Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2191-2200

  Achtnicht, Martin ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; CO2 emissions; Energy saving; Mixed logit; Residential buildings; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; HEATING; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

GERMANY;

EID: 80052021904     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.026     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Achtnicht M. German car buyers' willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 09-058, Mannheim 2009.
2. Andersen S., Harrison G.W., Hole A.R., Rutström E.E. Non-linear mixed logit and the characterization of individual heterogeneity. Working Paper Series 6-2009 2009, CBS Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics, Frederiksberg.
3. Araña J.E., León C.J. Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: the role of emotions. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2316-2326.
4. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 1989, 99:116-131.
5. Banfi S., Farsi M., Filippini M., Jakob M. Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics 2008, 30:503-516.
6. Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Jenkins-Smith H.C., Silva C.L., Weimer D.L. Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47:331-363.
7. BMVBS (Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development) CO2 Gebäudereport 2007 2007, Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development, Berlin.
8. BMWi (Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology) Energiestatistiken - Entwicklung von Energiepreisen und Preisindizes 2010, Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, Berlin, URL:, (accessed on: 11 May 2010). http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Energie/energiestatistiken,did=180914.html.
9. Brouwer R., Brander L., Van Beukering P. "A convenient truth": air travel passengers' willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Climatic Change 2008, 90:299-313.
10. Brownstone D., Train K.E. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 1999, 89:109-129.
11. Brownstone D., Bunch D., Golob T., Ren W. Transactions choice model for forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Research in Transportation Economics 1996, 4:87-129.
12. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. How much is too much? An investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, context dependence and the choice of bid vectors in choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 40:165-176.
13. Daly, A., Hess, S., Train, K., 2011. Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. Transportation, forthcoming.
14. David P.A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 1985, 75(2):332-337.
15. EEWärmeG (Renewable Energies Heat Act) Gesetz zur Förderung Erneuerbarer Energien im Wärmebereich (Erneuerbare-Energien-Wärmegesetz - EEWärmeG). Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2008 Teil 1 Nr. 36 S. 1658, Bonn 2009.
16. Ek K., Söderholm P. The devil is in the details: household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1578-1587.
17. EnEV (Energy Savings Ordinance) Verordnung über energiesparenden Wärmeschutz und energiesparende Anlagentechnik bei Gebäuden (Energieeinsparverordnung - EnEV). Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2007 Teil 1 Nr. 34 S. 1519, Bonn 2007.
18. EnEV (Energy Savings Ordinance) Verordnung zur Anderung der Energieeinsparverordnung. Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2009 Teil 1 Nr. 23 S. 954, Bonn 2009.
19. EU (European Union) Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Official Journal of the European Communities L1/65 2002, Brussels.
20. EU (European Union) Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Official Journal of the European Union L153/13 2010, Strasbourg.
21. Goett D., Hudson K., Train K. Customer choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes. The Energy Journal 2000, 21(4):1-28.
22. Grösche P., Vance C. Willingness-to-pay for energy conservation and free-ridership on subsidization - evidence from Germany. The Energy Journal 2009, 30(2):135-154.
23. Hanley N., Adamowicz W., Wright R.E. Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test. Resource and Energy Economics 2005, 27:227-234.
24. Hensher D.A., Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30:133-176.
25. Hensher D.A., Stopher P.R., Louviere J.J. An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application. Journal of Air Transport Management 2001, 7(6):373-379.
26. Hersch J., Viscusi W.K. The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence. Climatic Change 2006, 77:121-136.
27. Hole A.R. Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. The Stata Journal 2007, 7:388-401.
28. Howarth R.B., Andersson B. Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energy Economics 1993, 15:262-272.
29. Hoyos D. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1595-1603.
30. IEA (International Energy Agency) World Energy Outlook 2009 2009, OECD/IEA, Paris.
31. IWU (Institut Wohnen und Umwelt) Basisdaten für Hochrechnungen mit der Deutschen Gebäudetypologie des IWU 2007, Darmstadt. URL:, (accessed on: 13 May 2010). http://www.iwu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dateien/energie/klima_altbauFlaechen_Gebaeudetypologie_07.pdf.
32. Jakob M. The drivers of and barriers to energy efficiency in renovation decisions of single-family home-owners. Working Paper Series 07-56 2007, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
33. Johnson E., Nemet G.F. Willingness to pay for climate policy: a review of estimates. La Follette School Working Paper No. 2010-011 2010, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
34. Kahneman D. A psychological perspective on economics. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 2003, 93(2):162-168.
35. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-292.
36. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5(1):193-206.
37. Kolstad C.D. Environmental Economics 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
38. Kwak S.-Y., Yoo S.-H., Kwak S.-J. Valuing energy-saving measures in residential buildings: a choice experiment study. Energy Policy 2010, 38:673-677.
39. Lindén A.-L., Carlsson-Kanyama A., Eriksson B. Efficient and inefficient aspects of residential energy behaviour: what are the policy instruments for change?. Energy Policy 2006, 34:1918-1927.
40. Long J.S., Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata 2006, Stata Press, College Station, Texas. 2nd edition.
41. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods - Analysis and Applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. MacKerron G.J., Egerton C., Gaskell C., Parpia A., Mourato S. Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1372-1381.
43. Munro A. Introduction to the special issue: things we do and don't understand about the household and the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 41:1-10.
44. Murphy J.J., Allen P.G., Stevens T.H., Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 30:313-325.
45. Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C., Wiersma G. Household preferences for energy-saving measures: a conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 2003, 24:49-64.
46. Revelt D., Train K.E. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80(4):647-657.
47. Revelt D., Train K.E. Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit. Working Paper 2000, University of California, Berkley.
48. Sadler M. Home energy preferences and policy: applying stated choice modeling to a hybrid energy economic model. Report to Natural Resources Canada 2003, Simon Fraser University.
49. Sardianou E. Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households. Energy Policy 2007, 35:3778-3791.
50. Simon H.A. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review 1959, 49(3):253-283.
51. Solomon B.D., Johnson N.H. Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2137-2144.
52. Sorrell S., Dimitropoulos J. The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:636-649.
53. Stieß I., van der Land V., Birzle-Harder B., Deffner J. Handlungsmotive, -hemnisse und Zielgruppen für eine energetische Gebäudesanierung. Project report, Commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research 2010, Frankfurt am Main. URL:, (accessed on: 6 May 2010). http://www.enef-haus.de/fileadmin/ENEFH/redaktion/PDF/Befragung_EnefHaus.pdf.
54. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
56. Venkatachalam L. Behavioral economics for environmental policy. Ecological Economics 2008, 67:640-645.
57. Viscusi W.K., Zeckhauser R.J. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: a rational and behavioral blend. Climatic Change 2006, 77:151-177.