MCLB (Much Curriculum Left Behind): A U.S. Calamity in the Making

Educational Forum

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 284-296

  Berliner, David C ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052250832     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131720903166788     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams, J. 1780. Family papers. Letter from John Adams to Abigail Adams, posted from Paris, May 12, 1780. Boston: The Massachusetts Historical Society.
2. Beck, T. A. 2007. Review of Sorbonne Confidential, trans. L. Zuckerman and D. Berman. Paris: Librarie Arthéme Fayard. Education Review. Available at: http://edrev.asu.edu/reviews/rev589.htm.
3. Bonnet, G., ed. 2002. The assessment of pupils' skills in English in eight European countries. The European Network of Policy Makers for the Evaluation of Educational Systems. Available at: http://www.institutodeevaluacion.mec.es/contenidos/internacional/Assessment_of_English_BED.pdf.
4. Center on Education Policy. 2006. From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author. Available at: http://www.ctredpol.org/nclb/Year4/CEP-NCLB-Report-4.pdf.
5. Deke, J., and J. Haimson. 2006. Expanding beyond academics: Who benefits and how. Issue Brief of the Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. ERIC ED 496293.
6. Finn, C. E., and D. Ravitch. 2007. Not by geeks alone. The Education Gadfly 7(30). Available at: http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/index.cfm?issue=302.
7. Foster, S. L. 2006. How Latino students negotiate the demands of high-stakes testing: A case study of one school in Texas. Ph.D. diss., Arizona State University, Mary Lou Fulton College of Education.
8. Galton, M. 2007. Learning and teaching in the primary classroom. Los Angeles: Sage.
9. Jones, B., and R. Egley. 2004. Voices from the frontlines: Teachers' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives 12(39). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39/.
10. Jones, M. G., B. D. Jones, B. Hardin, L. Chapman, T. Yarbrough, and M. Davis. 1999. The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan 81(3): 199-203.
11. Kozol, J. 2005. The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown/Random House.
12. Marchant, G. J., and S. E. Paulson. 2005. The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives 13(6). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n6/v13n6.pdf.
13. Nichols, S. L., and D. C. Berliner. 2007. Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14. Pont, B., D. Nusche, and D. Hopkins. 2008. Improving school leadership, Vol. 2: Case studies on system leadership. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
15. Pont, B., D. Nusche, and H. Moorman. 2008. Improving school leadership, Vol. 1: Policy and practice. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
16. Rothstein, R., and R. Jacobsen. 2007. A test of time: Unchanged priorities for student outcomes. The School Administrator 64(3): 36.
17. Suen, H. K., and L. Yu. 2006. Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam. Comparative Education Review 50(1): 46-65.
18. Taylor, G., J. Shepard, F. Kinner, and J. Rosenthal. 2003. A survey of teachers' perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost. CSE Technical Report 588. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
19. U.S. Department of Education. 2002. No child left behind. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
20. Zastrow, C., and H. Janc. 2004. The condition of the liberal arts in America's public schools: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.