An investigation of decompounding for cross-language patent search

SIGIR'11 - Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1169-1170

  Leveling, Johannes ^a   Magdy, Walid ^a   Jones, Gareth J F ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Decompounding; Patent retrieval

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LINGUISTICS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

CROSS LANGUAGES; DECOMPOUNDING; MACHINE TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; PARALLEL CORPORA; PATENT RETRIEVAL; PATENT SEARCH; SMALL TRAINING; TRANSLATION METHOD;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 80052129490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2010103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. M. Braschler and B. Ripplinger. How effective is stemming and decompounding for German text retrieval? Inf. Retr., 7(3-4):291-316, 2004. (Pubitemid 39046500)
2. A. Chen and F. C. Gey. Multilingual information retrieval using machine translation, relevance feedback and decompounding. Inf. Retr., 7(1-2):149-182, 2004. (Pubitemid 39046512)
3. C. Jochim, H. Lioma, H. Schütze, S. Koch, and T. Ertl. Preliminary study into query translation for patent retrieval. In PaIR '10, Toronto, Canada, 2010.
4. P. Koehn and K. Knight. Empirical methods for compound splitting. In EACL '03, pages 187-193, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2003. ACL.
5. W. Magdy and G. J. F. Jones. PRES: a score metric for evaluating recall-oriented information retrieval applications. In SIGIR 2010, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
6. C. Monz and M. de Rijke. Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual information retrieval for Dutch, German, and Italian. In CLEF '01, pages 262-277. Springer, 2002.
7. F. Piroi. CLEF-IP 2010: Retrieval experiments in the intellectual property domain. In CLEF 2010, Padua, Italy, 2010.