In Vitro experimental investigation of voice production

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 305-322

  Kniesburges, Stefan ^a   Thomson, Scott L ^b   Barney, Anna ^c   Triep, Michael ^d   Šidlof, Petr ^e   Horáček, Jaromir ^e   Brücker, Christoph ^d   Becker, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Brigham Young University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d TU BERGAKADEMIE FREIBERG   (Germany)

^e INSTITUTE OF THERMOMECHANICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Artificial vocal folds; Flow induced acoustics; Fluid structure acoustic interaction; Glottal fluid flow; Human phonation; Structural dynamics; Voice

Indexed keywords

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

ACOUSTIC INTERACTION; ARTIFICIAL VOCAL FOLD; FLOW INDUCED; FLOW-INDUCED ACOUSTIC; FLUID-FLOW; FLUID-STRUCTURE-ACOUSTIC INTERACTION; FLUID-STRUCTURES; GLOTTAL FLUID FLOW; HUMAN PHONATION; VOCAL FOLDS;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

ACOUSTICS; ANATOMY; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; DYNAMICS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; LARYNX; NONHUMAN; PHONATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VOCAL CORD;

EID: 80052202362     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489311796904637     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Titze IR. Principles of voice production. Prentice Hall; 1994.
2. Titze IR, Alipour F. The myoelastic aerodynamic theory of phonation. National Center for Voice and Speech; 2006.
3. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. de Gruyter Mouton; 1970.
4. Fant G. The source filter concept in voice production. STL-QPSR 1981; 22(1): 21-37.
5. McCoy S. Your Voice: An Inside View. Inside View Press; 2004.
6. Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F, Hoppe U. Vocal fold vibration irregularities caused by different types of laryngeal asymmetry. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 260: 412-17.
7. Kitzing P. Clinical applications of electroglottography. J Voice 1990; 4(3): 238-49.
8. Wendler J. Stroboscopy. J Voice 1992; 6(2): 149-54.
9. Döllinger M. The next step in voice assessment: High-Speed digital endoscopy and objective evaluation. Cur Bioinform 2009; 4: 101-11.
10. van den Berg J, Zantema JT, Doornenbal P. On the air resistance and the bernoulli effect of the human larynx. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29(5): 626-31.
11. Scherer RC, Shinwari D, Witt KJD, Zhang C, Kucinschi BR, Afjeh AA. Intraglottal pressure profiles for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a divergence angle of 10 degrees. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109(4): 1616-30.
12. Bailly L, Pelorson X, Henrich N, Ruty N. Inuence of a constriction in the near field of the vocal folds: physical modeling and experimental validation. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124(5): 3296-308.
13. Bailly L, Henrich N, Pelorson X. Vocal fold and ventricular fold vibration in period-doubling phonation: Physiological description and aerodynamic modeling. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127(5): 3212-22.
14. Horáček J, Šidlof P, Uruba V, Vesely J, Radolf V, Bula V. PIV Measurement of flow-patterns in a human vocal tract model. In: Boone M, Eds. Proceedings NAG/DAGA 2009; RotterdAm NAG and DEGA; 2009; p. 1737-40.
15. Titze IR. The physics of small-amplitude oscillation of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83(4): 1536-52.
16. Titze IR. Nonlinear source-filter coupling in phonation: Theory. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123(5): 2733-49.
17. Titze IR, Worley AS. Modeling source-filter interaction in belting and high-pitched operatic male singing. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126(3): 1530-40.
18. Thomson S. Fluid-Structure Interactions within the Human Larynx [PhD Thesis]. Purdue University; 2004.
19. Min YB, Titze IR, Alipour-Haghighi F. Stress-strain response of the human vocal ligament. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 563-69.
20. Tran QT, Berke GS, Gerratt BR, Kreiman J. Measurement of Young's modulus in the in vivo human vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 584-91.
21. Chan RW, Rodriguez ML. A simple-shear rheometer for linear viscoelastic characterization of vocal fold tissues at phonatory frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124(2): 1207-19.
22. Wegel RL. Theory of vibration of the larynx (A). J Acoust Soc Am 1929; 1(1): 1-21.
23. Scherer RC, Witt KJD, Kucinschi BR. The effect of exit radii on intraglottal pressure distributions in the convergent glottis. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110(5): 2267-9.
24. Pickup BA, Thomson SL. Flow-induced vibratory response of idealized versus magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic vocal fold models. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128(3): EL124-EL129.
25. Zhang Z, Neubauer J, Berry DA. Aerodynamically and acoustically driven modes of vibration in a physical model of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2006 120(5 Pt 1): 2841-9.
26. Neubauer J, Zhang Z, Miraghaie R, Berry DA. Coherent structures of the near field flow in a self-oscillating physical model of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121(2): 1102-18.
27. Popolo PS, Titze IR. Qualification of a quantitative laryngeal imaging system using videostroboscopy and videokymography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008; 117(6): 404-12.
28. Pickup BA, Thomson SL. Inuence of asymmetric stiffness on the structural and aerodynamic response of synthetic vocal fold models. J Biomech 2009; 42(14): 2219-25.
29. Zhang Z. Characteristics of phonation onset in a two-layer vocal fold model. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 125(2): 1091-102.
30. Riede T, Tokuda IT, Munger JB, Thomson SL. Mammalian laryngeal air sacs add variability to the vocal tract impedance: Physical and computational modeling. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124(1): 634-47.
31. Ishizaka K, Matsudaira M. Fluid mechanical considerations of vocal cord vibration. Speech Commun Res Lab, Santa Barbara, CA. Monograph 8, 1972.
32. Scherer RC, Titze IR, Curtis JF. Pressure-flow relationships in two models of the larynx having rectangular glottal shapes. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73(2): 668-76.
33. Fulcher LP, Scherer RC, Zhai G, Zhu Z. Analytic representation of volume flow as a function of geometry and pressure in a static physical model of the glottis. J Voice 2006; 20(4): 489-512.
34. Binh N, Gauffin J. Aerodynamic measurements in an enlarged static laryngeal model. STL-QPSR 1983; 24(2-3): 1.
35. Li S, Scherer RC, Wan M, Wang S, Wu H. The effect of glottal angle on intraglottal pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119(1): 539-48.
36. Scherer RC, Torkaman S, Kucinschi BR, Afjeh AA. Intraglottal pressures in a three-dimensional model with a non-rectangular glottal shape. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128(2): 828-38.
37. Alipour F, Scherer RC. Pressure and velocity profiles in a static mechanical hemilarynx model. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112(6): 2996-3003.
38. Fulcher LP, Scherer RC, Witt KJD, Thapa P, Bo Y, Kucinschi BR. Pressure distributions in a static physical model of the hemilarynx: measurements and computations. J Voice 2010; 24(1): 2-20.
39. Coanda H. Device for deecting a stream of elastic fluid projected into an elastic fluid. US Patent 2052869; 1935.
40. Pelorson X, Hirschberg A, van Hassel RR, Wijnands APJ, Auregan Y. Theoretical and experimental study of quasisteady-flow separation within the glottis during phonation. Application to a modified two-mass model. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96(6): 3416-31.
41. Shinwari D, Scherer RC, DeWitt KJ, Afjeh AA. Flow visualization and pressure distributions in a model of the glottis with a symmetric and oblique divergent angle of 10 degrees. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113(1): 487-97.
42. Scherer RC, Shinwari D, Witt KJD, Zhang C, Kucinschi BR, Afjeh AA. Intraglottal pressure distributions for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a uniform duct (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112(4): 1253-6.
43. Hofmans GCJ, Groot G, Ranucci M, Graziani G, Hirschberg A. Unsteady flow through in-vitro models of the glottis. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113(3): 1658-75.
44. Erath BD, Plesniak MW. An investigation of bimodal jet trajectory in flow through scaled models of the human vocal tract. Exp Fluids 2006; 40(5): 683-96.
45. Li S, Wan M, Wang S. The effects of the false vocal fold gaps on intralaryngeal pressure distributions and their effects on phonation. Sci China C Life Sci 2008; 51(11): 1045-51.
46. Alipour F, Scherer RC, Knowles J. Velocity distributions in glottal models. J Voice 1996; 10(1): 50-58.
47. Kucinschi BR, Scherer RC, DeWitt KJ, Ng TTM. Flow visualization and acoustic onsequences of the air moving through a static model of the human larynx. J Biomech Eng 2006; 128(3): 380-90.
48. Zhang Z, Mongeau L, Frankel SH, Thomson S, Park JB. Sound generation by steady flow through glottis-shaped orifices. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116(3): 1720-18.
49. Cisonni J, Hirtum AV, Pelorson X, Willems J. Theoretical simulation and experimental validation of inverse quasi-onedimensional steady and unsteady glottal flow models. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124(1): 535-45.
50. Krane M, Barry M, Wei T. Unsteady behavior of flow in a scaledup vocal folds model. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122(6): 3659-70.
51. Krane MH, Barry M, Wei T. Dynamics of temporal variations in phonatory flow. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128(1): 372-83.
52. Deverge M, Pelorson X, Vilain C, Lagree PY. Inuence of collision on the flow through in-vitro rigid models of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114(6): 3354-62.
53. Mongeau L, Franchek N, Coker CH, Kubli RA. Characteristics of a pulsating jet through a small modulated orifice, with application to voice production. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102(2): 1121-33.
54. Zhang Z, Mongeau L, Frankel SH. Experimental verification of the quasisteady approximation for aerodynamic sound generation by pulsating jets in tubes. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112(4): 1652-63.
55. Zhang Z, Mongeau LG. Broadband sound generation by confined pulsating jets in a mechanical model of the human larynx. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119(6): 3995-4005.
56. Park JB, Mongeau L. Instantaneous orifice discharge coefficient of a physical, driven model of the human larynx. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121(1): 442-55.
57. Park JB, Mongeau L. Experimental investigation of the influence of a posterior gap on glottal flow and sound. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124(2): 1171-9.
58. Shadle CH, Barney AM, Thomas DW. An investigation into the acoustics and aerodynamics of the larynx. In: Gauffin, Hammarberg B, Eds. Vocal Fold Physiology: Acoustic, Perceptual and Physiological Aspects of Voice Mechanisms. Singular Publishing Group 1991; p. 73-82.
59. Barney A, Shadle CH, Davies POAL. Fluid flow in a dynamic mechanical model of the vocal folds and tract. I. Measurements and theory. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(1): 444-55.
60. Shadle CH, Barney A, Davies POAL. Fluid flow in a dynamic mechanical model of the vocal folds and tract. II. Implications for speech production studies. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(1): 456-66.
61. Alipour F, Scherer RC. Effects of oscillation of a mechanical hemilarynx model on mean transglottal pressures and flows. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110(3): 1562-9.
62. Hyakutake T, Deguchi S, Shiota A, Nishioka Y, Yanase S, Washio S. Effect of constriction oscillation on flow for potential application to vocal fold mechanics: Numerical analysis and experiment. J Biomech Sci Eng 2006; 1(2): 290-303.
63. Rigau J, Farre R, Trepat X, Shusterman D, Navajas D. Oscillometric assessment of airway obstruction in a mechanical model of vocal cord dysfunction. J Biomech 2004; 37(1): 37-43.
64. Triep M, Brücker C, Schröder W. High-speed PIV measurements of the flow downstream of a dynamic mechanical model of the human vocal folds. Exp Fluids 2005; 39(2): 232-45.
65. Triep M, Brücker C. Three-dimensional nature of the glottal jet. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127(3): 1537-47.
66. Triep M, Brücker C, Stingl M, Döllinger M. Optimized transformation of the glottal motion into a mechanical model. Med Eng Phys 2010; In press.
67. Kirmse C, Triep M, Brücker C, Döllinger M, Stingl M. Experimental flow study of modeled regular and irregular glottal closure types. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 2010; 35(1): 45-50.
68. Kucinschi BR, Scherer RC, DeWitt KJ, Ng TTM. An experimental analysis of the pressures and flows within a driven mechanical model of phonation. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119(5): 3011-3021.
69. Titze IR, Schmidt SS, Titze MR. Phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(5): 3080-4.
70. Chan RW, Titze IR, Titze MR. Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101(6): 3722-7.
71. Chan RW, Titze IR. Dependence of phonation threshold pressure on vocal tract acoustics and vocal fold tissue mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119(4): 2351-62.
72. Kataoka H, Kitajima K, Owaki S. Effects of transglottal pressure on fundamental frequency of phonation: study with a rubber model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110(1): 56-62.
73. Owaki S, Kataoka H, Shimizu T. Relationship between transglottal pressure and fundamental frequency of phonation-study using a rubber model. J Voice 2010; 24(2): 127-32.
74. Ruty N, Hirtum AV, Pelorson X, Lopez I, Hirschberg A. A mechanical experimental setup to simulate vocal folds vibrations. Preliminary results. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 2005; 40: 161-75.
75. Ruty N, Pelorson X, Hirtum AV, Lopez-Arteaga I, Hirschberg A. An in vitro setup to test the relevance and the accuracy of loworder vocal folds models. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121(1): 479-90.
76. van Hirtum A, Cisonni J, Ruty N, Pelorson X, Lopez I, van Uittert F. Experimental validation of some issues in lip and vocal fold physical models. Acta Acustica 2007; 93(2): 314-23.
77. Deguchi S, Miyake Y, Tamura Y, Washio S. Wavelike motion of a mechanical vocal fold model at the onset of self-excited oscillation. J Biomech Sci Eng 2006; 1(1): 246-55.
78. Thomson SL, Mongeau L, Frankel FH. Physical and numerical flow-excited vocal fold model. In: Third International Workshop MAVEBA; 2003.
79. Thomson SL, Mongeau L, Frankel SH. Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118(3): 1689-700.
80. Spencer M, Siegmund T, Mongeau L. Determination of superior surface strains and stresses, and vocal fold contact pressure in a synthetic larynx model using digital image correlation. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123(2): 1089-103.
81. Johnson KL. Contact Mechanics. Reprint ed. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
82. Becker S, Kniesburges S, Muller S, et al. Flow-structure-acoustic interaction in a human voice model. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 125(3): 1351-61.
83. Blake WK. Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration. vol. 1 and 2. Academic; 1986.
84. Sidlof P, Doare O, Cadot O, Chaigne A, Horacek J. Mathematical and physical modeling of ow-induced vibrations of human vocal folds. In: 50 International Conference on Flow Induced Vibration - FIV 2008. Prague, Czech Republic; 2008; p. 141-6.
85. Šidlof P, Doare O, Cadot O, Chaigne A. Measurement of flow separation in a human vocal folds model, Exp Fluids. Exp Fluids 2011; In press.
86. Horáček J, Graf S. Mathematical modelling of airflow in the glottal region and its comparison with experimental data. In: Proceedings 6th International Workshop on Models and Analysis of Vocal Emissions for Biomedical Applications - MAVEBA 2009. Firenze, Italy: Firenze University Press; 2009; p. 203-6.
87. Berry DA, Zhang Z, Neubauer J. Mechanisms of irregular vibration in a physical model of the vocal folds. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120(3): EL36-EL42.
88. Zhang Z, Neubauer J, Berry DA. The influence of subglottal acoustics on laboratory models of phonation. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120(3): 1558-69.
89. Zhang Z, Neubauer J, Berry DA. Inuence of vocal fold stiffness and acoustic loading on flow-induced vibration of a single-layer vocal fold model. J Sound Vib 2009; 322(1-2): 299-313.
90. Zhang Z. Vibration in a self-oscillating vocal fold model with leftright asymmetry in body-layer stiffness. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128(5): 279-85.
91. Drechsel JS, Thomson SL. Influence of supraglottal structures on the glottal jet exiting a two-layer synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold model. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123(6): 4434-4445.
92. Gray H. Henry Gray's Anatomy of the Human Body; 1918.