Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1681-1691

  Ciotola, Richard J ^a   Lansing, Stephanie ^b   Martin, Jay F ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Costa Rica; Manure; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS PRODUCTION; COSTA RICA; ELECTRICAL GENERATION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMERGY ANALYSIS; EMERGY YIELD RATIO; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL LOADING RATIO; HUMAN LABOR; LIVESTOCK MANURE; PLUG-FLOW ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS; RECYCLED ENERGY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RENEWABLE SOURCES; SUSTAINABILITY INDEX; SUSTAINABLE PROCESS;

AGRICULTURE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOGAS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LEAD ACID BATTERIES; MACHINERY; MANURES; SOLAR ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ELECTRIC GENERATORS;

BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; EMERGY; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COSTA RICA;

EID: 80052088741     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.031     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson E., Pringle C., Rojas M. Transforming tropical rivers: an environmental perspective on hydropower development in Costa Rica. Aquat. Conserv. 2006, 16(7):679-693.
2. Archer D.B., Kirsop B.H. The microbiology and control of anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic Digestion: A Waste Treatment Technology. Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry 1990, 43-91. Elsevier Applied Science, cop., London. W. Andrew (Ed.).
3. Bastianoni S., Campbell D., Susani L., Tiezzi E. The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas. Ecol. Model. 2005, 186:212-220.
4. Bastianoni S., Marchettini N. The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by emergy analysis. Ecol. Model. 2000, 129:187-193.
5. Bargigli S., Raugei M., Ulgiati S. Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes. Energy 2004, 29:2145-2159.
6. Bentley R.W. Global oil & gas depletion: an overview. Energy Policy 2002, 30(3):189-205.
7. Brown M.T. A picture is worth a thousand words: energy systems language and simulation. Ecol. Model. 2004, 178:83-100.
8. Brown M.T., Mclanahan T.R. Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals. Ecol. Model. 1996, 91:105-130.
9. Buenfil, A.A., 2001. Emergy evaluation of water. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.
10. Buranakarn, V., 1998. Evaluation of recycling and reuse of building materials using the emergy analysis method. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.
11. Cao K., Feng X. Distribution of emergy indices and its application. Energy Fuels 2007, 21:1717-1723.
12. Cavalett O., Ortega E. Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18:55-70.
13. Chen Y., Yang G., Sweeny S., Feng Y. Household biogas use in rural China: a study of opportunities and constraints. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2010, 14:545-549.
14. Gerardi M.H. The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters 2003, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
15. Giampietro M., Ulgiati S. Integrated assessment of large-scale biofuel production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2005, 24:365-384.
16. Guillen-Trujillo, H.A., 1998. Sustainability of ecotourism and traditional agricultural practices in Chiapas, Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.
17. Hall C.A.S., Powers R., Schoenberg W. Peak oil, EROI, investments and the economy in an uncertain future. Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Sources: Benefits and Risk 2008, 109-124. Springer. D. Pimentel (Ed.).
18. Ishikawa S., Hoshiba S., Hinata T., Hishinuma T., Morita S. Evaluation of a biogas plant from a life cycle assessment (LCA). Int. Cong. Series 2006, 1293:230-233.
19. Jeong C., Kim T., Lee K., Song S., Chun K.M. Generating efficiency and emissions of a spark-ignition gas generator fuelled with biogas-hydrogen blends. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34(23):9620-9627.
20. Kalaf D.M. Emergy analysis of organic and conventional hot pepper under the greenhouses. Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. Proc. 2007, 8:1957-1967.
21. Lansing S., Botero R.B., Martin J.F. Waste treatment and biogas quality in small-scale agricultural digesters. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(13):5881-5890.
22. Lansing S., Víquez J., Martínez H., Botero R., Martin J. Quantifying electricity generation and waste transformations in a low-cost, plug-flow anaerobic digestion system. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 34:332-348.
23. Lansing S., Martin J.F., Botero R.B., Nogueira T., Dias da Silva E. Methane production in low-cost, unheated, plug-flow digesters treating swine manure and used cooking grease. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4362-4370.
24. Martin J.F., Diemont S.A.W., Powell E., Stanton M., Levy-Thacher S. Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales of management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115:128-140.
25. Odum H.T. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science 1998, 242(4882):1132-1139.
26. Odum H.T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making 1996, Wiley, New York.
27. Omer A.M. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2008, 12:2265-2300.
28. Panzieri M., Marchetinni N., Bastianoni S. A thermodynamic methodology to assess how different cultivation methods affect sustainability of agricultural systems. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2002, 9:1-8.
29. Paoli C., Vassallo P., Fabiano M. Solar power: An approach to transformity evaluation. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 34:191-206.
30. Pereira C.L.F., Ortega E. Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18:77-82.
31. Powers W.J., Van Horn H.N., Wilkie A.C., Wilcox C.J., Nordstedt R.A. Effects of anaerobic digestion and additives to effluent or cattle feed on odor and odorant concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77:1412-1421.
32. Rydberg T., Jansén J. Comparison of horse and tractor traction using emergy analysis. Ecol. Eng. 2002, 19:13-28.
33. Tilley D.R. Historical solar emergy use in the United States and its relation to technological development. Emergy Synthesis 3: Theory and applications of the emergy methodology 2005, Center for Environmental Policy, Gainesville, FL. M.T. Brown, D. Campbell, V. Comar, S.L. Huang, D.R. Rydberg, D.R. Tilley, S. Uligiati (Eds.).
34. Ulgiati S., Brown M.T. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 1998, 108:23-36.
35. USEPA, 2004. In: Roos, K.F., Martin, Jr., J.H., Moser, M.A. (Eds.), AgSTAR Handbook: A manual for Developing Biogas Systems at Commercial Farms in the United States. 2nd ed., EPA 430-B0-97-015.
36. Wei X.M., Chen B., Qu Y.H., Lin C., Chen G.Q. Emergy analysis of 'four in one' peach production system in Beijing. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 2009, 14:946-958.
37. Xi Y., Qin P. Emergy evaluation of organic rice-duck mutualism system. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35:1677-1683.
38. Zhou S.Y., Zhang B., Cai Z.F. Emergy analysis of a farm biogas project in China: A biophysical perspective of agricultural ecological engineering. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 2010, 15(5):1408-1418.