Estimation methods for ranking recent information

SIGIR'11 - Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 495-504

  Efron, Miles ^a   Golovchinsky, Gene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b FX PALO ALTO LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Microblogs; Ranking algorithms; Time

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHODS; MICROBLOGS; PSEUDO RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; RANKING ALGORITHM; SPECIFIC INFORMATION; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; TIME;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 80052137217     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2009984     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Adar, E. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., and Elsas, J.L., 2009. The web changes everything: understanding the dynamics of web content. Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 282-291.
2. Bernstein, M. Suh, B., Hong, L., Chen. J., Kairam, S., and Chi, E. 2010. Eddi: Interactive Topic-Based Browsing of Social Status Streams. UIST 2010: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. (forthcoming) (2010).
3. Bolstad, W.M. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Wiley-Interscience.
4. Dai, N. and Davison, B.D. 2010. Freshness matters. Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '10 (Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), 114.
5. Dakka, W., Gravano, L., Ipeirotis, P., Answering General Time-Sensitive Queries, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 99, no. PrePrints, 2010.
6. Dong, A. Zhang, R., Kolari, P., Bai, J., Diaz, F., Chang, Y., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. 2010. Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using Twitter data. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 331-340.
7. Efron, M. 2010. Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), 787-788.
8. Efron, M. and Winget, M. 2010. Questions are content: A Taxonomy of Questions in a Microblogging Environment. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. (2010).
9. Evans, B.M. and Chi, E.H. 2008. Towards a model of understanding social search. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (San Diego, CA, USA, 2008), 485-494.
10. Golovchinsky, G. and Efron, M. 2010. Making sense of Twitter search. Proc. CHI2010 Workshop on Microblogging: What and How Can We Learn From It? April 11, 2010. (2010).
11. Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S.D. 2010. The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2010), 431-440.
12. Jones, R. and Diaz, F. 2007. Temporal profiles of queries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 25, 3 (2007), 14-es.
13. King, I., and Li, J. 2009. Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Social web search and mining. (Hong Kong, China, 2009), 70.
14. Lavrenko, V. and Croft, W.B. 2001. Relevance based language models. Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (New York, NY, USA, 2001), 120-127.
15. Li, X. and Croft, W.B. 2003. Time-based language models. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '03 (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2003), 469.
16. Morris, M.R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, Katrina. 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010), 1739-1748.
17. Pickens, J. and Golovchinsky, G. 2008. Ranked feature fusion models for ad hoc retrieval. Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 893-900.
18. Ponte, J.M. and Croft, W.B. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. SIGIR 1998: Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. (1998), 275-281.
19. Robertson, S.E. Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M., and Gatford, M. 1994. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 1994) (1994).
20. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., and Liebling, D.J. 2010. A longitudinal study of how highlighting web content change affects people's web interactions. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10 (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010), 1353.
21. Twitter. http://twitter.com. Accessed: 12-02-2010.
22. Voorhees, E.M. 2007. TREC: Continuing information retrieval's tradition of experimentation. Commun. ACM. 50, (Nov. 2007), 51-54. (Pubitemid 350083512)
23. Yang, J. and Leskovec, J. 2011. Temporal variation in online media. ACM Internation Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '11) (2011).
24. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. 2001. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. CIKM 2001: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management. (2001), 403-410. (Pubitemid 34974657)
25. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. 2004. A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Information Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 2, 2 (2004), 179-214.
26. Zhai, C. 2008. Statistical Language Models for Information Retrieval A Critical Review. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, (Mar. 2008), 137-213.