An approach to defining stock complexes for U.S. west coast groundfishes using vulnerabilities and ecological distributions

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 589-604

  Cope, Jason M ^a   Devore, John ^b   Dick, E J ^c   Ames, Kelly ^b   Budrick, John ^d   Erickson, Daniel L ^e   Grebel, Joanna ^d   Hanshew, Gretchen ^f   Jones, Robert ^g   Mattes, Lynn ^e   Niles, Corey ^h   Williams, Sarah ^f  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b Pacific Fishery Management Council   (United States)

^c SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^e OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^f NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^g Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COASTAL ZONE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; FISH; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; LATITUDE; LIFE HISTORY; OVERFISHING; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RISK FACTOR; STOCK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 80052048488     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2011.591264     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berkeley, S. A., M. A. Hixon, R. J. Larson, and M. S. Love. 2004. Fisheries sustainability via protection of age structure and spatial distribution of fish populations. Fisheries 29(8):23-32.
2. Cailliet, G. M., E. J. Burton, J. M. Cope, and L. A. Kerr. 2000. Biological characteristics of nearshore fishes of California: a review of existing knowledge and proposed additional studies for the Pacific Ocean interjurisdictional fisheries management plan coordination and development. Available: www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/lifehistories/index.asp. (September 2010).
3. Cope, J. M., and A. E. Punt. 2009. Drawing the lines: resolving fishery management units with simple fisheries data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries andAquatic Sciences 66:1256-1273.
4. Dick, E. J., and A. D. MacCall. 2010. Estimates of sustainable yield for 50 data-poor stocks in the Pacific coast groundfish fishery management plan. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-460.
5. Essington, T. E., A. H. Beaudreau, and J. Wiedenmann. 2006. Fishing through marine food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103:3171-3175.
6. Field, J., J. Cope, and M. Key. 2010. A descriptive example of applying vulnerability evaluation criteria to California nearshore finfish species. Pages 229-240 in R. Starr, C. Culver, C. Pomeroy, S. McMillan, T. Barnes, and D. Aseltine-Neilsen, editors. Managing data-poor fisheries: case studies, models and solutions 1. University of California-San Diego, California Sea GrantProgram, La Jolla.
7. Hanna, S. S. 1999. Strengthening governance of ocean fishery resources. Ecological Economics 31:275-286.
8. Hobday, A. J., A. Smith, H. Webb, R. Daley, S. Wayte, C. Bulman, J. Dowdney, A. Williams, M. Sporcic, J. Dambacher, M. Fuller, and T. Walker. 2007. Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing: methodology. Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Report R04/1072, Canberra. Available: www.afma.gov.au/environment/eco based/eras/docs/methodology.pdf. (June2011).
9. Jiao, Y., C. Hayes, and E. Cortes. 2009. Hierarchical Bayesian approach for population dynamics modeling of fish complexes without species-specific data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66:367-377.
10. Love, M. S., M. Yoklavich, and L. Thorsteinson. 2002. Rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. University of California Press, Berkeley.
11. MSA (Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conversation and Management Act). 2006. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006, U.S. Code, volume 16, sections 1801-1891d.
12. Murawski, S. A. 1991. Can we manage our multispecies fisheries? Fisheries 16(5):5-13.
13. Musick, J. A., G. Burgess, G. Cailliet, M. Camhi, and S. Fordham. 2000. Management of sharks and their relatives (Elasmobranchii). Fisheries 25(3):9-13.
14. O'Farrell, M. R., and L. W. Botsford. 2006. Estimating the status of nearshore rockfish (Sebastes spp.) populations with length frequency data. Ecological Applications 16:977-986.
15. Parker, S. J., S. A. Berkeley, J. T. Golden, D. R. Gunderson, J. Heifetz, M. A. Hixon, R. Larson, B. M. Leaman, M. S. Love, J. A. Musick, V.M. O'Connell, S. Ralston, H. J. Weeks, and M. M. Yoklavich. 2000. Management of pacific rockfish. Fisheries 23(3):22-25.
16. Patrick, W. S., P. Spencer, J. Link, J. Cope, J. Field, D. Kobayashi, P. Lawson, T. Gedamke, E. Cortes, O. Ormseth, K. Bigelow, and W. Overholtz. 2010. Using productivity and susceptibility indices to assess the vulnerability of United States fish stocks to overfishing. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 108:305-322.
17. Patrick, W. S., P. Spencer, O. Ormseth, J. Cope, J. Field, D. Kobayashi, T. Gedamke, E. Cortes, K. Bigelow, W. Overholtz, J. Link, and P. Lawson. 2009. Using productivity and susceptibility indices to determine the vulnerability of a stock: case studies from six U.S. fisheries. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-101.
18. Perry, R. I., C. J. Walters, and J. A. Boutillier. 1999. A framework for providing scientific advice for the management of new and developing invertebrate fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9:125-150.
19. Prager, M. H., and K. W. Shertzer. 2010. Deriving acceptable biological catch from the overfishing limit: implications for assessment models. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:289-294.
20. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: www.R-project.org. (September 2010).
21. Reuter, R. F., M. E. Conners, J. Dicosimo, S. Gaichas, O. Ormseth, and T. T. Tenbrink. 2010. Managing non-target, data-poor species using catch limits:lessons from the Alaskan groundfish fishery. Fisheries Management and Ecology 17:323-335.
22. Shertzer, K.W., M. H. Prager, and E. H. Williams. 2008.Aprobability-based approach to setting annual catch levels. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 106:225-232.
23. Shertzer, K. W., and E. H. Williams. 2008. Fish assemblages and indicator species: reef fishes off the southeastern United States. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 106:257-269.
24. Smith, A. D. M., K. J. Sainsbury, and R. A. Stevens. 1999. Implementing effective fisheries-management systems-management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56: 967.
25. USOFR (U.S. Office of the Federal Register). 2009. Magnuson-Stevens Act provisions; annual catch limits; national standard guidelines, Final Rule. Federal Register 74:11(16 January 2009):3178-3213.
26. USOFR (U.S. Office of the Federal Register). 2010. National standard 1-optimum yield. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 50, Part 600, Subpart D. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.