Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: The AYA HOPE Study

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 305-314

  Harlan, Linda C ^a   Lynch, Charles F ^b   Keegan, Theresa H M ^c,d   Hamilton, Ann S ^e   Wu, Xiao Cheng ^f   Kato, Ikuko ^g   West, Michele M ^b   Cress, Rosemary D ^h,i   Schwartz, Stephen M ^j   Smith, Ashley W ^a   Deapen, Dennis ^e   Stringer, Sonja M ^k   Potosky, Arnold L ^l  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c CANCER PREVENTION INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^g WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^j USA   (United States)

^k Kelly Services   (United States)

^l GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Adolescent cancer; Consent forms; Medical records; Response rates; Survey; Young adult cancer

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER REGISTRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MORTALITY; NEOPLASM; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS; SURVIVOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEER PROGRAM; SURVIVORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052026839     PISSN: 19322259     EISSN: 19322267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-011-0173-y     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Heron MP. Deaths: Leading causes for 2004. National vital statistics reports: vol 56 no 5. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2007.
2. Bleyer A, Budd T, Montello M. Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the scope of the problem and criticality of clinical trials. Cancer. 2006; 107(7 Suppl): 1645-55.
3. Ferrari A, Montello M, Budd T, Bleyer A. The challenges of clinical trials for adolescent and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 50: 1101-04.
4. Loberiza FR, Cannon AJ, Weisenburger DD, Vose JM, Moehr MJ, Bast MA, et al. Survival disparities in patients with lymphoma according to place of residence and treatment provider: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5376-82.
5. Albritton K, Caligiuri M, Anderson B, Nichols C, Ulman D, Adams H, et al. Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Report of the Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. US DHHS, NIH, NCI, LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance, 108 pages [report on internet] available from: http://women. cancer. gov/library/AYAO_PRG_Report_2006_FINAL. pdf.
6. http://www.census. gov/main/www/cen2000.html.
7. Bellizzi KM, Miller MF, Arora NK, Rowland JH. Positive and negative life changes experienced by survivors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34: 188-99.
8. Richards J, Wiese C, Katon W, Rockhill C, McCarty C, Grossman D, et al. Surveying Adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization: mail and phone follow-up-What works at what cost? JABFM. 2010; 23: 534-41.
9. Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, Breslow NE, Donaldson SS, Green DM, et al. Study design and cohort characteristics of the childhood cancer survivor study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002; 38: 229-39.
10. Bleyer A, Budd T, Montello M. Older adolescents and young adults with cancer and clinical trials: Lack of participation and progress in North America. In: Bleyer A, Barr R, editors. Cancer in adolescent and young adults. Heidelburg: Springer Verlag; 2007. p. 71-81.
11. Stewart JH, Bertoni AG, Staten JL, Levine EA, Gross CP. Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 1818-9.
12. Beebe TJ, Rey E, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Talley NJ, et al. Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 50. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral. com/1471-2288/10/50.
13. Beebe TJ, Talley NJ, Camilleri M, Jankins SM, Anderson KJ, Locke GR. The HIPAA authorization form and effects on survey response rates, non-response bias, and data quality: a randomized community study. Med Care. 2007; 45: 959-65.
14. Nelson K, Elena Garcia R, Brown J, Mangione CM, Louis TA, Keller E, et al. Do patient consent procedures affect participation rates in health services research? Med Care. 2002; 40: 283-8.
15. Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. In Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center: Washington, DC; 2010.
16. Ziegenfuss JU, Beebe TJ, Rey E, Schleck C, Locke GR, Talley NJ. Internet option in a mail survey: more harm than Good? Epidemiology. 2010; 21: 585-86.
17. Brogger J, Nystad W, Cappelen I, Bakke P. No increase in response rates by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: A randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007; 9(5): e40. Available from: http://www. jmir. org/2007/e40/.