Introduction of organised mammography screening in Tyrol: Results following first year of complete rollout

BMC Public Health

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Oberaigner, Willi ^a,b,c   Daniaux, Martin ^d   Geiger Gritsch, Sabine ^a   Knapp, Rudolf ^e   Siebert, Uwe ^b,c,f,g   Buchberger, Wolfgang ^a,b  

^a Tyrolean State Hospitals Ltd   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c Oncotyrol Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine   (Austria)

^d INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^e Kufstein County Hospital   (Austria)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^g MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRIA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 80052126754     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-673     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boyle P, Levin B, Eds, World Cancer Report 2008 Lyon: IARC Press 2008
2. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 D001877
3. Introduction of organised mammography screening in tyrol: results of a one-year pilot phase. Oberaigner W, Buchberger W, Frede T, Daniaux M, Knapp R, Marth C, Siebert U, BMC Public Health 2011 11 91 99 10.1186/1471-2458-11-91 21306614
4. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, (Eds.), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2006
5. Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G, Ponti A, Malila N, Arbyn M, Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening. First Report Brussels: European Commission 2008
6. Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. Dowling EC, Klabunde C, Patnick J, Ballard-Barbash R, J Med Screen 2010 17 139 146 10.1258/jms.2010.010033 20956724
7. Eusoma-Breast Unit-Certification Process. http://www.eusoma.org/Engx/ BreastUnits/AccreditationProcess.aspx?cont=ap-accredited accessed 09.05.2011
8. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 College Station, Tx, StataCorp LP 2009
9. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involvin human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/ 10policies/b3/index.html (acessed 7 November 2009)
10. Evaluationsbericht 2005-2007. Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening- Programms in Deutschland. Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie, (Ed.), Köln 2009
11. Effectiveness of organised versus opportunistic mammography screening. Bulliard JL, Ducros C, Jemelin C, Arzel B, Fioretta G, Levi F, Ann Oncol 2009 20 1199 1202 10.1093/annonc/mdn770 19282467
12. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes: 1998-2008. Giordano L, Giorgi D, Ventura L, Stefanini V, Senore C, Castagno R, Paci E, Segnan N, Epidemiol Prev 2010 34 27 34 21220835
13. Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM, J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100 1082 1091 10.1093/jnci/djn224 18664650
14. Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality. Blanks RG, Moss SM, McGahan CE, Quinn MJ, Babb PJ, BMJ 2000 321 665 669 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665 10987769
15. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K, JAMA 2003 290 2129 2137 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129 14570948 (Pubitemid 37432973)
16. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Interval breast cancers at 1year follow-up. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M, Ferrari A, Speziani M, Bellarosa S, Remida G, Gasparotti C, Galligioni E, Ciatto S, Eur J Cancer 2011 47 1021 1026 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.002 21211962
17. Double reading of radiological examinations in Norway. Husby JA, Espeland A, Kalyanpur A, Brocker C, Haldorsen IS, Acta Radiol 2011
18. Are survival rates for Tyrol published in the Eurocare studies biased? Oberaigner W, Siebert U, Acta Oncol 2009 1 8
19. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, et al. Radiology 2011 259 72 84 10.1148/radiol.10101698 21343539