Humic substance charge determination by titration with a flexible cationic polyelectrolyte

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volumn 75, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 5749-5761

  Tan, Wen Feng ^a,b   Norde, Willem ^a,c   Koopal, Luuk K ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID; CATION; CHEMICAL METHOD; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD; ELECTROLYTE; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; PH; STOICHIOMETRY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 80052287444     PISSN: 00167037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aiken G.R., Thurman E.M., Malcolm R.L., Walton H. Comparison of macroporous resins for the preconcentration of fulvic acid from aqueous solution. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51:1799-1803.
2. Avena M.J., Koopal L.K., van Riemsdijk W.H. Proton binding to humic acids: electrostatic and intrinsic interactions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1999, 217:37-48.
3. Avena M.J., Wilkinson K.J. Disaggregation kinetics of a peat humic acid: mechanism and pH effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:5100-5105.
4. Barron W., Murray B.S., Scales P.J., Healy T.W., Dixon D.R., Pascoe M. The streaming current detector: a comparison with conventional electrokinetic techniques. Colloids Surf. A 1994, 88:129-139.
5. Bolto B., Abbt-Braun G., Dixon D., Eldridge R., Frimmel F., Hesse S., King S., Toifl M. Experimental evaluation of cationic polyelectrolytes for removing natural organic matter from water. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40:71-79.
6. Bratskaya S., Gofikov A., Lutsenko T., Nesterova O., Dudarchik V. Charge characteristics of humic and fulvic acids: comparative analysis by colloid titration and potentiometric titration with continuous pK-distribution function model. Chemosphere 2008, 73:557-563.
7. Brigante M., Zanini G., Avena M. On the dissolution kinetics of humic acid particles - Effects of pH, temperature and Ca2+ concentration. Colloids Surf. A 2007, 294:64-70.
8. Delgado A.V., Gonzalez-Caballero F., Hunter R.J., Koopal L.K., Lyklema J. Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2007, 309:194-224.
9. Dentel S.K., Thomas A.V., Kingery K.M. Evaluation of the streaming current detector: 1. Use in jar tests. Water Res. 1989, 23:413-421.
10. Duval J.F.L., Wilkinson K.J., van Leeuwen H.L., Buffle J. Humic substances are soft and permeable: evidence from their electrophoretic mobilities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:6435-6445.
11. Filius J.D., Lumsdon D.G., Meeussen G.C.L., Hiemstra T., van Riemsdijk W.H. Adsorption of fulvic acid on goethite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64:51-60.
12. Hankins N.P., Lu N., Hilal N. Enhanced removal of heavy metal ions bound to humic acid by polyelectrolyte flocculation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:48-56.
13. Ishiguro M., Tan W.F., Koopal L.K. Binding of cationic surfactants to humic substances. Colloids Surf. A 2007, 306:29-39.
14. Kam S.K., Gregory J. Charge determination of synthetic cationic polyelectrolytes by colloid titration. Colloids Surf. A 1999, 159:165-179.
15. Kam S.K., Gregory J. The interaction of humic substances with cationic polyelectrolytes. Water Res. 2001, 35:3557-3566.
16. Koopal L.K., Goloub T.P., Davis T.A. Binding of ionic surfactants to purified humic acid. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2004, 275:360-367.
17. Koopal L.K., Saito T., Pinheiro J.P., van Riemsdijk W.H. Ion binding to natural organic matter: general considerations and the NICA-Donnan model. Colloids Surf. A 2005, 265:40-54.
18. Li Y., Mattison K.W., Dubin P.L., Havel H.A., Edwards S.L. Light scattering studies of the binding of Bovine Serum Albumin to a cationic polyelectrolyte. Biopolymers 1996, 38:527-533.
19. Merdy P., Huclier S., Koopal L.K. Modeling metal-particle interactions with an emphasis on natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:7459-7466.
20. Milne C.J., Kinniburgh D.G., van Riemsdijk W.H., Tipping E. Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for metal-ion binding by humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:958-971.
21. Milne C.J., Kinniburgh D.G., de Wit J.C.M., van Riemsdijk W.H., Koopal L.K. Analysis of proton binding by a peat humic acid using a simple electrostatic model. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59:1101-1112.
22. Müller H.M. Zetapotential in der laborpraxis 1996, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, mbH, Sturtgart, Germany.
23. Pelton R., Cabane B., Cui Y., Ketelson H. Shape of polyelectrolyte titration curves. 1. Well-behaved strong polyelectrolytes. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:8114-8117.
24. Ritchie J.D., Perdue E.M. Proton-binding study of standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids, and natural organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67:85-96.
25. Saito T., Koopal L.K., van Riemsdijk W.H., Nagasaki S., Tanaka S. Adsorption of humic acid on goethite: isotherms, charge adjustments, and potential profiles. Langmuir 2004, 20:689-700.
26. Sutton R., Sposito G. Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:9009-9015.
27. Tan W.F., Koopal L.K., Weng L.P., van Riemsdijk W.H., Norde W. Humic acid protein complexation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2008, 72:2090-2099.
28. Tan W.F., Koopal L.K., Norde W. Interaction between humic acid and lysozyme, studied by dynamic light scattering and isothermal titration calorimetry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:591-596.
29. Terayama H. Method of colloid titration (a new titration between polymer ions). J. Polym. Sci. 1952, 8:243-253.
30. Traina S.J., Mcavoy D.C., Versteeg D.J. Association of linear alkylbenzenesulfonates with dissolved humic substances and its effect on bioavailability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30:1300-1309.
31. Vermeer A.W.P., van Riemsdijk W.H., Koopal L.K. Adsorption of humic acid to mineral particles: 1. Specific and electrostatic interactions. Langmuir 1998, 14:2810-2819.
32. Vermeer A.W.P., Koopal L.K. Adsorption of humic acids to mineral particles. 2. Polydispersity effects with polyelectrolyte adsorption. Langmuir 1998, 14:4210-4216.
33. Walker C.A., Kirby J.T., Dentel S.K. The streaming current detector: quantitative model. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1996, 182:71-81.
34. Wang Z.D., Pant B.C., Langford C.H. Spectroscopic and structural characterization of a Laurentian fulvic acid: notes on the origin of the color. Anal. Chim. Acta 1990, 232:43-49.
35. Watanabe A., Itoh K., Arai S., Kuwatsuka S. Comparison of composition of humic and fulvic acids prepared by the IHSS method and NAGOYA method. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 1994, 40:601-608.
36. Weis M., Frimmel F.H. Electrochemical determination of the anionic charge of aquatic fulvic acids. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1989, 335:927-930.
37. Weng L.P., van Riemsdijk W.H., Hiemstra T. Adsorption free energy of variable-charge nanoparticles to a charged surface in relation to the change of the average chemical state of the particles. Langmuir 2006, 22:389-397.
38. Weng L.P., van Riemsdijk W.H., Koopal L.K., Hiemstra T. Ligand and charge distribution (LCD) model for the description of fulvic acid adsorption to goethite. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2006, 302:442-457.
39. Weng L.P., Koopal L.K., Hiemstra T., Meeussen G.C.L., van Riemsdijk W.H. Interactions of calcium and fulvic acid at the goethite-water interface. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69:325-339.
40. Yee M.M., Miyajima T., Takisawa N. Evaluation of amphiphilic properties of fulvic acid and humic acid by alkylpyridinium binding study. Colloids Surf. A 2006, 272:182-188.