAMA 2010; 303: 849-56.
14. Frank L., Epidemiology. When an entire country is a cohort. Science 2000; 287: 2398-9. (Pubitemid 30185417)
15. Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH., The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 263-68. (Pubitemid 29299976)
16. Nickelsen TN., [Data validity and coverage in the Danish National Health Registry A literature review]. Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 164: 33-37. (Pubitemid 34065463)
17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR., A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-78.
18. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA., Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 613-19.
19. Needham DM, Scales DC, Laupacis A, Pronovost PJ., A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research. J Crit Care 2005; 20: 12-29.
20. Rothman KJ., Measuring interactions. In: Epidemiology-an introduction., Rothman KJ., ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 2002: 168-80.
21. Thygesen SK, Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Lash TL, Sorensen HT., The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson Comorbidity Index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 83.
22. Hsu CY, Ordonez JD, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Go AS., The risk of acute renal failure in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2008; 74: 101-07. (Pubitemid 351841887)
23. Curtis JR, Vincent JL., Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet 2010; 376: 1347-53.