Assessment of mitral valve stenosis by helical MDCT: Comparison with transthoracic doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 197, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 614-622

  Lembcke, Alexander ^a   Durmus, Tahir ^a   Westermann, Yvonne ^a   Geigenmueller, Anja ^a   Claus, Benjamin ^a   Butler, Craig ^b   Thiele, Holger ^c  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac catheterization; CT; Echocardiography; Mitral valve; Stenosis

Indexed keywords

ATENOLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; IOPAMIDOL; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 80052290468     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5132     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Rahimtoola SH, Durairaj A, Mehra A, Nuno I. Current evaluation and management of patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation 2002; 106:1183-1188 (Pubitemid 34988632)
2. Hugenholtz PG, Ryan TJ, Stein SW, Abelmann WH. The spectrum of pure mitral stenosis: hemodynamic studies in relation to clinical disability. Am J Cardiol 1962; 10:773-784
3. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Laissy JP, et al. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:411-413
4. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:223-229 (Pubitemid 38391787)
5. Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:400-409 (Pubitemid 44284202)
6. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15:167-184
7. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:1-23
8. Cohen M, Gorlin R. Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area. Am Heart J 1972; 84:839-842
9. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006; 114:e84-e231
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
11. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2007; 244:745-754 (Pubitemid 47292085)
12. Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC, et al. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 2009; 44:7-14
13. Lembcke A, Thiele H, Lachnitt A, et al. Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 719-728
14. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005; 40:631-636 (Pubitemid 41384053)
15. Djavidani B, Debl K, Lenhart M, et al. Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:2048-2053 (Pubitemid 40814130)
16. Rodrigo FA. Estimation of valve area and valvular resistance; a critical study of the physical basis of the methods employed. Am Heart J 1953; 45:1-12
17. Cannon SR, Richards KL, Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 1985; 71:1170-1178 (Pubitemid 15036364)
18. Segal J, Lerner DJ, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Alderman EA, Popp RL. When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula? Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9:1294-1305 (Pubitemid 17083528)
19. Carabello BA. Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10:912-919 (Pubitemid 17163118)
20. Dangas G, Gorlin R. Changing concepts in the determination of valvular stenosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1997; 40:55-64 (Pubitemid 27319121)
21. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988; 77:78-85 (Pubitemid 18031003)
22. Moro E, Nicolosi GL, Zanuttini D, Cervesato E, Roelandt J. Influence of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of the pressure half-time and derived mitral-valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur Heart J 1988; 9:1010-1017
23. Karp K, Teien D, Bjerle P, Eriksson P. Reassessment of valve area determinations in mitral stenosis by the pressure half-time method: impact of left ventricular stiffness and peak diastolic pressure difference. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:594-599 (Pubitemid 19073926)
24. Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Gillam L, Liu CM, Abascal VM, Thomas JD. Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:396-404 (Pubitemid 20245859)
25. Thomas JD, Wilkins GT, Choong CY, et al. Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy: dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance. Circulation 1988; 78:980-993
26. Grayburn PA, Smith MD, Gurley JC, Booth DC, DeMaria AN. Effect of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of mitral valve orifice area by Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60:322-326 (Pubitemid 17133061)
27. Messika-Zeitoun D, Meizels A, Cachier A, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of the mitral valve area before and after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy: the pressure half-time method revisited. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18:1409-1414 (Pubitemid 41821190)
28. Rifkin RD, Harper K, Tighe D. Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method with pressure half-time and planimetry in evaluation of mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26:458-465
29. Messika-Zeitoun D, Cachier A, Brochet E, Cormier B, Iung B, Vahanian A. Evaluation of mitral valve area by the proximal isovelocity surface area method in mitral stenosis: could it be simplified? Eur J Echocardiogr 2007; 8:116-121 (Pubitemid 46112122)
30. Geibel A, Gornandt L, Kasper W, Bubenheimer P. Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic quantification of aortic and mitral valve stenoses: comparison between two echocardiography centers. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:1013-1021
31. Martin RP, Rakowski H, Kleiman JH, Beaver W, London E, Popp RL. Reliability and reproducibility of two dimensional echocardiograph measurement of the stenotic mitral valve orifice area. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43:560-568 (Pubitemid 9136167)
32. Binder TM, Rosenhek R, Porenta G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:1355-1361
33. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97:1506-1510
34. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1658-1665 (Pubitemid 44528167)
35. Faletra F, Pezzano A Jr, Fusco R, et al. Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1190-1197 (Pubitemid 26376994)