PLM to support hazard identification in chemical plant design

Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 349-362

  Giannini, F ^a,b,c   Monti, M ^a,b,c   Ansaldi, S ^a,b,c   Bragatto, P ^a,b,c  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b CAD   (Italy)

^c ISPESL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hazard identification; Plant design; Product lifecycle management

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL HAZARDS; CHEMICAL PLANTS; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DESIGN;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; DOCUMENTATION ANALYSIS; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; HIGH COSTS; PLANT DESIGNS; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 80052116285     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4617-0_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Heikkila, A.M., 1999, Inherently Safety in Process Plant Design - An Index-based Ap proach, VTT Publications 384, PhD1999, ISBN 951-38-5372-1 http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/1999/P384.pdf
2. Hendershot, D.C., Post, R.L., 2000, Inherent Safety and Reliability in Plant Design. Proc. of Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, 2000 Annual Symposium: Beyond Regulatory Compliance, Making Safety Second Nature, Texas, October 2000
3. Hendershot, D.C., 1995. Some Thoughts on the Difference Between Inherent Safety and Safety. Process Safety Progress 14, October 1995
4. Kletz, T.A., 1992b, Inherently safer design - a review. 7th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, SRP Partners, Rome, Vol. I, pp 1-13
5. Inherent Safety Approach - http://process-safety.tamu.edu
6. INSIDE Project, "The INSET toolkit" http://www.aeat-safety- andrsk,com/html/inset.html
7. Hendershot, D.C., 2002. A Check List for Inherently Safer Chemical Reaction Process Design Workshop on Risk and Reliability. Proc. of International Conference and Workshop on Risk and Reliability, Center for Chemical process Safety, October 2002
8. rd ed. Rugby: IChemE.
9. Zwetsloot, G.I.J.M., Ashford, N.A., Perspectives for combining cleaner production with inherently safer production in industrial firms, UNEP IE, Nov. 2001
10. Howat, C. S., - Process Hazard Identification Using Hazard and Operability Studies - University of Kansas, 2002,lecture notes, http://www.engr.ukans.edu/~ktl/
11. Chung, P.W.H., Yang, S., HAZARD analysis and support tool for computer controlled processes, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, November 1998
12. Chung, P.W.H., McCoy, S.A., 2001. Trial of the "HAZID" tool for computer-based HAZOP emulation on the medium-sized industrial plant, HAZARDS XVI, IChemE Symposium Series No. 148, Manchester, UK, 2001, pp. 391-404, ISBN 0-85295-441.
13. Palmer, C., Chung, P.W.H., 1999. Verifying Signed Directed Graph Models for Process Plants, Computers and Chemical Engineering Supplement, Elsevier Science Ltd.
14. Palmer, C., Chung, P.W.H., 2001. Verification of process plant models - Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI Symposium on Model-Based Validation of Intelligence, Stanford, 2001, AAAI Press
15. V. Venkatasubramanian, J. Zhao, S. Viswanathan. Intelligent system for HAZOP analysis of complex plants. Computer and Chemical Engineering 24 (2000) pp. 2291-2302, Elsevier Science Ltd.
16. Ansaldi, S., Bragatto, P., Giannini, F., Ludovisi, G., Monti, M., 2003, Criteri di sicurezza intrinseca per la progettazione di impianti di processo attraverso strumenti CAD, CAE e PDM, Convegno Scientifico Nazionale "Sicurezza nei sistemi complessi", Atti del Convegno, Bari, October 2003
17. Lees, F.P., 1980. Loss prevention in the Process Industries - volume 1, Butterworths