A choice experiment analysis for solid waste disposal option: A case study in Malaysia

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2993-3001

  Pek, Chuen Khee ^a   Jamal, Othman ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Solid waste disposal; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; RIVER POLLUTION; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER QUALITY;

CASE-STUDIES; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT; EXPERIMENT ANALYSIS; MALAYSIA; MUNICIPAL WASTE; PROTECTION MEASURES; SERVICE PROVIDER; SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

LAND USE;

RIVER WATER;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ESTIMATION METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND USE; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; POLLUTION CONTROL; RIVER WATER; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER QUALITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CROPLAND; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GOVERNMENT; LAND USE; MALAYSIA; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; RESIDENTIAL AREA; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; URBAN AREA; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 80052027376     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1994, 26:271-292.
2. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preferences approaches to measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80:64-75.
3. Blamey R., Gordon J., Chapman R. Choice modeling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2000, 43(3):337-357.
4. Blamey R.K., Bennett J.W., Louviere J.J., Morrison M.D., Rolfe J.C. The use of policy labels in environmental choice modeling studies. Ecological Economics 2000, 32:269-286.
5. Boxall P., Adamowicz W., Swait J., Williams M., Louviere J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:243-253.
6. Gerard K., Shanahan M., Louviere J. Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to inform health care decision-making: a pilot study of breast screening participation. Applied Economics 2003, 35:1073-1085.
7. Hanley N., Mourato S., Wright R.E. Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?. Journal of Economic Survey 2001, 15:435-462.
8. Hausman J., McFadden D. A specification test for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 1984, 52:1219-1240.
9. Hensher D.A., Johnson L.W. Applied Discrete Choice Modelling 1981, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Horne P., Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 207:189-199.
11. Huybers T. Domestic tourism destination choices - a choice modeling analysis. International Journal of Tourism Research 2003, 5:445-459.
12. Jamal O. Economic valuation of household preference for solid waste management in Malaysia: a choice modeling approach. International Journal of Management Studies 2006, 13(1):1-23.
13. Jamal O., Bennett J., Blamey R. Environmental values and resource management options: a choice modeling experience in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics 2004, 9:803-824.
14. Jusoh, J., 2002. Improving Municipal Solid Waste Landfills of Peninsular Malaysia: Organizational and Structural Adjustments. Doctoral dissertation, University of Winconsin-Madison. ProQuest Information and Learning Company, UMI #3072836.
15. Kathirvakle S., Muhd Noor M.Y., Kamaruzzaman S., Abdul Hamil S. Energy potential from municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Renewable Energy 2003, 29:559-567.
16. Kemperman A.D.A.M., Borgers A.W.J., Oppewal H., Timmermans H.J.P. Consumer choice of theme parks: a conjoint choice model of seasonality effects and variety seeking behavior. Leisure Sciences 2000, 22:1-18.
17. Louviere J.J. A conceptual and analytical framework for the analysis of spatial and travel choices. Economic Geography 1981, 57(4):304-315.
18. Morrison M.D., Bennett J.W., Blamey R.K. Valuing improved wetland quality using choice modeling. Water Resources Research 1999, 35:2805-2814.
19. Rolfe J., Windle J. Valuing the protection of aboriginal cultural heritage sites. The Economic Record 2003, 79(Special Issue):85-95.
20. Rolfe J., Bennett J., Louviere J. Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: testing for framing effects with choice modeling. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2002, 46:1-20.
21. Sakata Y. A choice experiment of the residential preference of waste management services - the example of Kagoshima city, Japan. Waste Management 2006, 27(5):639-644.
22. Sasao T. Analysis of the socioeconomic impact of landfill siting considering regional factor. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2004, 6:147-175.
23. Siderelis C., Brothers G., Rea P. A boating choice model for the valuation of lake access. Journal of Leisure Research 1995, 27(3):264-282.
24. Wang X.H., Bennett J., Xie C., Zhang Z.T., Liang D. Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the conversation of cropland to forest and grassland program: a choice modeling approach. Ecological Economic 2007, 63:114-125.
25. Yoo S.H., Kwak S.J., Lee J.S. Using a choice experiment to measure the environmental costs of air pollution impacts in Seoul. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 86(1):308-318.