F18-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrent or persistent locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Revista de Investigacion Clinica

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 227-235

  Cetina, Lucely ^a   Serrano, Alberto ^a   Cantú de León, David ^a   Pérez Montiel, Delia ^a   Estrada, Enrique ^a   Coronel, Jaime ^a   Hernández Lucio, Martha ^b   Dueñas González, Alfonso ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CANCEROLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET CT); Recurrence

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE COURSE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; LUNG; MEDIASTINUM LYMPH NODE; OBTURATOR NERVE; PELVIS; PREDICTION; RETROPERITONEUM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; VAGINA;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 80052128417     PISSN: 00348376     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57(1): 43-66.
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2002. Available from: www-dep.iarc.fr/
3. Registro Histopatológico de Neoplasias Malignas. Compendio de mortalidad/morbilidad 2003. Secretaría de Salud (SSa). México. Disponible en: www.dgepi.salud.gob.mx/diveent/DIVEENT-INDEX.htm
4. Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, Seo JJ, Park JG. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2003; 23: 969-80. (Pubitemid 37414772)
5. Kesic V. Management of cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32: 832-7. (Pubitemid 44469296)
6. Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 6th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 95 (Suppl. 1): S43-S103.
7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology v. 1.2009. Available from: www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician-gls/PDF/cervical/pdf
8. Park DH, Kim KH, Park SY, Lee BH, Choi CW, Chin SY. Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer: computed tomography versus positron emission tomography. Korean J Radiol 2000; 1: 51-5.
9. Magné N, Chargari C, Vicenzi L, Gillon N, Messai T, Magné J, et al. New trends in the evaluation and treatment of cervical cancer: the role of FDG-PET. Cancer Treat Rev 2008; 34: 671-81.
10. Lai CH, Yen TC, Chang TC. Positron emission tomography imaging for gynecologic malignancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 37-41.
11. Bomanji JB, Costa DC, Eli PJ. Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2001; 3: 157-64. (Pubitemid 33585927)
12. Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Beguin Y, Fillet G. PET scan imaging in oncology. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1525-34.
13. 18F-FDG uptake in the squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix is correlated with glucose transporter 1 expression. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 22-9.
14. Chung HH, Kim SK, Kim TH, Lee S, Kang KW, Kim JY, Park SY. Clinical impact of FDG-PET imaging in post-therapy surveillance of uterine-cervical cancer: from diagnosis to prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103: 165-70. (Pubitemid 44374686)
15. Sakurai H, Suzuki Y, Nonaka T, Ishikawa H, Shioya M, Kiyohara H, et al. FDG-PET in the detection of recurrence of uterine cervical carcinoma following radiation therapy-tumor volume and FDG uptake value. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100: 601-7. (Pubitemid 43246878)
16. Unger JB, Ivy JJ, Connor P, Charrier A, Ramaswamy RR, Ampil FL, Monsour RP. Detection of recurrent cervical cancer by whole-body FDG-PET scan in asymptomatic and symptomatic women. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94: 212-6. (Pubitemid 38950523)
17. Havrilesky LJ, Wong TZ, Álvarez-Secord A, Berchuk A, Clarke-Pearson DL, Jones EL. The role of PET scanning in the detection of recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 186-90.
18. Ryu SY, Kim MH, Choi SC, Choi CW, Lee KH. Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 347-52.
19. Yildirim Y, Sehirali S, Avci ME, Yilmaz C, Ertopcu K, Tinar S, et al. Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108: 154-9. (Pubitemid 350299438)
20. Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, Perego P, Moreni R, Pellegrino A, et al. Lymph-node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG-PET/CT. Radiology 2006; 238: 272-9. (Pubitemid 43010605)
21. Chung HH, Jo H, Kang WJ, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, et al. Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104: 529-34. (Pubitemid 46240239)
22. Hricak H, Yu KK. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1101-8. (Pubitemid 26376214)
23. Amit A, Beck D, Lowenstein L, Lavie O, Bar Shalom R, Kedar Z, Israel O. The role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100: 65-9. (Pubitemid 41815051)
24. Sugawara Y, Eisbruch A, Kosuda S, Recker BE, Kison PV, Wahl RL. Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 1125-31. (Pubitemid 29315502)
25. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2040-7.
26. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Monta S, et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis in recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2009; 36: 362-72.
27. Wong TZ, Jones EL, Coleman RE. Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose for evaluating local and distant disease in patients with cervical cancer. Mol Imag Biol 2004; 6: 55-62. (Pubitemid 38240359)
28. Chang TC, Law KS, Hong JH, Lai CH, Ng KK, Hsueh S, et al. Positron emission tomography for unexplained elevation of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels during follow-up for patients with cervical malignancies: a phase II study. Cancer 2004; 101: 164-71. (Pubitemid 38812436)
29. Sun SS, Chen TC, Yen RF, Shen YY, Changlai SP, Kao A. Value of whole body 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent cervical cancer. Anticancer Res 2001; 21: 2957-61. (Pubitemid 33051158)
30. 18F-FDG PET for recurrent cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 1632-9. (Pubitemid 47618468)
31. Yen TC, Lai CH, Ma SY, Huang KG, Huang HJ, Hong JH, et al. Comparative benefits and limitations of 18F-FDG-PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33: 1399-407.
32. Lai CH, Huang KG, See LC, Yen TZ, Tsai CS, Chang TC, et al. Restaging recurrent cervical carcinoma with dual-phase [18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Cancer 2004; 100: 544-52.
33. Lin CT, Yen TC, Chang TC, Ng KK, Tsai CS, Ho KC, Lai CH. Role of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in re-recurrent cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 1994-2003.
34. Husain A, Akhurst T, Larson S, Alektiar K, Barakat RR, Chi DS. A prospective study of the accuracy of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) in identifying sites of metastasis prior to pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106: 177-80. (Pubitemid 46898590)
35. Bodurka-Bavers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Bevers MW, Lucas KR, Wharton JT. Post-therapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcome analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78: 187-93. (Pubitemid 30650352)
36. Zola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Piovano E, Perotto S, Gadducci A, et al. Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107(Suppl.): S150-S154. (Pubitemid 47496063)
37. Soisson AP, Geszler G, Soper JT, Berchuk A, Clarke-Pearson DL. A comparison of symptomatology, physical examination, and vaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent carcinoma after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 106-9. (Pubitemid 20205229)
38. Brooks RA, Rader JS, Dehdashti F, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Thaker PH, et al. Surveillance FDG-PET detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 104-9.
39. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Posttherapy [18F] flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2167-71. (Pubitemid 41095151)