Field data analysis of boar semen quality

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 46, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages 59-63

  Broekhuijse, M L W J ^a,b   Feitsma, H ^c   Gadella, B M ^b  

^a Varkens KI Nederland   (Germany)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c TOPIGS Norsvin   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

EID: 80052221624     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01861.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amann RP, 1989: Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J Androl 10, 89-98.
2. Anil SS, Larriestra A, Deen J, Morrison RB, Minion L, 2004: A retrospective study on the preserving capacity of a commercial boar semen extender. Theriogenology 62, 425-436.
3. Bergsma R, Feitsma H, 2005: Morphology examination of semen. Proceedings of 17th European Artificial Insemination Veterinarians Meeting. Crakow, Poland, pp. 62-69.
4. Boe-Hansen GD, Esboll AK, Greve T, Christensen P, 2005: Increasing storage time of extended boar semen reduces sperm DNA integrity. Theriogenology 63, 2006-2019.
5. Boe-Hansen GB, Christensen P, Vibjerg D, Nielsen MBF, Hedeboe AM, 2008: Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility. Theriogenology 69, 728-736.
6. Didion BA, 2008: Computer-assisted semen analysis and its utility for profiling boar semen samples. Theriogenology 70, 1374-1376.
7. Feitsma H, 2009: Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in The Netherlands, a review. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 37, 61-71.
8. Foxcroft GR, Dyck MK, Ruiz-Sanchez A, Novak S, Dixon WT, 2008: Identifying useable semen. Theriogenology 70, 1324-1336.
9. Gadea J, 2005: Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 63, 431-444.
10. Gadea J, Sellés E, Marco MA, 2004: The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reprod Dom Anim 39, 303-308.
11. Gill MC, García-Herreros M, Barón FJ, Aparicio IM, Santos AJ, García-Marín LJ, 2009: Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology 71, 254-263.
12. Hancock JL, Hovel GLR, 1959: The collection of boar semen. Vet Rec 71, 664-665.
13. Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HDM, Reed HCB, Curnock RM, 1997: Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl 18, 312-323.
14. Langendijk P, Soede NM, Kemp B, 2005: Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows. Theriogenology 63, 500-513.
15. Mircu C, Cernescu H, Igna V, Knop R, Frunza I, Ardelean V, Bonca GH, Otava G, Zarcula S, Korodi G, Ardelean A, 2008: Boar semen evaluation using CASA and its relation to fertility. Lucrvri Stintifice Medicinǎ Veterinarǎ XLI, 203-212.
16. Paulenz H, Kommusrud F, Hofmo PO, 2000: Effect of long-term storage at different temperatures on the quality of liquid boar semen. Reprod Dom Anim 35, 83-87.
17. Popwell JM, Flowers WL, 2004: Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars. Anim Reprod Sci 81, 97-113.
18. Smital J, 2009: Effects influencing boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 110, 335-346.
19. Steverink DW, Soede NM, Bouwman EG, Kemp B, 1997: Influence of insemination ovulation interval and sperm cell dose on fertilization in sows. J Reprod Fertil 111, 165-171.
20. Steverink DWB, Soede NM, Kemp B, 1999: Registration of oestrus duration can help to improve insemination strategies at commercial farms. Reprod Domest Anim 34, 330-333.
21. Sutkeviciene N, Andersson MA, Zilinskas H, Andersson M, 2005: Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress. Theriogenology 63, 739-747.
22. Sutkeviciene N, Riskeviciene V, Januskauskas A, Zilinskas H, Andersson M, 2009: Assessment of sperm quality traits in relation to fertility in boar semen. Acta Vet Scand 16, 51-53.
23. Tardif S, Laforest J-P, Cormier N, Bailey JL, 1999: The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 52, 447-459.
24. Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A, 2004: Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods. Reprod Dom Anim 39, 447-453.
25. Vyt P, Maes D, Quinten C, Rijsselaere T, Deley W, Aerts M, de Kruif A, Van Soom A, 2008: Detailed motility examination of porcine semen and its predictive value towards reproductive performance in sows. Flem Vet J 77, 291-298.