Fertility preservation and the role of robotics

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 431-448

  Gargiulo, Antonio R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

fertility preservation; myomectomy; ovarian transposition; reproductive surgery; robotic surgery; robotics; tubal reanastomosis

Indexed keywords

LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ADENOMYOSIS; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE FERTILITY; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE BLOOD LEVEL; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEIOMYOSARCOMA; LENGTH OF STAY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MYOMECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION; UTERUS RUPTURE;

FEMALE; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 80052221641     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b3b80     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, et al. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:898-906. (Pubitemid 38715999)
2. Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:567-576. (Pubitemid 33069615)
3. Gargiulo AR, Nezhat C. Robot-assisted laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy and single site laparoscopy in reproductive surgery. 2011;29:155-168.
4. Vlaovic PD, Sargent ER, Boker JR, et al. Immediate impact of an intensive oneweek laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists. J Soc Laparoendo Surgeons. 2008;12:1-8.
5. Passerotti CC, Passerotti AM, Dall'Oglio MF, et al. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Amer College Surgeons. 2009;208:576-586.
6. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, et al. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:377-382.
7. Falcone T, Golberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, et al. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: A case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9: 107-113. (Pubitemid 29136038)
8. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, et al. Preliminary experience with robotassisted laparoscopicmyomectomy.JAmer Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:511-518.
9. United Nations. Population Division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Contraceprive Use 2009. http://www.un.org/esa/population/ publications/contraceptive2011 - wallchart-wcu2011.xls 19-Apr-2011..
10. Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, et al. Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:889-895. (Pubitemid 29247091)
11. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A feasibility study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74: 1020-1023.
12. Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94: 1844-1847.
13. Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, et al. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109: 1375-1380. (Pubitemid 46869877)
14. Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, et al. Robotic tubal anastomosis: Surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1175-1179.
15. Sotrel G. Is surgical repair of the fallopian tubes ever appropriate? Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:176-185.
16. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: A prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:654-658. (Pubitemid 26070160)
17. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: A randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2663-2668. (Pubitemid 32000527)
18. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: Reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:933-941. (Pubitemid 47498380)
19. Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F, et al. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86: 159-165. (Pubitemid 43962952)
20. Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M, et al. Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Min Invas Gynecol. 2007;14:453-462. (Pubitemid 47042613)
21. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverses perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110: 801-807. (Pubitemid 47508743)
22. Liu G, Zolis L, Kung R, et al. The laparoscopic myomectomy: A survey of Canadian gynaecologists. JOGC. 2010;32:139-148.
23. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomiesa survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:167-175.
24. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, et al. Preliminary experience with robotassisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11: 511-518. (Pubitemid 39552657)
25. Rackow BW, Arici A. Fibroids and invitro fertilization: Which comes first? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:225-231. (Pubitemid 40705031)
26. Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:107.e1-6.
27. Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, et al. Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Intl J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12: 354-361. (Pubitemid 34839833)
28. Moghadam R, Lathi RB, Shahmohamady B, et al. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between leiomyoma and adenomyosis. J Soc Laparoendo Surgeons. 2006;10: 216-219.
29. Tulikangas PK, Smith T, Falcone T, et al. Gross and histologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries with four different energy sources. Fertil Steril. 2001;75: 806-810. (Pubitemid 32273519)
30. Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Min Invas Gynecol. 2008;15:621-623.
31. Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, et al. Unidirectional barbed suture vs. continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: A randomized study. J Min Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:725-729.
32. Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:566.e1-5.
33. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, et al. Roboticassisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91: 556-559.
34. Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, et al. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117 (2 Pt 1):256-265.
35. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S IV, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopicmyomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:698-705. (Pubitemid 350008145)
36. Bisharah M, Tulandi T. Laparoscopic preservation of ovarian function: An underused procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:367-370. (Pubitemid 36249972)
37. Morice P, Castaigne D, Haie-Meder C, et al. Laparoscopic ovarian transposition for pelvic malignancies: Indications and functional outcomes. Fertil Steril. 1998;70: 956-960. (Pubitemid 28499096)
38. Kuohung W, Ram K, Cheng DM, et al. Laparoscopic oophoropexy prior to radiation for pediatric brain tumor and subsequent ovarian function. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:117-121. (Pubitemid 351767335)
39. Terenziani M, Piva L, Meazza C, et al. Oophoropexy: A relevant role in preservation of ovarian function after pelvic irradiation. Fertil Steril. 2009;91: 935.e15-16.
40. Molpus KL,Wedergren JS, Carlson MA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. J Soc Laparoendo Surgeons. 2003;7:59-62.
41. Barton SE, Politch JA, Benson CB, et al. Transabdominal follicular aspiration for oocyte retrieval in patients with ovaries inaccessible by transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1773-1776.