Earmarks and EPSCoR: Shaping the distribution, quality, and quantity of university research

Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 149-172

  Payne, A Abigail ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052176160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2001. House and Senate Earmark R&D Funds in USDA, NASA, and DOE Budgets, mimeo, www.aaas.org.
2. Brainard, J., and R. Southwick. 2001. A record year at the federal trough:Colleges feast on $1.67-billion in earmarks: Budget surplus feeds Congress's pork-barrel spending, intensifying criticism. Chronicle of Higher Education 47 (48).
3. Carnegie Foundation. 1994. Classification of the Higher Educational Institutions. Carnegie Foundation.
4. Chubin, D., and E. Hackett. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
5. Drew, D. E. 1985. Strengthening Academic Science. New York: Praeger.
6. Feller, I. 2000. Strategic options to enhance the research competitiveness of EPSCoR universities. In Strategies for Competitiveness in Academic Research, ed. J. S. Hauger and C. McEnaney. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
7. Geiger, R. L. 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251-71.
9. Heckman, J. H., Ichimura, J. Smith, and P. Todd. 1998. Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66: 1017-98.
10. Kleinman, D. L. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
11. Lambright, W. H. 2000. Building state science: The EPSCoR experience. In Strategies for Competitiveness in Academic Research, ed. J. S. Hauger and C. McEnaney. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12. Payne, A. A. 2002. Do congressional earmarks increase research productivity at universities? Science and Public Policy 29 (5): 313-400.
13. Payne, A. A. 2002. The role of politically motivated subsidies on university research activities. Educational Policy 17 (1): 12-37.
14. Savage, J. D. 1999. Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Politics of the Academic Pork Barrel. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Savage, J. D. 1991. Saints and cardinals in appropriations committees and the fight against distributive politics. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (3): 329-47.
16. Teich, A., ed. 2000. Competitiveness in Academic Research. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.