Effects of environmental conditions associated to the cardinal orientation on the reproductive phenology of the cerrado savanna tree Xylopia aromatica (Annonaceae)

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1007-1019

  Camargo, Maria Gabriela Gutierrez ^a   Souza, Regina M ^a   Reys, Paula ^a   Morellato, Leonor P C ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cerrado savanna; Edge effect; Fragmentation; Reproductive phenology; Synchrony

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEASON; TREE; XYLOPIA;

BRAZIL; PERIODICITY; REPRODUCTION; SEASONS; TREES; XYLOPIA;

ANNONACEAE; XYLOPIA AROMATICA;

EID: 80052056194     PISSN: 00013765     EISSN: 16782690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652011005000014     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alberti LF and Morellato LPC. 2008. Influência da abertura de trilhas antrópicas e clareiras naturais na fenologia reprodutiva de Gymnanthes concolor (Spreng.) Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae). Rev Bras Bot 31: 53-59.
2. Almeida SP, Proença CEB, Sano SM and Ribeiro JF. 1998. Cerrado: espécies vegetais úteis. Planaltina: Embrapa, 464 p.
3. Augspurger CK. 1983. Phenology, flowering synchrony and fruit set of six neotropical shrubs. Biotropica 15: 257-267.
4. Barros MAG. 2002. Floração sincrônica e sistemas reprodutivos em quatro espécies de Kielmeyera Mart. (Guttiferae). Acta Bot Bras 16: 113-122.
5. Batalha MA, Aragaki S and Mantovani W. 1997. Variações fenológicas das espécies do cerrado em Emas (Pirassununga, SP). Acta Bot Bras 11: 61-78.
6. Batalha ma and mantovani W. 2000. Reproductive phenological patterns of cerrado plant species at the Pé-de-Gigante Reserve (Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP, Brazil): a comparison between the herbaceous and woody floras. Rev Bras Biol 60: 129-145.
7. Batalha MA and Martins FR. 2004. Reproductive phenology of the cerrado plant community in Emas National Park (central Brazil). Aust J Bot 52: 149-161.
8. Bolmgren K. 1998. The use of synchronization measures in studies of plant reproductive phenology. Oikos 82: 411-415.
9. Cazetta E, Schaefer HM and Galetti M. 2009. Why are fruits colorful? The relative importance of achromatic and chromatic contrasts for detection by birds. Evol Ecol 23: 233-244.
10. Coutinho LM. 1978. O conceito de cerrado. Rev Bras Bot 1: 17-23.
11. Coutinho LM. 2006. O conceito de bioma. Acta Bot Bras 20: 13-23.
12. Durigan G, Baitelo JB, Franco GADC and Siqueira MF. 2004. Plantas do cerrado paulista: Imagens de uma paisagem ameaçada, Instituto Florestal, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo: Páginas e Letras Editora e Gráfica, 475 p.
13. Durigan G, Siqueira MF and Franco GADC. 2007. Threats to the Cerrado remnants of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Agric 64: 366-363.
14. Felfili JM, Silva-Junior MC, Dias BJ and Rezende AV. 1999. Estudo fenológico de Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) Coville no cerrado sensu stricto da Fazenda Água Limpa no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Rev Bras Bot 22: 83-90.
15. Fitter AH and Fitter RSR. 2002. Rapid Changes in Flowering Time in British Plants. Science 296: 1689-1691.
16. Freitas L and Bolmgren K. 2008. Synchrony is more than overlap: measuring phenological synchronization considering time length and intensity. Rev Bras Bot 31: 721-724.
17. Furley PA. 1999. The Nature and Diversity of Neotropical Savanna Vegetation with Particular Reference to the Brazilian cerrados. Global Ecol Biogeogr 8: 223-241.
18. Gottsberger G and Silberbauer-Gottsberger I. 2006. Life in the Cerrado: A South American Tropical Seasonal Ecosystem, Pollination and Seed Dispersal, Ulm: Reta Verlag, 383 p.
19. Goulart MF, Lemos JP and Lovato MB. 2005. Phenological variation within and among populations of Plathymenia reticulata in Brazilian Cerrado, the Atlantic Forest and transitional sites. Ann Bot 96: 445-455.
20. Herrera cm. 1988. The Fruiting Ecology of Osyris quadripartita: Individual Variation and Evolutionary Potential. Ecology 69: 233-249.
21. Kapos V, Wandelli E, Camargo JL and Ganade G. 1997. Edge-related changes in environmental and plant responses due to forest fragmentation in Central Amazonia. In: Laurance WF and Bierregaard RO (Eds), Tropical forest remnants, Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 33-44.
22. Klink CA and Machado RB. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conserv Biol 19: 707-713.
23. Köeppen W. 1948. Climatologia, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 479 p.
24. Koptur S, Haber WA, Frankie GW and Baker HG. 1988. Phenological studies of shrub and treelet species in tropical cloud forests of Costa-Rica. J Trop Ecol 4: 323-346.
25. Kovach GLD. 2010. Oriana for Windows version 3.0 Kovach Computer Services, Wales: Pentraeth. http://www.kovcomp.co.uk. Cited 10 January 2010.
26. Kronka et al. 1998. Áreas de Domínio do cerrado no Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 84 p.
27. Landenberger RE and Ostergren DA. 2002. Eupatorium rugosum (Asteraceae) flowering as an indicator of edge effect from clearcutting in mixed-mesophytic forest. For Ecol Manage 155: 55-68.
28. Lenza E and Klink CA. 2006. Comportamento fenológico de espécies lenhosas em um cerrado sentido restrito de Brasilia, DF. Rev Bras Bot 29: 627-638.
29. Lorenzi R. 1992. Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. Nova Odessa: Plantarum, 384 p.
30. Mantovani W and martins FR. 1988. Variações fenológicas das espécies do cerrado da Reserva Biológica de Mogi-Guaçu, Estado de São Paulo. Rev Bras Bot 11: 101-112.
31. Marquis RJ. 1988. Phenological variation in the neotropical understory shrub Piper arielanum: causes and consequences. Ecology 69: 1552-1565.
32. Morellato LP and Leitao-Filho HF. 1990. Estratégias fenológicas de espécies arbóreas em floresta mesófila na Serra do Japi, Jundiaí, São Paulo. Rev Bras Biol 50: 163-173.
33. Morellato LPC. 2004. Phenology, sex ratio, and spatial distribution among dioecious species of Trichilia (Meliaceae). Plant Biol 6: 491-497.
34. Morellato LPC, Alberti LF and Hudson IL. 2010. Applications of circular statistics in plant phenology: a case studies approach. In: Hudson IL and Keatley M (Eds), Phenological Research: Methods for Environmental and Climate Change Analysis, Netherlands: Springer, p. 357-371.
35. Morellato LPC, Talora DC, Takahasi A, Bencke CC, Romera EC and Zipparro VB. 2000. Phenology of Atlantic rain forest trees: a comparative study. Biotropica 32: 811-823.
36. Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 58-62.
37. Newstrom LE, Frankie GW and Baker HG. 1994. A new classification for plant phenology based on flowering patterns in lowland tropical forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica. Biotropica 26: 141-159.
38. Oliveira MIB and Sigrist MR. 2008. Fenologia reprodutiva, polinização e reprodução de Dipteryx alata Vogel (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Bot 31: 195-207.
39. Oliveira PE. 2008. Fenologia e biologia reprodutiva das espécies de cerrado. In: Sano SM, Almeida SP and Ribeiro JF (Eds), Cerrado: ecologia e flora, Brasilia: Embrapa, p. 273-290.
40. Oliveira PE and Gibbs PE. 2000. Reproductive biology of woody plants in a cerrado community of Central Brazil. Flora 195: 311-329.
41. Opler PA, Frankie GW and Baker HG. 1976. Rainfall as a factor in the release, timing, and synchronization of anthesis by tropical trees and shrubs. J Biogeogr 3: 231-236.
42. Pivello VR, Shida CN and Meirelles ST. 1999. Alien grasses in Brazilian savannas: a threat to the biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 8: 1281-1294.
43. Restrepo C, Gomez N and Heredia S. 1999. Anthropogenic edges, treefall gaps, and fruit-frugivore interactions in a Neotropical Montane Forest. Ecology 80: 668-685.
44. Rivera G, Elliott S, Caldas LS, Nicolossi G, Coradin VTR and Borchert R. 2002. Increasing day length induces spring flushing of tropical dry forest trees in the absence of rain. Trees Struct Funct 16: 445-456.
45. San Martin-Gajardo I and Morellato LPC. 2003. inter and intraspecific variation on reproductive phenology of the Brazilian Atlantic forest Rubiaceae: ecology and phylogenetic constraints. Rev Biol Trop 51: 691-698.
46. Schaefer HM, Levey DJ, Schaefer V and Avery ML. 2006. The role of chromatic and achromatic signals for fruit detection by birds. Behav Ecol 17: 784-789.
47. Schwartz MD. 2003. Phenology: an integrative environmental science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 592 p.
48. Silva JF, Fariñas MR, Felfili JM and Klink CA. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the cerrado region of Brazil. J Biogeogr 33: 236-548.
49. Turton SM and Freiburger HJ. 1997. Edge and aspect effects in the microclimate of a small Tropical Forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, Northeastern Australia. In: Laurance WF and Bierregaard RO (Eds), Tropical forest remnants, Chicago: Chicago university Press, p. 33-44.
50. Vilela GF, Carvalho D and Vieira fa. 2008. Fenologia de Caryocar brasiliense Camb. (Caryocariaceae) no Alto Rio Grande, sul de Minas Gerais. Cerne 14: 317-329.
51. Wales BA. 1972. Vegetation analysis of north and south edges in a mature oak-hickory forest. Ecol Monogr 42: 451-471.
52. Wheelwright NT. 1985. Competition for dispersers, and the timing of flowering and fruiting in a guild of tropical trees. Oikos 44: 465-477.
53. Willson MF and Thompson JN. 1982. Phenology and ecology of color in bird-dispersed fruits, or why some fruits are red when they are "green". Can J Bot 60: 701-713.
54. Wright SJ and Van Schaik CP. 1994. Light and the phenology of tropical trees. Am Nat 143: 192-199.
55. Zar HJ. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 663 p.