Efficacy of denture adhesives in maxillary dentures using gnathodynamometry: A comparative study

Odontology

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-161

  Polyzois, Gregory ^a   Lagouvardos, Panagiotis ^a   Frangou, Maria ^b   Stefaniotis, Theodoros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b Private Practice   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bite force; Denture adhesives; Gnathodynamometry

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; FITTYDENT; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SUPER COREGA; TOOTH CEMENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADHESIVES; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, UPPER; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE;

EID: 80052029690     PISSN: 16181247     EISSN: 16181255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-011-0003-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Shay K. The retention of complete dentures. In: Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE, editors. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1997. p. 400-11.
2. Grasso JE, Gay T, Rendell J, et al. Effect of denture adhesive on retention of the mandibular and maxillary dentures during function. J Clin Dent. 2000; 11: 98-103.
3. Hasegawa S, Sekita T, Hayakawa I. Effect of denture adhesive on stability of complete dentures and the masticatory function. J Med Dent Sci. 2003; 50: 239-47.
4. Gendreau L, Shanga G, Munoz C, et al. A study of denture adhesive in well-fitting dentures. J Dent Res. 2009; 88(Special Issue A): Abstract No. 422.
5. Chew CL. Retention of denture adhesives-an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 425-34.
6. Flǿystrand F, Koppang R, Williams VD, et al. A method for testing denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66: 501-4.
7. Koppang R, Berg E, Dahm S, et al. A method for testing denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 486-91.
8. Panagiotouni E, Pissiotis A, Kapari D, et al. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 578-85.
9. Zhao K, Cheng X-R, Chao Y-L, et al. Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 419-24.
10. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Hayakawa I. The evaluation of denture retention and ease of removal from oral mucosa on a new gel-type denture adhesive. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc. 2008; 52: 175-82.
11. Brawley RE, Sedwink HJ. Gnathodynamometer. Am J Orthodont. 1938; 24: 256-8.
12. Ortuǧ G. A new device for measuring mastication force (Gnathodynamometer). Ann Anat. 2002; 184: 393-6.
13. Rowlett AE. The gnathodynamometer and its use in dentistry. Proc R Soc Med. 1933; 26: 463-71.
14. Psillakis JJ, Wright RF, Grbic JT, et al. In practice evaluation of a denture adhesive using a gnathometer. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13: 244-50.
15. Tarbet WJ, Silverman G, Schmidt NF. Maximum incisal biting force in denture wearers as influenced by adequacy of denture-bearing tissues and the use of an adhesive. J Dent Res. 1981; 60: 115-9.
16. Kanapka JA. Bite force as a measure of denture adhesive efficacy. Comp Contin Edu Dent. 1984; 5(Suppl): 26-30.
17. Feller RP, Saunders MJ, Kohut BE. Effect of a new form of adhesive on retention and stability of complete maxillary dentures. Spec Care Dent. 1986; 6: 87-9.
18. Grasso JE, Rendell J, Gay T. Effect of denture adhesive on the retention and stability of maxillary dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72: 399-405.
19. Ghani F, Likeman PR, Picton DC. An investigation into the effect of denture fixatives in increasing incisal biting forces with maxillary complete dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 1995; 3: 193-7.
20. Fujimori T, Hirano S, Hayakawa I. Effects of a denture adhesive on masticatory functions for complete denture wearers-consideration for the condition of denture bearing tissues. J Med Dent Sci. 2002; 49: 151-6.
21. Baker RA, Farrell S, He T, et al. Clinical trial evaluating relative effectiveness of two commercial denture adhesives. J Dent Res. 2007; 86(Special Issue A): Abstract No. 2043.
22. Özcan M, Kulak Y, de Baat C, et al. The effect of a new denture adhesive on bite force until denture dislodgement. J Prosthodont. 2005; 14: 122-6.
23. de Baat C, van't Hof M, van Zeghbroeck, et al. An international multicenter study on the effectiveness of a denture adhesive in maxillary dentures using disposable gnathometers. Clin Oral Invest. 2007; 11: 237-43.
24. Pradies G, Sanz I, Evans O, et al. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22: 361-7.
25. Flǿystrand F, Kleven E, Øilo G. A novel miniature bite force recorder and its clinical application. Acta Odontol Scand. 1982; 40: 209-14.
26. Bakke M, Michler L, Han K, et al. Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. Scand J Dent Res. 1989; 97: 539-51.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-10.
28. Krouwer JS, Monti KL. A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1995; 33: 525-7.
29. Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Rehmann P. Changes in occlusal force at denture dislodgement after refabrication or optimization of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21: 305-6.
30. Tabe T, Hanaoka H, Yamamutchi K. The interrelation between biting force, activity of the masseter muscles. J Dent Res. 1974; 53: 1097.
31. Mackenna BR, Türker KS. Jaw separation and maximum incising force. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49: 726-30.
32. Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 223-32.