Root-shoot competition interactions cause diversity loss after fertilization: A field experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau

Journal of Plant Ecology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 138-146

  Li, Wei ^a   Wen, Shujun ^a   Hu, Wenxiang ^a   Du, Guozhen ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Alpine meadow; diversity loss; functional groups; interactions; light competition hypothesis; shade; Tibetan plateau

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052231684     PISSN: 17529921     EISSN: 1752993X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtq031     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) Mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1-67.
2. Bai YF, Wu JG, Pan QM, et al. (2007) Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: Evidence from the Eurasian steppe. J Appl Ecol 44:1023-34.
3. Bertness MD, Hacker SD (1994) Physical stress and positive associations among marsh plants. Am Nat 144:363-72. (Pubitemid 2139136)
4. Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363-92.
5. Brooker RW, Kikvidze Z (2008) Importance: An overlooked concept in plant interaction research. J Ecol 96:703-8. (Pubitemid 351822127)
6. Brooker R, Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, et al. (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63-70. (Pubitemid 40518607)
7. Cahill JF (1999) Fertilization effects on interactions between aboveand belowground competition in an old field. Ecology 80:466-80.
8. Cahill JF (2002) Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species. Oikos 99:101-12.
9. Cahill JF (2003) Neighbourhood-scale diversity, composition and root crowding do not alter competition during drought in a native grassland. Ecol Lett 6:599-603.
10. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, et al. (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia 111:1-11.
11. Carson WP, Pickett STA (1990) Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:226-38. (Pubitemid 20425206)
12. Casper B, Jackson R (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:254-70.
13. Chapin FS, Bloom AJ, Field CB, et al. (1987) Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. BioScience 37:49-57.
14. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2002) Spatial scale dictates the productivity- biodiversity relationship. Nature 416:427-30. (Pubitemid 34272876)
15. Clark CM, Tilman D (2008) Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451:712-5. (Pubitemid 351220561)
16. Clements FE, Weaver JE, Hanson HC (1929) Plant Competition: An Analysis of Community Functions. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute.
17. Eek L, Zobel K (2001) Structure and diversity of a species-rich grassland community, treated with additional illumination, fertilization and mowing. Ecography 24:157-64. (Pubitemid 32635547)
18. Emery NC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2001) Competition and saltmarsh plant zonation: Stress tolerators may be dominant competitors. Ecology 82:2471-85. (Pubitemid 32908142)
19. Forbes SP, Schauwecker T, Weiher E (2001) Rarefaction does not eliminate the species richness-biomass relationship in calcareous black land prairies. J Veg Sci 12:525-32. (Pubitemid 33030545)
20. Gilliam FS (2006) Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to excess nitrogen deposition. J Ecol 94:1176-91. (Pubitemid 44511006)
21. Gjerde I, Sætersdal M, Rolstad J, et al. (2005) Productivity-diversity relationships for plants, bryophytes, lichens, and polypore fungi in six northern forest landscapes. Ecography 28:705-20. (Pubitemid 41751781)
22. Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, et al. (2000) Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:428-39. (Pubitemid 30343053)
23. Grace JB, Allain L, Allen C (2000) Factors associated with plant species richness in a coastal tall-grass prairie. J Veg Sci 11:443-52. (Pubitemid 30466975)
24. Grace JB, Keeley JE (2006) Astructural equationmodel analysis of postfire plant diversity in California shrublands. Ecol Appl 16:503-14.
25. Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902-10. (Pubitemid 29014857)
26. Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R (1997) Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79:259-81.
27. Gross KL, Willig MR, Gough L, et al. (2000) Patterns of species diversity and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:417-27. (Pubitemid 30343052)
28. Harris WN, Moretto AS, Distel RA, et al. (2007) Fire and grazing in grasslands of the Argentine Caldenal: Effects on plant and soil carbon and nitrogen. Acta Oecol 32:207-14. (Pubitemid 47391396)
29. Hautier Y, Niklaus PA, Hector A (2009) Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science 324:636-8.
30. Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2001) Nitrogen uptake and use by competing individuals in a Xanthium canadense stand. Oecologia 126:174-81. (Pubitemid 32449405)
31. Ives AR, Carpenter SR (2007) Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317:58-62. (Pubitemid 47056443)
32. Jackson RB, CaldwellMM(1992) Shading and the capture of localized soil nutrients: Nutrient contents, carbohydrates, and root uptake kinetics of a perennial tussock grass. Oecologia 91:457-62.
33. Keddy PA (2001) Competition. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
34. Kotowski W, van Diggelen R (2004) Light as an environmental filter in fen vegetation. J Veg Sci 15:583-94. (Pubitemid 39393896)
35. Lamb EG (2008) Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89:216-25. (Pubitemid 351345032)
36. Lamb EG, Cahill JF (2008) When competition doesn't matter: Grassland diversity and community composition. Am Nat 171:777-87. (Pubitemid 351706505)
37. Lamb EG, Kembel SW, Cahill JF (2009) Shoot, but not root, competition reduces community diversity in experimental mesocosms. J Ecol 97:155-63.
38. Lamb EG, Shore BS, Cahill JF (2007) Water and nitrogen addition differentially impact plant competition in a native rough fescue grassland. Plant Ecol 192:21-33. (Pubitemid 350067436)
39. Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, et al. (1997) Plant functional classifications: From general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474-8. (Pubitemid 28069363)
40. Lenz TI, Facelli JM (2003) Shade facilitates an invasive stem succulent in a chenopod shrubland in South Australia. Austral Ecol 28:480-90. (Pubitemid 37358527)
41. Luo YJ, Qin GL, Du GZ (2006) Importance of assemblage-level thinning: A field experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibet plateau. J Veg Sci 17:417-24.
42. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, et al. (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381-96. (Pubitemid 32908136)
43. Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS (2006) Critical analysis of root: Shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biol 11:1-13.
44. Moretto AS, Distel RA (1997) Competitive interactions between palatable and unpatable grasses native to a temperate semiarid rangeland of central Argentina. Plant Ecol 130:155-61.
45. Newman EI (1973) Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 244:310-1.
46. Niu KC, Choler P, Zhao BB, et al. (2009) The allometry of reproductive biomass in response to land use in Tibetan Alpine grasslands. Funct Ecol 23:274-83.
47. Niu KC, Luo YJ, Choler P, et al. (2008) The role of biomass allocation strategy on diversity loss due to fertilization. Basic Appl Ecol 9:485-93. (Pubitemid 351981958)
48. Pielou EC (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York: Wiley.
49. Rajaniemi TK (2002) Why does fertilization reduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition-based hypotheses. J Ecol 90:316-24. (Pubitemid 34305739)
50. Rajaniemi TK (2003) Evidence for size asymmetry of belowground competition. Basic Appl Ecol 4:239-47. (Pubitemid 36551477)
51. Rajaniemi TK, Allison VJ, Goldberg DE (2003) Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity. J Ecol 91:407-16. (Pubitemid 36658637)
52. 2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland species. New Phytol 150:435-48. (Pubitemid 32398605)
53. Schwinning S, Weiner J (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447-55. (Pubitemid 28126738)
54. Selaya NG, Oomen RJ, Netten JJC, et al. (2008) Biomass allocation and leaf life span in relation to light interception by tropical forest plants during the first years of secondary succession. J Ecol 96:1211-21.
55. Silvertown J, Dodd M, Gowing D, et al. (2006) Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. Ecology 87:S39-49. (Pubitemid 44564724)
56. Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (1997) Plant Functional Types, Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. 2, P availability and legume presence on calcareous grassland: Results of a glasshouse experiment. Funct Ecol 13:200-9.
58. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, et al. (2005) Functional-and abundancebasedmechanisms explain diversity loss due toNfertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4387-92. (Pubitemid 40397121)
59. Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Tilman D (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Tilman D, Pacala S (1993) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds). Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp 13-25.
62. Turkington R, John E, Watson S, et al. (2002) The effects of fertilization and herbivory on the herbaceous vegetation of the boreal forest in northwestern Canada: A 10-year study. J Ecol 90:325-37. (Pubitemid 34305740)
63. van Kuijk M, Anten NPR, Oomen RJ, et al. (2008) The limited importance of size-asymmetric light competition and growth of pioneer species in early secondary forest succession in Vietnam. Oecologia 157:1-12.
64. Vojtech E, Turnbull LA, Hector A (2007) Differences in light interception in grass monocultures predict short-term competitive outcomes under productive conditions. PLoS One 2:e499.
65. Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, et al. (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:257-300. (Pubitemid 30065628)
66. Weiner J (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425-7.
67. Welden CW, SlausonWL(1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance - an overlooked distinction and some implications. Q Rev Biol 61:23-44.
68. Wilson JB (1988) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25:279-96. (Pubitemid 19317485)