Provider and partner interactions in the treatment decision-making process for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer

BJU International

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 851-856

  Zeliadt, Steven B ^a,b,c   Penson, David F ^d   Moinpour, Carol M ^c   Blough, David K ^b,c   Fedorenko, Catherine R ^c   Hall, Ingrid J ^e   Smith, Judith Lee ^e   Ekwueme, Donatus U ^e   Thompson, Ian M ^f   Keane, Thomas E ^g   Ramsey, Scott D ^b,c  

^a Affairs Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^g MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

family member involvement; patient provider communication; prostate cancer; provider partner communication; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOTIVATION; PARTNER SATISFACTION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SATISFACTION; SHARED DECISION MAKING; SPOUSE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPOUSES;

EID: 80052086156     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09945.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Heyman EN, Rosner TT,. Prostate cancer: an intimate view from patients and wives. Urol Nurs 1996; 16: 37-44
2. Feltwell AK, Rees CE,. The information-seeking behaviours of partners of men with prostate cancer: a qualitative pilot study. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 179-85 (Pubitemid 39044529)
3. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Gleave ME, Degner LF,. Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30: 107-14
4. Echlin KN, Rees CE,. Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of men with prostate cancer and their partners: a review of the literature. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 35-41 (Pubitemid 34101405)
5. O'Rourke ME, Germino BB,. Prostate cancer treatment decisions: a focus group exploration. Oncol Nurs Forum 1998; 25: 97-104
6. Boehmer U, Clark JA,. Married couples' perspectives on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making. Psychooncology 2001; 10: 147-55
7. Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R,. From 'death sentence' to 'good cancer': couples' transformation of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Nurs Res 2002; 51: 391-7
8. Resendes LA, McCorkle R,. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Invest 2006; 24: 192-8
9. Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Klotz L,. Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract 1999; 7: 130-5 (Pubitemid 29237285)
10. Davison BJ, Gleave ME, Goldenberg SL, Degner LF, Hoffart D, Berkowitz J,. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 42-9 (Pubitemid 34101406)
11. Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C,. Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 91-6
12. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, et al,. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 5-22 (Pubitemid 32335484)
13. Entwistle VA, Watt IS,. Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 268-78 (Pubitemid 44511878)
14. Zeliadt SB, Ramsey SD, Penson DF, et al,. Why do men choose one treatment over another?: a review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2006; 106: 1865-74 (Pubitemid 43673200)
15. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Herxheimer A, McPherson A, Shepperd S, Miller R,. Is 'watchful waiting' a real choice for men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study. BJU Int 2002; 90: 257-64 (Pubitemid 34989073)
16. O'Rourke ME,. Narrowing the options: the process of deciding on prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Invest 1999; 17: 349-59 (Pubitemid 29266708)
17. Srirangam SJ, Pearson E, Grose C, Brown SC, Collins GN, O'Reilly PH,. Partner's influence on patient preference for treatment in early prostate cancer. BJU Int 2003; 92: 365-9 (Pubitemid 37100509)
18. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD,. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-33 (Pubitemid 126433231)
19. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al,. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 969-74 (Pubitemid 28445094)
20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S,. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1989
21. Cox J, Amling CL,. Current decision-making in prostate cancer therapy. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 275-8 (Pubitemid 351489378)