Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of Audit Committees

Auditing

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 125-156

  Sharma, Vineeta D ^a   Sharma, Divesh S ^a   Ananthanarayanan, Umapathy ^b  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Accruals; Audit committee; Auditor independence; Corporate governance;

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052214249     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: 15587991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-10111     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 69-88.
2. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. An empirical investigation of audit fees, non-audit fees, and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20: 215-234.
3. Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 371-406.
4. Ahmed, K., and M. Roush. 1998. Perceptions of bank loan officers regarding financial covenants in private debt contracts: Evidence from New Zealand. Pacific Accounting Review 10 (1): 73-87.
5. Antle, R., E. A. Gordon, G. Narayanamoorthy, and L. Zhou. 2006. The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 27 (3): 235-266.
6. Antle, R., P. A. Griffin, D. J. Teece, and O. E. Williamson. 1997. An Economic Analysis of Auditor Independence for a Multi-Client, Multi-Service Public Accounting Firm. Report Prepared for the AICPA by the Law and Economics Consulting Group, Inc. New York, NY: AICPA.
7. Ashbaugh, H., R. Lafond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611-639.
8. Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). 2003. Corporate Governance Council, Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations. Sydney, Australia: ASX.
9. Basioudis, I., E. Papakonstantinou, and M. Geiger. 2008. Audit fees, non-audit fees and auditor goingconcern reporting decisions in the United Kingdom. Abacus 44 (3): 284-309.
10. Baxter, P., and J. Cotter. 2009. Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting and Finance 49: 267-290.
11. Beck, P. J., T. J. Frecka, and I. Solomon. 1988. A model of the market for MAS and audit services: Knowledge spillovers and auditor-auditee bonding. Journal of Accounting Literature 7: 50-64.
12. Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1): 1-24.
13. Bédard, J., S. M. Chtourou, and I. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 13-35.
14. Behn, B. K., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and R. H. Hermanson. 1997. The determinants of audit client satisfaction among clients of Big 6 firms. Accounting Horizons 11 (1): 7-24.
15. Behn, B. K., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and R. H. Hermanson. 1999. Client satisfaction and Big 6 audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (4): 587-608.
16. Brown, L. D. 2001. A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profits versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research 39: 221-241.
17. Cahan, S., D. Emanuel, D. Hay, and N. Wong. 2008. Non-audit fees, long term auditor client relationships and earnings management. Accounting and Finance 48: 181-207.
18. Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2000. Audit committee characteristics and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75 (4): 453-467.
19. Carcello, J. V., C. W. Hollingsworth, A. Klein, and T. L. Neal. 2006. Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Competing Governance Mechanisms, and Earnings Management. Working paper, The University of Tennessee.
20. Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following 'new' going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 95-117.
21. Chan, K. K., J. Wong, and N. Wong. 2002. Non-audit services and auditor independence. Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand 81 (5): 27-32.
22. Chaplin, D. 2010. Finance companies-What's the message in the mess? The New Zealand Herald (April 2). Available at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/finance-companies-in-freefall/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501786&objectid=10635889
23. Chung, H., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, non-audit services and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 931-955.
24. Cohen, J. B. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Craswell, A. T. 1999. Does the provision of non-audit services impair auditor independence? International Journal of Auditing 3: 29-40.
26. Craswell, A. T., D. Stokes, and J. Laughton. 2002. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (2): 253-275.
27. Davidson, R., J. Goodwin-Stewart, and P. Kent. 2005. Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting and Finance 45: 241-267.
28. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
29. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
30. DeFond, M. L., and J. R. Francis. 2005. Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Supplement): 5-30.
31. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66 (July): 643-655.
32. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1993. Factors related to auditor-client disagreements over incomeincreasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research 9 (2): 415-431.
33. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 77 (1/2): 145-176.
34. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1247-1274.
35. Dhaliwal, D. S., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2010. The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of experts on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 787-827.
36. Ferguson, M. J., G. S. Seow, and D. Young. 2004. Non-audit services and earnings management: U.K. evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (4): 813-841.
37. Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2006. The Combined Code on Corporate Governance. London, England: FRC.
38. Firth, M. 1997. The provision of non-audit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (2): 1-21.
39. Firth, M. 2002. Auditor-provided consultancy services and their associations with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29 (5/6): 661-693.
40. Francis, J. R. 2002. Are auditors compromised by non-audit services? Assessing the evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (3): 747-760.
41. Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999a. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (2): 17-34.
42. Francis, J. R., D. Stokes, and D. Anderson. 1999b. City markets as a unit of analysis in audit research and the re-examination of Big 6 market shares. Abacus 35 (2): 185-206.
43. Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditor's fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77: 71-105.
44. Geiger, M. A., and D. V. Rama. 2003. Audit fees, non-audit fess and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 53-69.
45. Gore, P., P. Pope, and A. Singh. 2001. Non-Audit Services, Auditor Independence, and Earnings Management. Working paper, Lancaster University.
46. Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic Econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
47. Hay, D., and W. R. Knechel. 2010. The effects of advertising and solicitation on audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29 (1): 60-81.
48. Hay, D., W. R. Knechel, and V. Li. 2006. Non-audit services and auditor independence: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 33 (5/6): 715-734.
49. Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. C. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-867.
50. Hossain, M., K. Ahmed, and J. M. Godfrey. 2005. Investment opportunity set and voluntary disclosure of prospective information: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32 (5/6): 871-907.
51. Huang, H.-W., S. Mishra, and K. Raghunandan. 2007. Types of non-audit fees and financial reporting quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (May): 133-145.
52. Kent, P., J. Routledge, and J. Stewart. 2010. Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance. Accounting and Finance 50: 171-195.
53. Kida, T. 1980. An investigation into auditors' continuity and related qualification judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (2): 506-523.
54. Kinney, W. R., Z. V. Palmrose, and S. W. Scholz. 2004. Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 561-588.
55. Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 375-400.
56. Knechel, W. R., and D. S. Sharma. 2008. Auditor-Provided Non-Audit Services and Audit Effectiveness and Efficiency: Evidence from Pre- and Post-SOX Audit Report Lags. Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Audit Research (ISAR), Pasadena, CA.
57. Kothari, S. P., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 163-197.
58. Krishnan, G. V., and G. Visvanathan. 2008. Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors' accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (3): 827-857.
59. Larcker, D. F., and S. A. Richardson. 2004. Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 625-658.
60. Lennox, C. S. 1999. Non-audit fees, disclosure and audit quality. The European Accounting Review 8 (2): 239-252.
61. Levitt, A. 1998. The numbers game. Remarks given at the NYU Center for Law and Business, New York, NY, September 28.
62. Matsumoto, D. A. 2002. Management's incentives to avoid negative earnings surprise. The Accounting Review 77 (3): 483-514.
63. Melancon, B. 2000. The proposed SEC rule on auditor independence and its consequences. Journal of Accountancy (October): 26-28.
64. Ministry of Economic Development. 2009. Audit Regulation Oversight. Cabinet Paper, October 19. Available at http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentPage_42165.aspx#B2
65. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1): 293-315.
66. Naiker, V., and D. S. Sharma. 2009. Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review 84 (2): 559-587.
67. Nelson, M. W., J. A. Elliott, R. L. Tarpley, and M. Gibbins. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 175-212.
68. New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA). 2003. Corporate Governance Principles. Wellington, New Zealand: NZICA.
69. Pacini, C., W. Hillison, and D. Sinason. 2000. Auditor liability to third parties: An international focus. Managerial Auditing Journal 15 (8): 394-406.
70. Palmrose, Z. V. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1): 55-73.
71. Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32 (7/8): 1311-1346.
72. Raghunandan, K., W. J. Read, and S. J. Whisenant. 2003. Initial evidence on the association between nonaudit fees and restated financial statements. Accounting Horizons 17 (3): 223-234.
73. Rainsbury, E. A., M. Bradbury, and S. F. Cahan. 2008a. Firm characteristics and audit committees complying with "best practice" membership guidelines. Accounting and Business Research 38 (5): 393-408.
74. Rainsbury, E. A., M. Bradbury, and S. F. Cahan. 2008b. The Impact of Audit Committee Quality on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Fees. Working paper, UNITEC.
75. Reynolds, J., and J. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 375-400.
76. Rosenstein, S., and J. Wyatt. 1997. Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 44 (2): 229-250.
77. Ruddock, C., S. J. Taylor, and S. L. Taylor. 2006. Non-audit services and earnings conservatism: Is auditor independence impaired? Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (3): 701-746.
78. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2000. Final Rule: Revision of the Commission's Auditor Independence Requirements. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
79. Securities Commission New Zealand (NZSEC). 2004. Corporate Governance in New Zealand Principles and Guidance. Wellington, New Zealand.
80. Securities Commission New Zealand (NZSEC). 2006. Review of Financial Reporting by Issuers-Cycle 6. Wellington, New Zealand.
81. Securities Commission New Zealand (NZSEC). 2007. Independent Audit Regulation and Oversight in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.
82. Sharma, D. S. 2001. The association between non-audit services and the propensity of going concern qualifications: Implications for audit independence. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 8 (2): 143-155.
83. Sharma, D. S., and J. Sidhu. 2001. Professionalism vs commercialism: The association between non-audit services and audit independence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 28 (5/6): 595-629.
84. Sharma, V. D. 2004. Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 105-117.
85. Sharma, V. D., and C. Kuang. 2008. Audit Committee Characteristics and Earnings Management in New Zealand. Proceedings of the International Accounting Section and IAAER Joint 2008 Midyear Conference, San Diego, CA.
86. Sharma, V. D., V. Naiker, and B. Lee. 2009. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons 23 (3): 245-263.
87. Shu, S. 2000. Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (2): 173-205.
88. Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (2): 679-702.
89. Singapore Code of Corporate Governance (SCCG). 2005. Council on Corporate Disclosure and Governance. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.
90. Turner, L. E., J. P. Williams, and T. R. Weirich. 2005. An inside look at auditor changes. The CPA Journal 75 (11): 1-12.
91. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services. 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law No. 107-204. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
92. Wines, G. 1994. Auditor independence, audit qualifications and the provision of non-audit services: A note. Accounting and Finance 34 (1): 75-86.
93. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: The roles of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (3): 295-316.
94. Zhang, B., and D. Emanuel. 2008. The provision of non-audit services and earnings conservatism: Do New Zealand companies compromise their independence? Accounting Research Journal 21 (2): 195-221.