Alert-QSAR. Implications for electrophilic theory of chemical carcinogenesis

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 5098-5134

  Putz, Mihai V ^a   Ionaşcu, Cosmin ^a   Putz, Ana Maria ^a,b   Ostafe, Vasile ^a  

^a WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA   (Romania)

^b ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTS   (Romania)

Author keywords

Electronegativity and chemical hardness reactivity principles; Genotoxic carcinogenesis; OECD principles; Residual QSAR; Structural alerts

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENICITY; CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHILICITY; GENOTOXICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; KERNEL METHOD; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RAT; STEREOCHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY;

RATTUS;

CARCINOGEN;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CARCINOGENS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RATS;

EID: 80052146493     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12085098     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Yamagiwa, K.; Ichikawa, K. Experimental study of the pathogenesis of carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. 1918, 3, 1-29.
2. Yoshida, T. Uber die serienweise verfolgung der veranderungen der leber der experimentellen hepatomerzeugung durch O-Aminoazotoluol. Trans. Jpn. Pathol. Soc. 1933, 23, 636-638.
3. Hueper, W.C.; Wiley, F.H.; Wolfe, H.D. Experimental production of bladder tumors in dogs by administration of beta-naphthylamine. J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 1938, 20, 46-84.
4. Haddow, A. Sir Ernest Laurence Kennaway FRS, 1881-1958: Chemical causation of cancer then and today. Perspect. Biol. Med. 1974, 17, 543-588.
5. Miller, J.A.; Miller, E. Ultimate chemical carcinogens as reactive mutagenic electrophiles. In Origins of Human Cancer; Hiatt, H.H., Watson, J.D., Winsten, J.A., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Huntington, NY, USA, 1977; pp. 605-628.
6. Miller, E.C.; Miller, J.A. Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules. Cancer 1981, 47, 2327-2345.
7. Ames, B.N. The detection of environmental mutagens and potential carcinogens. Cancer 1984, 53, 2030-2040.
8. Ashby, J.; Tennant, R.W. Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested by the U.S. NCI/NTP. Mutat. Res. 1988, 204, 17-115.
9. Benigni, R.; Netzeva, T.I.; Benfenati, E.; Bossa, C.; Franke, R.; Helma, C.; Hulzebos, E.; Marchant, C.; Richard, A.; Woo, Y.T.; et al. The expanding role of predictive toxicology: An update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens. J. Environ. Sci. Health C 2007, 25, 53-97.
10. Ferrari, T.; Gini, G. An open source multistep model to predict mutagenicity from statistical analysis and relevant structural alerts. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4 (Suppl 1), S2.
11. Nair, P.C.; Sobhia, M.E. Comparative QSTR studies for predicting mutagenicity of nitro compounds. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2008, 26, 916-934.
12. Pérez-Garrido, A.; Helguera, A.M.; Rodríguez, F.G.; Cordeiro, M.N.D.S. QSAR models to predict mutagenicity of acrylates, methacrylates and α, β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26, 397-415.
13. Benigni, R.; Bossa, C.; Jeliazkova, N.; Netzeva, T.; Worth, A. The Benigni/Bossa Rules for Mutagenicity and CarcInogenicity-A Module of Toxtree. European Commission report EUR 23241 EN; IdeaConsult Ltd.: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2008. Avalilable online: http://toxtree.sourceforge.net/ carc.html (accessed on 3 August 2011).
14. Price, N. Hail Caesar. Chem. Ind. 2008, 15, 18-19.
15. Benfenati, E. CAESAR QSAR models for REACH. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4 (Suppl 1), S1-S5.
16. Fjodorova, N.; Vračko, M.; Novič, M.; Roncaglioni, A.; Benfenati, E. New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4 (Suppl 1), S3:1-S3:15.
17. Worth, A.P.; Bassan, A.; de Brujin, J.; Gallegos Saliner, A.; Netzeva, T.; Patlewicz, G.; Pavan, M.; Tsakovska, I.; Eisenreich, S. The role of the European chemicals bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2007, 18, 111-125.
18. OECD principles. Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(q)sar] Models; OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 69; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques /Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 30 March 2007. Available online: http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2007doc.nsf/linkto/env-jm-mono(2007)2 (accessed on 3 August 2011).
19. Putz, M.V.; Putz, A.M.; Barou, R. Spectral-SAR realization of OECD-QSAR principles. Int. J. Chem. Model. 2011, 3, 2.
20. Putz, M.V. Residual-QSAR. Implications for genotoxic carcinogenesis. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 29, doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-5-29.
21. Toplis, J.G.; Costello, J.D. Chance correlation in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 1066-1069.
22. Hansch C.; Kurup A.; Garg R.; Gao H. Chem-bioinformatics and QSAR: A review of QSAR lacking positive hydrophobic terms. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 619-672.
23. Eckert, M.; Fleischmann, G.; Jira, R.; Hermann, M.B.; Golka, K. Acetaldehyde. In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
24. Sowin, T.J.; Melcher, L.M. Acetaldehyde. In Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L., Ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
25. Alcohol Drinking. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1988. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol44/volume44.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2011).
26. Chemical summary for acetaldehyde. US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/chemfact/s_acetal.txt (accessed on 3 August 2011).
27. Chemicals in the environment: Acetaldehyde (CAS no. 75-07-0). US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/chemfact/f_acetal.txt (accessed on 3 August 2011).
28. Gold, L.S. The carcinogenic potency project. The Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011. Available online: http://potency.berkeley.edu/index.html (accessed on 3 August 2011).
29. Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Rombouts, L.J.A.; Ragas, Ad.M.J.; van de Meent, D. Human-toxicological effect and damage factors of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic chemicals for life cycle impact assessment. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2005, 1, 181-244.
30. HyperChem 7.01, Program package and documentation. Hypercube, Inc.: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2002.
31. Putz, M.V.; Lacrǎmǎ, A.M. Introducing spectral structure activity relationship (S-SAR) analysis. Application to ecotoxicology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8, 363-391.
32. Lacrǎmǎ, A.M.; Putz, M.V.; Ostafe, V. A Spectral-SAR model for the anionic-cationic interaction in ionic liquids: Application to Vibrio fischeri ecotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8, 842-863.
33. Chicu, S.A.; Putz, M.V. Köln-Timişoara molecular activity combined models toward interspecies toxicity assessment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4474-4497.
34. Putz, M.V.; Putz, A.M.; Lazea, M.; Ienciu, L.; Chiriac, A. Quantum-SAR extension of the Spectral-SAR algorithm. Application to polyphenolic anticancer bioactivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1193-1214.
35. Putz, M.V.; Putz, A.M.; Ostafe, V.; Chiriac, A. Spectral-SAR ecotoxicology of ionic liquids-acetylcholine interaction on E. Electricus species. Int. J. Chem. Model. 2010, 2, 85-96.
36. Putz, M.V. QSAR & SPECTRAL-SAR in Computational Ecotoxicology; Apple Academics: Ontario, Canada, 2011, in press.
37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Guidelines for mutagenicity risk assessment. Fed. Regist. 1986, 51, 34006-34012.
38. Koopmans, T. Uber die zuordnung von wellen funktionen und eigenwerter zu den einzelnen elektronen eines atom. Physica 1934, 1, 104-113.
39. Putz, M.V. Electronegativity and chemical hardness: Different patterns in quantum chemistry. Curr. Phys. Chem. 2011, 1, 111-139.
40. Putz, M.V. Absolute and Chemical Electronegativity and Hardness; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
41. Parr, R.G.; Donnelly, R.A.; Levy, M.; Palke, W.E. Electronegativity: The density functional viewpoint. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 3801-3808.
42. Sanderson, R.T. Principles of electronegativity. Part I. General nature. J. Chem. Educ. 1988, 65, 112-119.
43. Mortier, W.J.; Genechten, K.V.; Gasteiger, J. Electronegativity equalization: Application and parametrization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 829-835.
44. Pearson, R.G. Absolute electronegativity and absolute hardness of Lewis acids and bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6801-6806.
45. Chattaraj, P.K.; Lee, H.; Parr, R.G. Principle of maximum hardness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1854-1855.
46. Chattaraj, P.K.; Liu, G.H.; Parr, R.G. The maximum hardness principle in the Gyftpoulos-Hatsopoulos three-level model for an atomic or molecular species and its positive and negative ions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 237, 171-176.
47. Ayers, P.W.; Parr, R.G. Variational principles for describing chemical reactions: The Fukui function and chemical hardness revisited. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2010-2018.
48. Putz, M.V. Maximum hardness index of quantum acid-base bonding. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2008, 60, 845-868.
49. Franke, R.; Gruska, A. General introduction to QSAR. In Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationhsip (QSAR) Models of Mutagens and Carcinogens; Benigni, R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 1-40.
50. Putz, M.V.; Lazea, M.; Putz, A.M.; Seiman-Duda, C. Exploring Catastrophe-QSAR. Application on anti-HIV activity. Preprint 2011, Unpublished work.
51. Caspase-2 IHC Antibody. IHC WORLD, LLC: Woodstock, MD, USA, 2011. Available online: http://www.ihcworld.com/products/antibody-datasheets/Caspase2.IW-PA1113.htm (accessed on 3 August 2011).
52. Parr, R.G.; Szentpály, L.V.; Liu, S. Electrophilicity index. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922-1924.
53. Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; Roy, D.R.; Chattaraj, P.K. Electrophilicity index as a possible descriptor of biological activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5533-5543.
54. Pooja, M.; Tripathi, V.; Yadav B.S. Insilico QSAR modeling and drug development process. GERF Bull. Biosci. 2010, 1, 37-40.
55. Tarko, L.; Putz, M.V. On Quantitative Structure-Toxicity Relationships (QSTR) using high chemical diversity molecules group. Preprint 2011, Unpublished work.
56. Putz, M.V.; Putz, A.M.; Lazea, M.; Chiriac, A. Spectral vs. statistic approach of structure-activity relationship. Application on ecotoxicity of aliphatic amines. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2009, 8, 1235-1251.