A feedback intervention to increase digital and paper checklist performance in technically advanced aircraft simulation

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 145-150

  Rantz, William G ^a   Van Houten, Ron ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

checklist use; feedback; flight simulators; flight training; paper versus electronic checklists; rule governed behavior; simulator use

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AVIATION; CHECKLIST; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AVIATION; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; CHECKLIST; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80052067419     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: 19383703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-145     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Arkell, D., (2006). From safe to safer: Boeing's electronic checklist marks 10 years of enhanced safety for pilots and travelers. Boeing Frontiers, 4 (11). Retrieved from http:www.boeing.comnewsfrontiersarchive2006aprilica3.html.
2. Boorman, D., (2001a). Safety benefits of electronic checklists: An analysis of commercial transport accidents. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1-6). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
3. Boorman, D., (2001b). Today's electronic checklists reduce likelihood of crew errors and help prevent mishaps. ICAO Journal, 1, 17-21.
4. Degani, A., (1992). On the typography of flight-deck documentation (NASA Contractor Rep. 177605). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
5. Degani, A., (2002, April). Pilot error in the 90s: Still alive and kicking. Paper presented at the meeting of the Flight Safety Foundation of the National Business Aviation Association, Cincinnati, OH.
6. Degani, A., &, Wiener, E. L., (1990). Human factors of flight-deck checklists: The normal checklist (NASA Contractor Rep. 177549). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
7. Degani, A., &, Wiener, E. L., (1993). Cockpit checklists: Concepts, design, and use. Human Factors, 35 (2), 28-43.
8. Diez, M., Boehm-Davis, D., &, Holt, R., (2003). Checklist performance on the commercial flight-deck. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 323-328). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
9. Pilot's Checklist Cirrus SR20. (2002). P/N 11935-003. Duluth, MN: Cirrus Design Corporation.
10. Rantz, W. G., Dickinson, A. M., Sinclair, G. A., &, Van Houten, R., (2009). The effect of feedback on the accuracy of checklist completion during instrument flight training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 497-509.